Mobile Computing | News

Monterey College of Law Pilots iPad Programs for Students and Faculty

As the centerpiece of a new mobile computing initiative, Monterey College of Law (MCL) in California is distributing Apple iPads to all students enrolled in a supplemental curriculum program that helps them prepare for the state's bar exam. According to information released by the college, all entering first-year students signed up for the program within the first week, as did 70 percent of the remainder of the student body.

The college said the impetus for the program, which launched last week, was a perceived need to create studying opportunities outside of the classroom for its students, who, with a median age of 38, are typically full-time workers attending school in the evening. MCL has 36 incoming first-year students and a total of 105 students this year in its doctor of jurisprudence program.

"Many of our law students work the equivalent of three jobs. Between law school, work, and family, it is a constant challenge for them to set aside enough time during the week to study," said Wendy LaRiviere, dean of admissions, in a written statement issued today. "...[T]he iPad will provide time-challenged students an easy way to add 30 to 45 minutes of studying each day ... during a lunch break, waiting in the car-pool line, or even getting their oil changed. The result will be an additional three to five hours per week of valuable study time. If our students use this 'found' time to do additional reading and incorporate a more extensive use of their class notes, study guides, and practice exams, we expect to see a positive result in law school performance and continued improvement in the bar pass rates of our graduates."

The pilot program was developed in conjunction with BARBRI, the bar exam review/prep provider. BARBRI is providing MCL's supplemental curriculum program and has worked with the college to ensure that the students won't be absorbing the price of the iPads, according to Mitchel Winick, MCL president and dean.

"BARBRI provided a group pricing arrangement to the law school that allowed the cost of the iPad to be included without raising the total course cost to the student," he said. "The law school also paid part of the iPad cost to keep the total cost of the program, inclusive of the iPad, below the $3,800 published price of the BARBRI program."

The traditional BARBRI course, he explained, is a nine-week immersion program taken post-graduation to prepare for the bar exam. But for the pilot program, "We are working with BARBRI to divide the course materials into a supplemental curriculum that tracks our regular courses over the entire three- to four-year JD program," Winick said.

The iPads themselves, in addition to allowing students to take their studying with them, will be used for practice assessments and for participating in study groups.

"We are particularly interested in using iPad-based, multiple-choice practice exams during regular semesters to help students gauge their progress through bar-tested subjects," Winick told Campus Technology in an e-mail. "These online exams provide instant feedback and are linked to the substantive study guide so that students are directed back to the review materials on any questions they answer incorrectly. We also intend to use the iPads to develop virtual study groups, using programs such as WebEx, Skype, and Moodle to expand the group learning environment beyond the classroom."

As another part of the pilot, some MCL faculty members are being outfitted with iPads as well, specifically those who want to experiment with incorporating the iPad into classroom instruction. That will happen this academic year with a 10 to 12 instructors, according to Winick. The faculty pilot is expected to be expanded the following year.

According to law professor and faculty senate president Stephen Wagner, the idea isn't just to shake up old teaching methods. "The objective of the MCL faculty pilot program will be to develop examples of using iPad technology to enhance and expand traditional legal education without diminishing any of the core academic values," he said.

And, ultimately, Winick explained, the goal is to improve student outcomes.

"Law school challenges students to master an overwhelming body of information. If the iPad provides a more convenient, accessible ... and even entertaining way to learn ... students will spend more time with the course materials and be better prepared for class, the bar exam, and ultimately as practicing lawyers," he told us. "The objective indicators of success will be grades and bar pass rates. I believe that we will be able to review course grades at the end of this academic year and the results of the July 2011 California Bar Exam and have a good idea whether this program is having a positive impact."

Comments

Mon, Aug 30, 2010 Ryan

@Brian I'm glad to finally see some dissenting opinons in these stories about the higher education love fest for all things Apple. I am baffled that so many higher education institutions would go all in on the iPad just before droves of competitor devices running the latest Android OS (2.2) and Chrome OS are about to hit the market. These devices will have equal to better processors than the iPad, front facing cameras for videochatting, a mobile browser that has been demonstrated to literally run circles around the iPad's (http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/20/android-froyo-speed-ipad/), USB ports and *gasp* will run Flash. No matter what Steve Jobs says, there's nothing "magical" about a web experience that can't run the dominant video delivery format on the internet. Couple those specs with reports that these devices will be cheaper than ipads and will run on multiple carriers, and you have to think that maybe delaying the tablet experiments until Q4 10 or Q1 of 11 when there is better competition in the tablet market would be prudent. Not to mention that the iPad is a locked down device that is completely tied to the iTunes ecosystem, so universities that deploy these devices wil have to continue to go through Apple for their software. This is all great news for Apple as all of these institutions are playing right into their spin that iPad = tablet and setting themselves up for years of paying into Apple's premium pricing structure. Perhaps time will tell that this is the case as Apple's tablet version will reign supreme among it's competitors, but I'll wait to give those competitor's a chance before I commit my institution's time and money to any one company, no matter how cool their marketing might be.

Fri, Aug 27, 2010 hannah Los Angeles, CA

Very Cool. I heard that bar exam doctor (www.barexamdoctor.com) already has a website for students to do practice essays and performance tests online. I think I read that they are developing an Iphone App for students to take essays on their phone.

Wed, Aug 25, 2010 Mitch Winick Monterey College of Law

Brian, couple of thoughts . . . I like your student advocacy viewpoint and it is completely appropriate. As part of this pilot program, our current students will pay less than they would have otherwise . . . and get an iPad. The educational publisher (BAR BRI) is a unique source of law materials that 90+% of our students will purchase and use either during the JD program or as a post-graduate review program. Traditionally it would be delivered in print volumes. There are new iPad applications (and uses) that are being developed specifically for this program. In fact there are 16 e-books of review material that were made available this week only through iBooks. The text material is so voluminous that a smart phone delivery system is not appropriate . . . this is a case where size (and readability) does matter. Your technical points about the netbook are all correct. I have one of those as well. However, in this case it is not about hardware and specs . . . it is about individual engagement . . . and you really don't need a side by side technical analysis to confirm the excitement and level of personal engagement that the iPad delivers. Whether that converts to improvements in academic performance . . . I'll have to get back to you at the end of the year.

Wed, Aug 25, 2010 Brian

@Mitch": Sorry about my use of the phrase tablet. Let me scratch that an make it netbook. iPad can't beat a $299 netbook in price. I have an iPad, and a netbook, and an iPod Touch, and a smart phone. Of all those devices (as a student) the most universally functionally is the netbook (with webcam and mic built in). Did your college ever consider netbook pilots, tablet pc pilots and anything else other than iPads? Either now or in the past? Are you weighing use of the iPad in the College of Law against or versus any other device to get a side by side comparison of what truly is best for the students? Interface is something Apple is good it when compared to other products. But that alone does not warrant an exclusive pilot. I don't know anything about BARBRI, but sounds like an educational organization vendor , or other. Are they developing specific iPad apps for you institution's use? Can they develop the same apps for smart phone operating systems? Did you poll your students to see how many have web enabled smart phones already? In my opinion, students should not have to put any extra cost into a "pilot" program in a school. Period. That alone sets off some red flags for me.

Wed, Aug 25, 2010 Brian

@David and others: You want fast laptop startup times? Is that why the iPad is preferred (it is mentioned several times in the comments)? My suggestion is simply put your laptop or tablet into sleep mode and toggle out of it as needed. Don't fully shut down. There is no way I'm sold on the iPad being a better tool for students to "sneak in a few minutes here and there." That is not device dependent. The article specifically states several web based tools and site that are the focus of use on the these newly distributed iPad. Again, no need to have an iPad to look at web sites. Bootup speed is irrelevant. Can you annotate the books you read on the iPad? Annotate PDF files? From what I am hearing in the higher ed world, that simple task is very difficult on an iPad. @Mary: If the tablet is your tool of choice for annotating student work, isn't it logical that it would also be the tool of choice for students to annotate what they too are reading on screen? The problem I have with the iPad "pilots" is that there were very few "tablet" pilots when the tablet is definitely much more functional. Apple is good about linking up with vendors to provide "giveaways" to schools (iPod Touch, etc.). If the schools really were interested in "creating "found" time with the iPad...when you're looking to let students sneak in a few minutes here and there" they would have developed ways to distribute their content via apps for ANY mobile device the students may be using now (Blackberry, iPhone, Android based phone, etc.). Forcing the students into iPad use only is purely a high tech gimmick. Don't have the students purchase any other device when absolutely not necessary. How many of these students already have smart phones where they can easily access the internet to look up and use Webex, Skype, Moodle and more? Don't choose the tool and redefine the course content to fit use of that one tool. Flip it: redefine the course content so it fits on, and in, ANY tool. Get past the shiny and new Apple thing.

Wed, Aug 25, 2010 Mitch Winick Monterey College of Law

Brian, no doubt you are technologically correct about the tablet PC, but I think you may underestimate some of the real differences with the iPad beyond being "shiny and new". Price is 1/2 to 1/3 the cost of tablet PC's - an important factor for students (and school) budgets. User interface is just enough easier to remove one more barrier to student use. The engagement factor - probably what you write off as "shiny and gimmicky" is also no small thing when trying to get already busy students to increase study time. Weight and size are also important "ease of use" factors that increase the likelihood of additional study time. Finally, as I am sure most educators would agree . . . if the result is increased study time and improved performance . . . what is wrong with "shiny and new"? Dean Mitch Winick, Monterey College of Law

Wed, Aug 25, 2010 Mary F. Di Stefano Diaz Broward College, Davie, FL

An avid, loyal Tablet PC user and an avid, loyal iPad user, each machine serves very different function, and one does not exclude the other; I use both, and doing so has increased my productivity and improved my time management. As the iPad is thin, light, and small enough to fit into any laptop case, I routinely carry both my iPad and my Tablet PC. The following uses may help explain why a combination of both machines is just the right combination for me and may be just the combination for other faculty and students alike. The start-up time for the iPad is superior to any laptop/tablet/ACER-type wireless machine I have used (even faster than my iPhone) as is the longevity of each battery charge (longer than on my iPhone). Whenever I need to access the Internet and am pressed for time, the iPad is the machine I grab, so I can sneak in a look at e-mail or something I'm reading with insignificant (almost instanteous) wait time. Lightening access to the Internet and to an impressive array of specialized apps is an additional advantage of the iPad for me. Additionally, when reading documents and e-books, the iPad is hands-down "the quickest draw in the West" and most convenient vehicle for access to documents as accessing a document on the iPad from the "bookcase" requires no more than two screen "touches." The iPad's four viewing angles also make multiple-angle reading and sharing from an iPad ideal. Accessing multiple e-mail accounts (I have three) and managing e-mail is faster on the iPad. On the other hand, my Tablet PC is the machine I use when I want to import students' papers, use the sylus to mark these papers, and export them to a learning management system so that students can receive my comments in a timely fashion rather than being forced to take the time necessary to write comments using a keyboard (I can write with the stylus faster than I can type). The digital ink stylus allows me to write and highlight in varying colors. I have a color-coded system I have created to indicate to students the types of errors they are making (I teach ESL), so I can quickly highlight errors, comment on these errors and add feedback using the stylus so that students can revise their work and re-submit it to me via our learning management system. Both machines are out-of-this-word useful.

Wed, Aug 25, 2010 Editor

Joe, I'm not going to let factual errors stand here. You connect to an external display, including a projector, using a dock connector to VGA adapter. It's $29 (http://store.apple.com/us/product/MC552ZM/A). The iPad can also print. There is no USB type A port on the iPad, but the but its 30 pin dock connector connects via USB to any device, including a printer or USB hub, using the cable it comes with. --David Nagel

Wed, Aug 25, 2010 Joe OHIO

The I-pad at this point is just an giant I-Pod touch. Where is the video out port to connect to a projector and present with? No USB ports that might give the ability to print. Come on, there are many other tablets that would do a better job that is an actual computer. Maybe a generation or 2 away after they milk the early adopters.

Wed, Aug 25, 2010 Editor

Brian, you might be interested in our article "Style, but No Stylus." It's about the advantages of tablets over the iPad. In this case though, I thought this was an interesting approach: creating "found" time with the iPad. Is the iPad better than PCs and Mac laptops for that purpose when you're looking to let students sneak in a few minutes here and there? Granted, it will become less convenient when the OS becomes bloated and it takes five minutes just to start up, like some laptops and tablets today. But I think convenience and "instant on" might be big pluses given the premise. Thoughts? --David Nagel

Wed, Aug 25, 2010 Brian

Did any school (law school or other) ever provide regular tablet pcs to students as part of a pilot? Why iPad? I am not seeing any rationale to choose the iPad other than the fact that it is shiny and new. According to the info on page 2 of this article, they are using the iPad to access web based info. Big deal. If they thought that was really the important component here, they would have given them HP tablets (or any other brand) anywhere from 5-10 years ago. If you use the iPad to access web based info you are NOT doing anything innovative here. Just shiny, expensive, and new. Get off the "iPad as test pilot" bandwagon. It is a gimmick. An academic selling point to get students in.

Wed, Aug 25, 2010 David Arendale University of Minnesota

We are moving ahead to provide iPads to entering students in our College of Education and Human Development. Several items appear unique for the iPad and other tablet devices: a. easier mobility and use due to lighter weight b. equal access for all students c. tactile interaction with the tablet rather than a mouse and keyboard (even though an inexpensive bluetooth keyboard can be added for composing longer documents) d. use of software apps that are often very focused and specialized as well as general functional apps like word processing and such. And most are FREE! Best wishes to them and I look forward to reading about their pilot program and the lessons learned. Take care, David Arendale University of Minnesota

Add your Comment

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above