Click here to receive your FREE subscription to Campus Technology
Exclusive Interview
Desire2Learn CEO Makes Case Against Blackboard Patent, Court Ruling
A conversation with Desire2Learn's John Baker and Diane Lank
3/17/2008
It was an amazing strategy where they engaged PR firms and others to come up with strategies around containing and controlling us and prevent us from, in their words, competing against them for clients and for potential clients.
Nagel: All right. Right now you guys are working with Blackboard to resolve some of the issues in the case. What are you doing right now with them?
Baker: Right now we've been asked by the court to have a meet-and-confer with our counsel to come up with a potential "reasonable royalty" to allow existing and new clients to license Blackboard technology.
Nagel: This is an open-ended question. Answer it any way you want. What happened in Texas?
Baker: I personally think I learned a tremendous amount. I was actually trying to use our new ePortfolio product while I as down there, but our lawyers told me that would be discoverable, so I had to stop. But I wanted to share what I was learning. It was an incredible experience. I learned so much about the court system in the U.S.
I found it troubling to understand how a jury could be asked to understand ... all the elements of the law that goes around patents, as well as understanding the technology in question. It was pretty hard for me to sit through some of the testimony. I can only imagine what jury members would have been thinking.
For me it was fairly frustrating because we tending to be focusing on the words that were within the patent. So we tried to talk about prior art that met the definition, the claim construction the court uses to define [elements of] the patent. And Blackboard fought against us by using words that weren't in the patent and weren't in the claim construction. They were almost creating smoke and mirrors around the actual, real heart of the matter. We were trying to define what's in the patent; they were trying to do everything they could to avoid using the words that were in the patent to make it abundantly difficult for a jury to, in my opinion, make the right decision.
Nagel: Ultimately was the validity of the patent ever in question in the trial itself?
Baker: Absolutely. We put up prior art that should have invalidated that patent.
Nagel: I don't mean what you presented; I mean what the jury was asked to consider.
Baker: Oh yes. The jury was certainly asked to consider the validity of the patent.
Diane Lank: Now, remember with that, Dave, that the standard of proof there was "clear and convincing." It's not what they call "mere preponderance of the evidence." To invalidate a patent in court, the party challenging the patent has to prove by clear and convincing evidence that the patent should be invalidated.
One of the things--and I think this goes to what John said--is we tried to focus on the patent. And I think it's fair to say Blackboard tried to focus on anything but the patent. And one of the things that we heard several times in the trial from Blackboard was that the clear and convincing evidence standard is the same standard that they use in Texas to take a child away from its parents. And that's the kind of thing that, I'm not sure, that that kind of language advances the ball in terms of helping the jury.
Recommended Reading
- IBM Unveils New Software Designed To Streamline eDiscovery
IBM has announced the release of new Enterprise Content Management (ECM) software specifically designed to meet the needs of clients dealing with complex legal discovery requirements. The eDiscovery solutions expand on IBM's ECM platform and are intended to give organizations greater control of digitally stored documents in an effort to reduce costs and streamline the discovery process involved in litigation.
- Microsoft Releases SQL Server 2008 to Manufacturing
Microsoft has released SQL Server 2008 to manufacturing (RTM) and, as an evaluation edition, to subscribers of its Microsoft Development Network and TechNet services, the company announced Wednesday.
- Security Woes Up, as PHP and OSS Make the List
Software vulnerabilities are up this year, especially Web browser-based ones, according to a new report from IBM Internet Security Systems. The X-Force 2008 Mid-Year Trend Statistics Report, released in late July, defined the problem broadly. A vulnerability is anything that results "in a weakening or breakdown of the confidentiality, integrity, or accessibility of the computing system."
- Textbook Publishing in a Flat World
According to the National Association of College Stores in a 2007 survey, the average cost of a new college textbook was $53. The founders of Flat World Knowledge, which launches with its first run of college textbooks this fall, consider that too high--so high, in fact, that they'll be offering textbooks for free, at least in versions that can be read online.
- CourseCast 2.0 Adds Podcasting, Streaming Media Features to Free Lecture Capture System
Panopto has released CourseCast 2.0, an update to the company's classroom capture system that's available free to academic users. CourseCast 2.0 had previously been available as part of Panopto's beta program for educators since June.
- It IS about Technology: Integrating Higher Ed into Knowledge Culture
For more than twenty years, we educational technologists have talked about "integrating information technology into higher education." The implication was that education would stay the same and information technology would benignly slip in and cause no ruckus at all. This rhetoric no longer applies, if it ever did, and does a disservice to us as we work through the intricacies of this age.
