Admissions Research

Plagiarism May Be Rife in Higher Ed Applications

Plagiarism appears to be endemic in applications, according to a recently published study by plagiarism prevention vendor iParadigms. The company examined 453,000 applications submitted to institutions of higher ed that were provided by an application service used by those colleges and universities. It found that 44 percent of the personal statements contained matching text and that 36 percent contained significant matching text, suggesting, according to iParadigms, plagiarism, collusion, or the use of recycled or purchased documents.

The company undertook the study in 2007, but only recently did it release the report, according to Jeff Lorton, product & business development manager and author of the report. Publication coincides with launch activities for Turnitin for Admissions, a new Web-based service introduced in December 2009 that enables admissions officers to detect plagiarism and assess the originality of student application materials to college and university programs.

"Significant amounts of matching text are problematic in documents that are short in length and normally do not contain references or share text with other documents," Lorton wrote in the report. "Personal statements attached to university applications should be the work of that applicant and help the university know more about the [prospective student]. It is safe to assume that more than 70,000 applicants that applied though this system did so with statements that may not have been their own work."

The report includes the top 100 Web sites that offer content most often duplicated in the applications that were analyzed. Nearly 38,000 matches derived from a single site.

Turnitin for Admissions is based on the same technology as Turnitin, the company's plagiarism product. The company said its newest service is useful for verifying admissions essays, personal statements, residency statements, answers to application questions, scholarship essays, reference letters, fellowship statements, and statements of purpose.

According to Lorton, the software doesn't simply match strings of words, which prevents misidentification of verbiage that would be similar across application text. "Our matching technology looks for patterns in the language," he said. "We would not match, 'I think I'm an ideal candidate for your college because,' unless the rest of the thought pattern was almost exactly the same beyond that string of words." The document analysis includes a comparison of the "fingerprint" of any submitted document against algorithms developed by the company, as well as a cross-reference against an iParadigms database containing thousands of papers and an Internet search for possible matches.

According to Lorton, "a soon to be published research study completed at an Ivy League university teaching hospital found that a substantial number of the residents plagiarized the personal statements included with their applications. This research will confirm that misconduct happens throughout the academic life of students (even after completing medical school)."

"Turnitin for Admissions was created by popular demand from our college and university customers," said Sally Elliott, chief operating officer at iParadigms. "For years, admissions deans have reported that they often receive identical personal statements from multiple applicants. Turnitin for Admissions will help them admit the best pool of candidates to their undergraduate and graduate programs."

Comments

Wed, Mar 3, 2010

I thought that the article and discussion of the software's application were interesting. I'm all for expecting originality from applicants, particularly when such criteria will improve the application process. That, I thought, should be a prime benefit from using the software, but not simply by having used it to detect misconduct.

Tue, Mar 2, 2010 Jeff Lorton Oakland California

Dian, I would like to set the record straight on the comments posted on your article. Dian did her due diligence on this article and asked many of the same questions asked by the readers through email and phone calls. Dian and 1105 Media are reporting facts based on data compiled using very sophisticated pattern-matching technology used by over 10,000 organizations from academic, corporate, government, legal, and the publishing industry. As Robert mentioned, we identify matching text that can only be confirmed as plagiarism by the admissions professional. We have included safeguards in this service to help eliminate self-plagiarism (matching to documents submitted to multiple programs buy the same applicant). Valid assumptions can be made when almost 500,000 matches include: 37,587 matches to www.personalstatement.info 15,170 matches to www.studential.com We do not think that it was a coincidence. The odds of writing the same words found on these websites are incredibly high. Personal statements do not usually contain quotes, and quotes to these websites are very unlikely. Admissions documents are part of the high stakes admissions process. Many consultants and web companies base their businesses on legitimate and questionable services to applicants. Many sell application documents for fees ranging $450-2,000 US. Application documents are read and evaluated by universities and considered important. The National Association of College Admissions Professionals found in their annual survey published in 2009 that: 56.6% of universities that select fewer than 50% of the applicants that applied report that the essay/writing sample is, “of considerable importance in the admissions decision.” In other words, selective programs use applicant created documents to help make admissions decisions and it s very important. I made a mistake when I used the word perspective instead of the correct word prospective. Thank you for catching my mistake. Jeff Lorton jlorton@turnitin.com 510-764-7650

Tue, Mar 2, 2010

An original composition does not necessarily mean a superior composition. I may reasonably expect duplication to fall around a center-point. I wonder if those lacking any duplication are off point or incomprehensible while those with 'excessive' duplication are plagiarized or were overly researched. The plagiarization should be substantially from a single source to distinguish it from content melded together from various sources.

Tue, Mar 2, 2010 Editor

Di, that wasn't your mistake. That's how the quote was released. I should have put [sic] in there. Instead, I've now changed it to "[prospective student]." An applicant is no longer a prospective applicant once he or she turns in an application! --David Nagel

Tue, Mar 2, 2010 Robert Creutz Oakland, CA

iParadigms products show extent of matching text (not necessarily evidence of misconduct). The *users* of our products interpret results of originality reporting. Regarding admissions representatives, using the new Tii for Admissions product could provide one additional criteria for distinguishing one student from the next. As an example, I may be reviewing two students with comparable credentials. The degree of originality in a personal statement could be interpreted as a stronger desire to become a member of a particular institution's student community. In this example, Tii is less a tool to smoke out misconduct, and more a tool to determine how vested a student is in gaining admission to your college or university.

Tue, Mar 2, 2010 Susan

Sounds like we should possibly consider returning to live 'comps' as a method of proving our capabilities.

Tue, Mar 2, 2010 Dian S Flackville, California

To the anonymous soul who caught my mistake with "perspective" vs. "prospective," thanks for pointing out my mistake. Always appreciate that *constructive* criticism. -- Di

Tue, Mar 2, 2010

. . . hmm. I don't think it is the university's problem but the applicant's. I am surprised by these comments. It is not the university that needs to provide 'creative' options it is the students. If I saw a personal statement that matched others I would think that applicant does not have what it takes. Geez, if they can't even write a paragraph on their own that is a red flag.

Tue, Mar 2, 2010

My son will receive his MA this year. He has applied to three universities for admission to a PhD program. His advisor told him, however, that he should have applied to 10 or 12 instead to stand a better chance of being accepted by at least one institution. He wrote a very nice statement of purpose for his applications. Each was tailored to the particular faculty strengths and specialties of the university to which he was applying, yet inevitably, there was substantial overlapping content among the three, which I would consider normal and expected. I worry, though, that Turnitin might flag his work as a false positive for suspected plagiarism on the specious grounds that there was, say, 75% overlap among the three applications submitted by the same candidate to multiple universities. I would like an assurance that Turnitin would not consider as suspected plagiarism multiple applications by a single prospective (NOT "perspective", as the media flacks promoting this simpleminded computer matching program wrote) student.

Tue, Mar 2, 2010

Good point, I too find the article and the study somewhat trite and silly. Honestly, how many different ways can a student communicate their life's ambition of studying at 'insert university' in a glorified cover letter. Perhaps universities fail to provide unique options for potential applicants to communicate and present themselves in creative ways. Also the psuedo-study was conducted by a plagiarism prevention vendor which I have huge problems with given the current climate of rampant collusion in the business environment.

Tue, Mar 2, 2010

iParadigm is the parent company of Turnitin. They've created a study that "confirms" the customer's supposed need for their product. Also, the biggest problem with their product is that if finds supposed matching text that has nothing to do with plagiarism, yet is labeled plagiarism. One last bit: The largest users of Turnitin by far are presently high schools. So -- why hasn't that slowed the (supposed) plagiarism in college applications? ... I think 1105 Communication really stumbled when it published this bit of public relations hoo-ha without further investigation. It damages the reputation of 1105 Communications --

Tue, Mar 2, 2010

That would be "nepotism"....

Tue, Mar 2, 2010

I find this article silly. Universities have expectations and a forumula that they expect. The personal statement is nothing more than a cover letter. A person using an online guide and recycling content is no worse than the politics of how some people also get into programs, i.e. networking, relations, nepitism...

Add your Comment

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above