Viewpoint

ePortfolio: There's No 'There' There

Many educators and administrators have caught the ePortfolio bug. But where does this bug lead them? It leads, seemingly, in many different directions. And here's why: ePortfolios mean differing things to different people.

For some, an ePortfolio is an open education approach to learning. For others, it's the technologies that support open education. For others, it's the learning artifacts students create and structure. For still others, it's a way to assess student progress toward learning goals. And, finally, for others, ePortfolios are a way to record a person's professional achievements over time.

Monday morning, 4 am, shoveling a foot of snow out of the driveway so I can catch the Acela to Manhattan to meet an administrator from Curtin University in Perth, Australia. Over lunch, we talk about plans for Curtin to undertake an ePortfolio initiative. During the past decade, I've had many such conversations with educators and administrators over how to "do" ePortfolios. The conversations involve a lot of questions on my part. I need to find out which "face" of ePortfolio I'm seeing before I can offer any comments.

There was a series of commercials on television a few years ago that made the claim, "We don't make many of the things you use, but we make them better."  This is true of the ePortfolio idea as well.

Innovations in learning over the past few decades have sought to increase student engagement based on observations that engagement seems to correlate with learning. So, academic institutions have tried to become more "student centered." They have devised ways for learning to be active or problem-based or experiential. Educators want students to take responsibility for their own learning, and these alternate ways of learning are designed to invite a sense of ownership.

Other examples of active, student-centered learning are service learning, internships, field experience, even a semester abroad. But, what general umbrella term describes this general thrust to hand the baton to learners? Recently, a book from MIT Press called Opening Up Education, (Kumar and Iiyoshi, eds.), used the term "open education" to describe the various instantiations of the impulse toward student engagement. Open education can mean being open to whatever approaches it takes to facilitate learning.

This book, which has gained quite a bit of attention in the past few months, looks at how technologies are "making better" various open education practices. ePortfolio technology is one of those. (Note: A technology doesn't have to be called an ePortfolio for it to be used as an ePortfolio.)

Why are ePortfolios making open education initiatives better? If we are indeed moving toward using more open education approaches, then students are learning outside the (traditional) box. Once you move from lockstep learning and introduce variations in how learning goals are met, then you need some mechanisms to help track and process the variations. Perhaps teachers judge the comments that students make about their learning, with evidence to back those comments or illustrate those comments. Students can follow various paths to learn what you want them to learn, but they must in the end show that they can talk about that learning in ways that others can understand.

Without some way for students to manage their learning evidence and tie their comments to that evidence, the variations would overwhelm the teacher. But, with digital evidence and some aggregating tools, the variations can indeed be handled.

In other words, let students follow the paths that are most comfortable and productive for them, be it artistic or text-based, research, synthesizing, oral argument, video production, coordinating a team, etc. But ask them to keep evidence of their work along the way. And ask them to explain what they learned.

ePortfolio, then, is about open education but, as a technology, supports open education. It is about students owning their own work and about connecting that work to the curriculum. It is also about longitudinal learning. It is many things, but in fact is perhaps primarily the core cluster of capabilities and attributes that enables education to flower in this century.


Comments

Wed, Mar 25, 2009 Ray Tolley UK

Trent, right as you are about identifying the issues and various solutions, I feel that there is one obvious statement that has not been made and should be made. The e-Portfolio is not an 'either..., or..., or.... or...' it is 'ALL'. But even clearer in my mind is the concept of 'many to many to many'. In other words, I have many different 'faces' for many different audiences and for many different purposes. For far too long we have had entrenched opinions as to the only right purpose for an e-Portfolio. It is time to accept that the e-Portfolio is 'all things to all men'. No excuses, just get on and do it. The eFolio solution does just that, some content might be used in several different places but only uploaded once. Different views as accessed via different permissions make the content and 'self representation' quite different according to these differing audiences - and all at the same time. - It can be done and one doesn't need to be a PhD student either. - Ray T

Thu, Mar 5, 2009 Michael E. Russell San Diego, CA

This concept is part of the transition to a new paradigm of learning, the old idea that the "Teacher" has expert knowledge and lectures, with one way communication, to the student is over. People have to be responsible for thir own education, teachers will be guides, learning with their students, and providing warnings of pitfalls and helping the learner maximize their potential and productivity. Professors will still be experts, to whom you look to answer the questions about how to proceed to the next level, but their value will be as masters of specialized arts and science, not as educators. Instructors will be the standard form of educator, they teach us the "HOW" of various technology, but not the "WHY". Real teaching comes from a passion to learn and communicate with individuals, not as an authority, but as a mentor. Without the ability to evaluate students directly, E-portfolios will give prospective employers the ability to judge the potential of employees and see sample proof of their abilities.

Wed, Mar 4, 2009 TomCarroway Rochester, NY

I think the ePortfolio vehicle and tool perspective is a useful one for managing results, organizing content, and providing a platform to represent and display results. However, it's the narrative that should accompany this ePortfolio that is most crucial - as I believe the ultimate goal of an ePortfolio is to A. provide entree into the world of professional / for-pay application of one's knowledge, skills/abilities & experience - as well as B. to structure the educational experience (dare I say "scaffold"?) if the ePortfolio is used as a planned strategic and tactical compilation of plans, results, analysis, learning, etc. - a representation of a person's personal and professional growth in a field, and perhaps, if maintained, a professional calling card and record of a lifetime's work. This idea - that ePortfolio is not just summative, but formative and metacognitive and something that can structure a meaningful organization of "stuff" (as well as be flexible enough to provide a tool to craft or customize your "story") from the entree of an educational journey through the application of continous learning - and even more powerfully, as a tool to share in a community of peers and professionals, now that's an idea I can advocate. There are direct and meaningful relationships to be drawn from ePortfolios as a "solution", to the problems of semantics, Web 2.0, personal literacy, professional literacy, competency, and even innovation - but an ePortfolio should first be understood as just a solution, that has potential value only if situated or related with a true problem or goal...

Wed, Mar 4, 2009 Trent Batson

I agree with Brian and Bob that the technology capabilities we have now are far from perfect. One problem is that we are designing one tool to serve ALL purposes for ePortfolios. Confounding that problem is that we seem to think all transactions must be automated. A Web 2.0 model for ePortfolio tools, where different apps support different kinds of ePortfolio functions, and where the work can be referred to or imported, is a better model -- a federated ePortfolio. We need a suite of ePortfolio apps from authoring to aggregating to managing to presenting and finally to feeding the institution's assessment management system. --trent

Wed, Mar 4, 2009 Bob Duniway Seattle University

I think Brian's comment is right on the money. What is often glossed over in the desire to move to student centered learning is that the faculty still have a responsibility to communicate expectations and evaluate student performance against standards of excellence. A place to put your stuff may be useful, but to turn ePortfolio into an effective educational platform you need to design standards for evaluating the students' work and communicating back to them where they are doing well and where they still need further development. That takes us back to grades and rubrics, and an ePortfolio system that doesn't support managing the recording of evaluations by faculty of student work (both comments and some type of scoring) is missing an important tool in the teaching and learning toolkit.

Wed, Mar 4, 2009 Brian Donohue-Lynch Quinebaug Valley Community College

ePortfolios can be a step in the right direction of gathering and managing the evidence of student learning. They can be a valuable tool both for students themselves and for institutions. But in themselves they are more like what George Carlin use to say about our houses: they are a place to put our stuff. And this is not the full potential we should be looking for in terms of 21st century tools with which to gather, manage, and use the 'evidence of student learning' for the improvement of learning. Glorified electronic file drawers don't take us fully in the direction we need (or can) go. The author slightly touches on this in his reference to the use of "digital evidence and some aggregating tool," but it is the *right* aggregating tool (and/or processes) that we need. With the right evidence gathering processes facilitated by the right 'aggregating tool(s)' the artifacts within an eportfolio will speak volumes not only to the student, but to their institution, their employer, their transfer institutions, and more. ePortfolios have not yet been developed to this level of maturity. And there is a danger that in our enthrallment with their ability to give us a place to put our stuff, we will be happy to use them for this purpose (students' self-generated comments and all) while failing to notice what they still seriously lack.

Add your Comment

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above