Click here to receive your FREE subscription to Campus Technology
1/25/2006
"I know I put it somewhere. But it's been a while. Let's see, I used to have Compaq, Informix, Macromedia, Siebel Systems, PeopleSoft, Prometheus, and Sybase."
"Well, I found Sybase, honey, but I'm afraid we've misplaced your WebCT. And oh, I also found your SCT and Collegis, but they look a bit different. Oh hey, remember Digital?"
My friend Richard Katz sits where he has a good look at the corporate mergers and acquisitions that have alarmed many in higher education have taken place recently. He's reached a place that the rest of us might get to in a year or two. Enjoy his essay and, thanks Richard! - Terry Calhoun
By Guest Columnist Richard N. Katz
Vice President of EDUCAUSE and
Director of the EDUCAUSE Center
for Applied Research (ECAR).
Analysts for Thomson Financial estimated $75-80 billion of technology mergers in 2005, compared with $60 billion in 2004. Much of that activity revolves around software. Benjamin Pimentel, a writer for the San Francisco Chronicle, has noted that software firms are in the grip of "merger mania." ("Software Firms in the Grip of Merger Mania," San Francisco Chronicle, September 18, 2005). Though it is true that merger activity can promote standards and that the merging firms do find efficiencies of joint operation and economies of scale and scope, all these mergers still make me nervous. In fact, I am drinking even as I write this. And I am concerned that I will have to start buying my own T-shirts.
Harvard Business School Professor Michael Porter has described competitive strategy in terms of five basic forces: supplier power; buyer power; threat of a new entry to the market; threat of substitution (by customers); and the intensity (or lack thereof) of competitive rivalry. ("How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy," Harvard Business Review, vol. 57 (March/April 1979): 86-93). I think he has it about right. The current software merger frenzy comes after a time when much of higher education IT went "enterprise" and went commercial. Higher education learned that vanilla was a really good flavor. In the past decade, most institutions integrated robust environments composed of commercially vended databases, portals, and integrated ERP applications. These have generally been good for higher education and-when combined with networks, the Web, middleware, workflow, business intelligence, and other innovations-have ushered in an era of online self-service applications, reduced authorizations, shorter lines, better controls, and more satisfied students.
In light of these real benefits, should I be drinking this much? As a Libra, I have to conclude: "yes and no." Software industry consolidation is inevitable and inexorable. Shaking our fists at the sky will not reverse the trend. In the short run, newly consolidating firms will be too busy with their own problems of "accidental" architecture, expectant shareholders, nervous staff, executive beauty contests, and drinking customers to show off their expanding supplier power to full effect. In the long run, as John Meynard Keynes reminds us, "we are all dead."
:::::: NEWS
: Institute for Cyber Security at U Texas, San Antonio Opens Incubator:::::: CASE STUDY
:: DePaul Sets the Bar in Student Relationship Management
:::::: IT NEWS
:: Microsoft Unveils Exchange and SharePoint as Services:::::: SPOTLIGHT
: 6 Ways Not To Become Rote Using Instructional Technology:::::: NEWS and PRODUCT UPDATES
: CSU System Adopts Moodle LMS Services:::::: THE BUZZ
: Bringing Student Web "Stuff" to Campus Enterprise Systems:::::: WEIGHING IN
: Tipping Point for "Content"--Dynamic Interaction, Not Static Stuff:::::: PRODUCTS AND APPS
: Delta iTunes U Helps Meet Student Expectations for Web 2.0 Apps:::::: NEWS
: Carnegie Mellon Validates Production Xirrus 802.11n Network:::::: SECURITY SPOTLIGHT
: Smart Phone Security: New Challenges for Road Warriors:::::: CAMPUS SECURITY NEWS
: SMobile Releases Antivirus To Protect Google Android Phones