Google Ghosts of Christmas Past: When Old News Reappears As New News
        
        
        
        By Bob Roseth,
 
University of Washington

One of my favorite Web sites is Google News (www.news.google.com). 
  Google provides a rich site for breaking news and allows me to customize e-mail 
  alerts that are sent to me when keywords that I have selected appear in a major 
  news story. But you can imagine my surprise when the first item in my recent 
  Google News alert was from a release my office had issued back in 1999. A long 
  list of other "news" items followed, from those golden days of yesteryear, 
  1997 through 2003. 
I went to talk with our Web programmer, who is responsible for the design of 
  our Web site (www.uwnews.org) 
  and the creation of our content management system. "So why would Google 
  News be running our old news releases?" I asked. 
He scratched his head and grinned. "I have no idea. If you find out, please 
  let me know." 
The next day, I discovered that lots of people read Google News. Even more 
  important, a lot of people have their own alerts, and they use the information 
  from those alerts to spread news to their colleagues across the country and 
  around the world. The calls and e-mails started coming to our office in a steady 
  stream. "How come no one invited us to the conference that you're having?" 
  (The conference was held in 2002.) "We'd like to reprint your news release 
  on adoptive families." (Well, OK, but the release is from 1997 and both 
  the source and the person who wrote the release are no longer here.) "That 
  information you released about killer whales is out of date and very damaging 
  to our whale-watching business. Don't you know that since you wrote that release 
  the whale population has rebounded?" (We do know, but we didn't actually 
  reissue the five-year-old release.) "Don't you think it's in poor taste 
  to issue a news release about a researcher who has been dead for five years?" 
  (As a matter of fact, we do.) It was going to be a long day. 
With the help of our Web department, we were able to put a disclaimer at the 
  top of all releases on our site, urging people to look at the date of the release 
  and alluding to the Google News problem. But I knew we had to get to the root 
  of the problem and see if Google could halt the proliferation of old news. I 
  asked our Web guy if he knew how to get a real, live Google person on the phone. 
  He laughed. "I'll buy you lunch if you get to talk to a real Google person." 
Based on my previous experience trying to get technical support, I figured 
  he'd leave work that day with the lunch money still in his pocket. I called 
  a few numbers from the Google site and in each case was sent into voice mail. 
  Finally, I left the message that, if we didn't hear back soon, we would be obligated 
  to issue a news release outlining Google's gaffe. Sonja from the Google PR staff 
  called back within about 10 minutes, and by the end of the day I received an 
  e-mail from an engineer, identifying precisely what they think had gone wrong: 
People searching our news site can look for all news chronologically, or they 
  can look for a subset of the news by topic, also stored chronologically. The 
  Google "spider" crawled not just our main news page but also some 
  of the subsidiary news pages, apparently without sensing the correct creation 
  date of each news release. 
Mark Twain said, "A lie can go halfway around the world while the truth 
  is still putting its boots on." Similarly, in this age of instant communication, 
  our old news had gone around the world several times before we realized what 
  was up. But things had finally returned to status quo ante. 
What did I learn from this? 
First, take any reference about your institution that appears on the Internet 
  very seriously. A small blaze can quickly become a conflagration. 
Second, be persistent in trying to get misinformation corrected. You may have 
  to break through bureaucracy and even make mild threats, just to get the appropriate 
  people to respond. 
Third, move quickly with your own tools to squelch rumors and correct misstatements. 
  And finally, recognize that some aggregators are probably going to get it wrong 
  at some point. Your job is to be vigilant, identify the problems quickly, and 
  move swiftly to minimize them. 
Oddly, a handful of folks benefited from the anomaly. Some news is never old. 
  We had several calls from people responding to one of the news releases from 
  1998, saying that they were interested in participating in a research project 
  described in the release. We checked with the faculty member in charge of the 
  research: She was still recruiting participants! A colleague of mine summed 
  it up aptly, "There¹s no news like old news!"
 Bob Roseth is director of News and Information at the University of Washington. 
  His office Web site, www.uwnews.org 
  , is a participant in Google News.
[Editor¹s end note: We at CT also got caught up in the problem of the 
  outdated releases found via Google News, and errantly ran one of the items in 
  the December 8, 2005 IT Trends e-newsletter, announcing that the University 
  of Washington had received a new Educause award. Way out here in California, 
  we could hear all the head-scratching coming from Boulder, Colorado. It wasn¹t 
  long before Educause staff e-mailed and very gently asked why we were running 
  the five-year-old story. UW¹s Bob Roseth followed up to shed light on the 
  situation and helped us correct our error.]