Home > Company Ordered To Stop 'Misleading' Students on College Admission Sites

News

Company Ordered To Stop 'Misleading' Students on College Admission Sites

4/25/2008

A federal judge is ordering a "clean-up" of language presented on a company's Web sites that help students apply to colleges after a competitor filed suit charging that the Web sites deceived users. CollegeNET filed the suit against XAP, citing patent infringement and unfair competition. Both companies offer Web sites through which students can apply to multiple colleges and universities for admission and financial aid.

According to the lawsuit, XAP provided the service free to participating schools and resold the data it collected from applicants. When students checked a "yes" option on XAP-run websites, the suit said, they may have believed they were applying directly to specific schools, whereas they were actually consenting to the sale of their personal information to third parties. CollegeNET believed it was unable to compete with those sites because it had to charge participating schools for online college application services.

The lawsuit is chapter two in a continuing legal battle between the two firms. A previous lawsuit ended in a $4.5 million damage judgment for CollegeNET, an award the company said it believes it may not be able to collect. This latest legal battle addressed two affiliations XAP maintains with public agencies, one with the Kentucky Higher Education Assistance Authority and the other with the Georgia Student Finance Commission.

For its part, XAP contended that it has made the language surrounding the opt-in questions clearer and that it no longer sells student information. CollegeNET pointed out that XAP collects revenue in the hundreds of thousands of dollars a year from the Kentucky and George agencies. It is the schools under those two entities that can use XAP's online application process free of charge, whereas they'd have to pay CollegeNET for the same service.


Dian Schaffhauser is a writer who covers technology and business. Send your higher education technology news to her at dian@dischaffhauser.com.

Cite this Site

Dian Schaffhauser, "Company Ordered To Stop 'Misleading' Students on College Admission Sites," Campus Technology, 4/25/2008, http://www.campustechnology.com/article.aspx?aid=61278

copy text (above) for proper citation



Recommended Reading
  • RIAA Outsources Fingering of Students Who Share Music Illegally

    The RIAA is outsourcing the hunt for music thieves. Its largest target currently is those who operate from within colleges and universities, a move that has piqued the attention of Educause.

  • Microsoft Expands Education Footprint in Asia Pacific Region

    Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates announced new partnerships to extend accessibility and computer literacy in the Asia Pacific region during a speech in Jakarta at a government leader gathering earlier this week.

  • IT Struggling Over Security, Compliance

    IT pros are having a hard time balancing security, software patch management and IT auditing with a host of other duties, according to a survey released Monday by Shavlik Technologies.

  • Toronto College Upgrades Network with Gigabit Ethernet Wireless Links

    Toronto-based George Brown College has gone public about its deployment of six BridgeWave GE60 wireless links to upgrade its campus-wide network.

  • Gates Highlights R&D at CES08, Unveils Microsoft Touch Wall

    Microsoft's Chairman Bill Gates spent a lot of time Wednesday talking about "empowering the workers" at the Microsoft's 12th annual CEO Summit 2008 in Redmond, WA, where he gave a keynote speech. However, Gates wasn't talking about political revolutions or even pay raises for office workers before the CEO crowd. Instead, he was referring to new software technologies that can better enable collaboration, social networking and decision-making on the job.

  • Vista Vulnerability Study Puts Microsoft on Defensive

    Microsoft and some independent security researchers had the blogosphere buzzing Wednesday over a series of denunciations after one company claimed that the Vista operating system was more vulnerable to malware and other exploits than previous operating systems.