Click here to receive your FREE subscription to Campus Technology
1/9/2008
My campus is in the latter stages of switching to a new Learning Management System (LMS) after 6+ years on a "first generation" platform. Over the course of these years, our use of web-based learning has gone from essentially zero to thousands of courses and hundreds of faculty participants. Using the built-in content management tools of our first-generation system, these faculty members have developed a rich set of digital content for themselves and their students. After we got past the faculty chorus of "Why are you doing this to me?" and "I'm just now learning the old system and you're making me learn a new one!" we moved on to the task of bringing the hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of pieces of learning content into thousands of course development areas on the new system (which also has its own built-in content management tools.)In addition to forcing the faculty to relearn the basics of 'teaching' within the new system (e-mail, discussions, etc.), we had to also show them how to become content managers, using an entirely new set of tools and techniques. For months leading up to the cutover to the new system, our faculty had to learn how to navigate the new system's content management structure and presentation mechanisms. (Needless to say, during the RFP process, all of this seemed smaller in scope and more straightforward.) We have now come to realize that, while IMS packaging or built-in migration tools sounds great on the surface, they fall well short of perfection in the cold reality of thousands of courses packed with individual pieces of learning content.
We are now wrestling with the question of what we will do in another 5-8 years when it is time to switch again. Will we dump the faculty on the street again with their material? Will our current vendor create a smooth path for eventually leaving them? Will the faculty applaud our selection of a new system for them to teach with? The likely answer to all of these questions is a resounding "No!"
The central issue is that generally, when we buy an LMS, we are also buying a content management system.
Yuba Community College District (YCCD) has contracted with AT&T to provide wireless Internet access to the 11,000 students attending the district's two Northern California colleges, Yuba College in Marysville and Woodland Community College.
Migration to virtualization won't be the quick transition that some technology evangelists have predicted, according to recent surveys by two IT security companies. Nor is virtualization as secure as many might want it to be.
The intrusion last month into Vice Presidential candidate Sarah Palin's e-mail highlighted the frailty of some types of data security measures. What are the lessons for the rest of us?
A new report from the National Academy of Sciences, part of which was co-authored by an Indiana University School of Law-Bloomington professor, casts doubt on the effectiveness, lawfulness, and appropriateness of using data-based tools such as data-mining and biometrics to fight terrorism.
Physicists at South Africa's University of KwaZulu-Natal are set to install a quantum communication security solution over the eThekwini Municipality fibre-optic network infrastructure in Durban.
Cedarville University in southwestern Ohio has implemented SonicWALL firewalls to provide high-speed gateway firewall protection for its 3,000 students.