Home > Special Series: Technology and the CEO >> Part 2: Expense or Investment

Features

Special Series: Technology and the CEO >> Part 2: Expense or Investment

5/31/2005

” Information technology is not simply a “thing” we purchase. Rather, it is a means to achieving strategic ends, and therefore deserves the president’s attention. In fact, Ward and Hawkins make the same point that I’m aiming at in this article: “Instead of thinking of information technology as a cost center,” they argue, “presidents would be well advised to focus the discussion on the extent to which the investment in technology furthers both sub-unit and institutional goals.” Why view information technology as an investment? Here are a few practical reasons:

First, today’s students expect to be able to use the latest (or nearly latest) computer-assisted, Internet-based systems to gain and exchange information and to handle the “business” of living. They are comfortable with the rapid changes in technology, and increasingly demand 24/7 services. They want to apply to your institution over the Internet, do their research and submit assignments electronically, register and pay their bills that way, and use the electronic superhighway for entertainment. While you may not think you’re losing students because your technology’s not up-to-date, you may not realize how many people never even apply if they discover you don’t have what they want.

Second, many faculty will have similar expectations—or in some cases, unrealistic expectations about what your institution should or should not be providing. Every campus has its technojet- setters and its Luddites among the faculty. Simply spending to satisfy the first group without a sound plan that takes into account the larger educational goals of an institution is sure to bring about a reaction from those who believe that any change from the chalkboard assisted lecture is a change for the worse. When you make it clear that you view investing in technology as a means to achieve educational goals, you can gain faculty buy-in by demonstrating that those whose teaching and research are aligned with the institution’s strategic objectives will be supported appropriately. Ask yourself: What educational goals do I want to achieve? Can those goals be achieved more efficiently and effectively if I enhance current operations through technological innovations?

While you may not think you’re losing students because your technology’s not up-to-date, you may not realize how many people never even apply if they discover you don’t have what they want.

Third—and this is a direct follow-on to my second reason—developing a plan for investing systematically in hardware, software, and personnel will help you ride out the natural ups and downs that will occur when “the next hot idea” sweeps across the educational landscape. Not everyone needs to be on the bleeding edge; developing long-term goals for your campus’s use of technology will allow you to say “no” to fads while having the resources available to say “yes” when you and your management team decide it’s time to upgrade, expand, or change systems. In recent years, there have been a number of tools developed to measure the effectiveness of technology: Dennis Jones’s Technology Costing Methodology (TCM), or Frank Jewett’s BRIDGE model, both described briefly in Sally Johnstone and Russell Poulin’s article on the cost of educational technology (“So, How Much Do Educational Technologies Really Cost?



Recommended Reading
  • California Community Colleges Partner with Waterfall Mobile on Statewide Emergency Notification Coverage

    The Foundation for California Community Colleges (FCCC) has awarded a statewide emergency alert notification contract to Waterfall Mobile. The contract establishes Waterfall's AlertU as an approved technology through the official non-profit foundation for the California Community College (CCC) system office. Through this partnership, individual colleges may directly implement emergency communication services, eliminating lengthy technology evaluation and RFP processes.

  • King's College and ASU Add e2Campus for Improved Emergency Notifications

    King's College and Arizona State University have switched to Omnilert's e2Campus for emergency notification. Omnilert also has introduced a new program called the ENS Conversion Service that allows schools to bulk upload data from their previous emergency notification system into e2Campus at no charge.

  • Saint Joseph Builds Out Wireless Network in Multi-year Upgrade

    Saint Joseph's University has begun deploying a Meru Networks wireless local area network across its Philadelphia campus as part of a multi-year effort to bring wireless coverage to every building on campus.

  • Vista Ramp Up Is Happening Now, Study Says

    Organizations may have been slow to adopt Microsoft Windows Vista, but expect that to change by late 2008 to 2009, according to a Forrester Research report by Benjamin Gray et al., published last week.

  • Talisma Launches New Version of CRM with Built-in Application Management

    Talisma Corp. announced version 8.0 of its constituent relationship management (CRM) application for higher education. The new release includes application management, a revamped user interface, two-way text messaging, personalized Web portals, and an ADA-compliant Web client, among other enhancements.

  • Bringing Composers into Classrooms Through Skype

    Two Pennsylvania teaching colleagues with an interest in music and technology are bringing remote experts into classrooms at almost no cost, using Skype's free videoconferencing technology.