Home > Web 2.0 Entails 'Sleeping Giant' Security Risk

News

Web 2.0 Entails 'Sleeping Giant' Security Risk

10/30/2007

As increasing numbers of enterprises climb aboard the Web 2.0 bandwagon, it's more important than ever for software developers to keep security in mind during the development process. So says Danny Allan, director of security research at Watchfire, the Waltham, MA-based Web-app security company acquired by IBM in July. Allan was in Santa Clara, CA to speak at this year's AjaxWorld show, and he took a few minutes to talk with me before his presentation.

The two top vulnerabilities affecting Web 2.0 applications today, Allan said, are cross-site scripting (CSS) and cross-site request forgery (CSRF).

"CSS is nothing new," he said, "but the attack vectors and the way in which it is used in Web 2.0 applications is very different and much more dangerous. And CSRF is the sleeping giant. It hasn't been exploited much to date, but it's looming large on the horizon."

CSRF is a malicious Web site exploit in which an attacker fakes a request to a site. CSRF is similar to CSS, but where CSS requires crackers and malicious hackers to inject unauthorized code into a Web site, CSRF simply transmits unauthorized commands seemingly from a user the Web site trusts.

"In a cross-site attack, a malicious individual attacks a victim," Allan explains. "Say you're on your banking Web site, and I get control of your browser. I can essentially force you to log into your banking application and transfer funds to my account. Request forgery provides the site with a legitimate request; it exploits the way the Web works, which performs actions based on input from trusted and authenticated users without requiring the user to authorize a specific action. The challenge for organizations is, they don't know when the request is legitimate or it has been forced upon them."

Web 2.0 makes all of this a bit worse, Allan said, because every interaction isn't initiated by the user. The AJAX framework underneath makes many of these requests, so it becomes more and more difficult to tell whether the request came from the user.

The attacks are new, but the causes haven't changed.

"I think one of the problems is that we focus too much on the latest Web 2.0 attacks, and not on why that attack worked," Allan said. "The 'why' hasn't changed. If we build security into the software development lifecycle and consider things like input validation stringently and output encoding--all these things we've all been talking about for 15 years--we'll solve these problems."

One of the best things the industry has done to improve application security, Allan says, is implementing mature frameworks, like Java EE, .NET, and Struts. One of the challenges in the Web 2.0 world is that the frameworks for that environment have yet to achieve that same level of maturity.

Allan advises Web 2.0 developers to shift their approach to security essentially in the same way that many have shifted their approach in the overall development process: from a traditional waterfall approach to what amounts to an agile or lightweight approach. And his advice for app-dev managers who want to get their developers to be more security minded: Don't try to "boil the ocean" and test for everything. Pick the top couple of security risks--say, CSS and CSRF--and do an incremental rollout.

"You don't want to fire hose the developers with too many security tests," he said. "It becomes overwhelming and they end up not doing anything. If we do incremental and ongoing iterative testing, it's manageable."

Read More:


John K. Waters is a freelance journalist and author based in Palo Alto, CA.

Cite this Site

John K. Waters, "Web 2.0 Entails 'Sleeping Giant' Security Risk," Campus Technology, 10/30/2007, http://www.campustechnology.com/article.aspx?aid=52468

copy text (above) for proper citation



Recommended Reading
  • Gates Highlights R&D at CES08, Unveils Microsoft Touch Wall

    Microsoft's Chairman Bill Gates spent a lot of time Wednesday talking about "empowering the workers" at the Microsoft's 12th annual CEO Summit 2008 in Redmond, WA, where he gave a keynote speech. However, Gates wasn't talking about political revolutions or even pay raises for office workers before the CEO crowd. Instead, he was referring to new software technologies that can better enable collaboration, social networking and decision-making on the job.

  • Vista Vulnerability Study Puts Microsoft on Defensive

    Microsoft and some independent security researchers had the blogosphere buzzing Wednesday over a series of denunciations after one company claimed that the Vista operating system was more vulnerable to malware and other exploits than previous operating systems.

  • New Blackboard Sync Application Leverages Facebook

    Blackboard Inc. today announced Blackboard Sync, an application that allows students to receive course updates and communicate with classmates while logged on to Facebook.

  • Standards: The Sooner the Better

    Technology solutions work best when they well together. That is why the nonprofit group IMS Global Learning Consortium is developing learning tools interoperability standards for the education technology community...

  • U.K. Education Group Escalates Microsoft Complaints

    A consultancy to the U.K. government has forwarded complaints about Microsoft's licensing and interoperability practices to the European Commission (EC), according to an announcement issued by the Becta consulting group Monday.

  • University Students and Researchers Enjoy JavaOne

    The JavaOne conference, held May 6-9 in San Francisco, brought together developers from industry, education, and other markets, filling the Moscone Convention Center with a wide array of sessions and exhibits for the open source Java developer community.