Survey

8 in 10 Students Turn to Wikipedia for Research

Eighty-two percent of students in higher education turn to Wikipedia for their course-related research. But, according to a new report out of the University of Washington, most are doing it just to give their research a jump start.

The report, "How Today's College Students Use Wikipedia for Course-Related Research," is part of an ongoing research effort through the University of Washington Information School (iSchool) called Project Information Literacy (PIL).

For the report, researchers Michael Eisenberg, iSchool dean emeritus and professor, and Alison Head, iSchool research scientist, surveyed more than 2,300 students across six college and university campuses in spring 2009 on their use of the online collaborative information resource. They found that the vast majority of students across disciplines, more than eight in 10, used Wikipedia in some fashion to "obtain background information or a summary about a topic." And 52 percent of them said they used it frequently even when their instructors advise them against it.

Why do they do it?

Most cited a variety of reasons: 76 percent said it helped give them a head start, and 67 percent said it helped them with "terms and use of language used about certain topics," according to the report. Other reasons included ease of use (69 percent), comprehensibility (64 percent), and hyperlinked citations (54 percent), among several others.

The researchers said the students reported using Wikipedia primarily in the early stages of coursework, with 40 percent using it at the "very beginning" of a project and 30 percent "near the beginning." Only 2 percent reported using it toward the end of a project.

So what about concerns of some faculty members who seem at times consumed with Wikipedia's lack of rigor or credibility? Most students reported that they do not inform their professors that they use Wikipedia and do not cite it as a source in their work.

"Wikipedia helps many college students because it offers coverage, currency, convenience and comprehensibility in a world where students don't always expect credibility," Head wrote in a statement released to coincide with the report. "We found that while college students use Wikipedia, they do so knowing its limitations--it has some credibility but not deep. Our findings also lead us to believe that support and solutions from multiple outlets, not just one tool, service or individual, may work the best."

Respondents comprised sophomores, juniors, and seniors attending Harvard University, Illinois State University, the University of Washington, Chaffey College in California, Shoreline Community College in Washington, and Volunteer State Community College in Tennessee.

A complete copy of the University of Washington report can be accessed freely here.

Comments

Mon, Mar 29, 2010 William Badke Langley, BC

As an instructor in informational research methods, I encourage my students to remain aware of Wikipedia's limitations but to use it judiciously for foundational information and for discovering additional bibliography. The vast majority of academic librarians use Wikipedia extensively for quick factual information. While it must always be used with caution, it is not nearly as unreliable as most naysayers believe. When the majority of our students are using this source, simply telling them not to is not a reasonable option. Instead, help students to understand the nature and limitations, then let them use it judiciously. Wikipedia might not appear in bibliographies, but it is still the most widely used encyclopedia available today.

Wed, Mar 24, 2010

I feel that anyone who uses Wikipedia as a source is allowing themselves to be misled! As anyone is able to login to Wikipedia and change anything within whatever page you are on. Yes there are a few that are locked due to controversy. However, how can anyone who is doing true research why would you use something that is able to be changed.

Wed, Mar 24, 2010 Keith B. Austin, TX

Prof. Hill, As a university student I feel that Wikipedia creates a great springboard for research. Often times the information is cited, and points to a legitimate website. I will use that link to get to a more reliable site. Then the respected industry site may even cite more resources (journals, etc.). Very rarely will I take information directly from Wikipedia and use it in a paper. It's used more as a card catalog, of sorts.

Wed, Mar 24, 2010 Nathan Rinne Minnesota

I think the students are on to something, and the teachers would do well to think critically about this. I have done some work on this, if anyone is interested: Paper: http://eprints.rclis.org/17452/

Webinar based on paper: http://www.minitex.umn.edu/events/training/archived.asp#274

Download ppt slides: http://www.slideshare.net/rinnen/wikipedia-the-educators-friend

Wed, Mar 24, 2010 Prof. Larry Hill Rochester Institute of Technology

I wholeheartedly agree with Rosemarie's comments. In my courses, at the BS level, I strongly discourage the use of non-peer reviewed sources (albeit Wikipedia being a loose example of the open-source paradigm)and at the MS level forbid its usage as a source. In all my paper assignments, where my students must fully cite (APA) their sources, I expect a minimum of 50-75% of references come from "real" texts (hard-copy and/or electronic versions) and the remainder from reliable web sources. Reliable is defined as peer-reviewed journals, resepected industry site and the like. What I consistently hear from my students is the they use Wikipedia (among other similar sites) because it's fast, and "that's how we did it in high school." SOmetimes it feels like I'm asking them to surrender their cellphone when I refuse tto allow the use of non-peer reviewed sources!

Wed, Mar 24, 2010 Rosemarie Menager

Wikipedia does function like the online encyclopedia and it is a convenient place to start for students to get general knowledge. I think it's important for professors to explain quality of sources and the differences between material that has been peer reviewed or is primary source. I assign work that requires use of primary sources and try to give students an idea of how knowledge is constructed so they have a better idea of opinion versus documented and supported information. In this era where we have seemingly credible sources printing info about WMD's and later retracting that info, it's ever more important to make students understand the need for critical assessment of information and sources.

Add your Comment

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above