Course Redesign | Viewpoint

10 Rules of Teaching in this Century

We’ve been predicting a technology revolution for decades, and actually, it happened 5 years ago. We are now past the tipping point. Suddenly, we find that higher education no longer has a corner on knowledge-making and distribution. But on the bright side, the entire culture is learning-resource rich, technology has a more human face, and education has become more critical than ever.

As the revolution gathers momentum, many higher education institutions are clean-sheet redesigning teaching, learning, assessment, and career development. The 10 rules in this article suggest the depth of change that’s occurring on campuses right now.

These rules describe how to transform current teaching-centered practice to learning-centered practice, using the technologies of today.

Two basic 21st century laws frame these rules: First, the knowledge developed during the course does not pre-exist the course. Second, since the knowledge of the course does not exist before the course (because you and the students develop the knowledge during the course), your chief challenge is to manage the process of knowledge discovery. Here are the rules for how to do this:

1. Re-examine and adopt the move from teaching to learning. This principle gained prominence in the 1990s as a catch phrase, but with limited implementation, well before the tipping point in 2005. Now, there are many reasons to make this move and no longer reasons not to make the move. Before, it was hard to make the move because of the comparatively tiny resource set and the restricted learning opportunities compared to what is available today. Now, because learning resources and opportunities are infinite, make the move: Don’t just tell students the key knowledge in your field, but help them discover it through problem-based active learning. Change your curriculum from a list of what you will say to a list of essential problems (or questions) that students will address, with your guidance, throughout the semester.

2. Re-visit the accountability measures on your campus (usually called learning goals or learning outcomes) and re-structure them to fit the move you and others are making. As course design at your campus or in your courses starts to incorporate active learning approaches, rubrics based on the legacy curriculum need to change as well. It may well be better to re-state learning outcomes in terms of essential problems and the research associated with those essential problems, and build rubrics based on the problems within a problem-based learning structure.

3. Make a corollary change in assessment, once this move from teaching to learning is underway in your course or course of study: Move most assessment activity away from testing and toward evaluation of student evidence of learning. Student evidence of learning is now easy to capture and store. In the new paradigm of active and varied learning, testing is less appropriate but assessing student evidence is more appropriate.

4. Insist on teaching only in technology-enabled classrooms. Information technology is the default learning technology of today. Campuses have spent millions of dollars on management systems such as the SIS, ERPs, and CRMs because they knew they had to. Now, to stay in business, they must spend millions more to finish the job of building learning spaces for the current learning paradigm: 100 percent “smart classrooms.” These learning spaces must allow all students to have access to the Net while they are in the learning space.

5. Make sure your students have technology management tools of their own as they take on active learning challenges. Campuses spend hundreds of thousands of dollars each year on management systems for faculty, for them to teach. But, as you and your campus make the move from teaching to learning, students must also have tools to manage their own resources and evidence, not just during a course, but 24/7 while they are enrolled, including between semesters.

6. Insist on faculty having management tools for their own professional development to support annual review or a request for promotion or tenure. You, as a faculty member, must be as adept as your students in using Web-based applications, and there is no better way to learn the new breed of applications than to use them yourself for important professional purposes.

7. Do not discard the lecture or class discussion approach when appropriate, but use it primarily for the purpose of helping students address the essential problems of the course: Use lectures and discussions to help students to make progress in their projects and therefore to build their course portfolios.

8. Make sure your students have a digital repository of some sort--a portfolio system, a wiki, a blog, a Web page builder, a place to store and manage the evidence of their active learning.

9. Require your students to interpret their collected online evidence at regular intervals and, finally, in capstone Web presentations.

10. Make the collection of evidence the primary work of the course. In other words, students should be graded largely or entirely on their final portfolio for the course. In a learning-centered course, the portfolio is the sine qua non.

These rules apply to any course, any field, or any kind of formal learning sequence. The rules describe what is necessary to adapt to and celebrate the millennial change we’ve just gone through.

The 20th century economy, led by the industrial sector, has morphed radically into the knowledge economy, an economy of ideas and innovation. This new economy is not yet generating the wealth of the old economy. Therefore, in order to regain our economic vitality, education needs to be the primary engine. The four years of traditional undergraduate education has taken on a new urgency: Because the vitality of our economy now arises from innovation, college graduates must be allowed to be innovators. The ten rules provide the path.

 

Comments

Thu, May 26, 2011 saadia syed Lahore, Pakistan

New age is about learn, unlearn and relearn. Technology integration in course contents should be encouraged in developing countries.As technology makes learning easy and this learning remains life long while cramming ends with the academic years. On this page nice strategies are being discussed.

Mon, May 16, 2011 Jan Harrell Portsmouth, VA

What this article covers is not really a new approach to teaching, but a return to old approaches. Read any article on Soccrates' teaching method, or the Piaget approach to teaching an learning and you will see that htis was in practice centuries ago, and again re-proposed but never realized not that long ago. This method bases itself in the fact that sending out mounds of information is worthless if we are not helping or facilitating the students ability to absorb, retain and recite the information. Most learners do not possess an eidetic memory and therefor have to work at commiting information to memory. The new learning based approach starts the student down the right road of learning by basing our curiculum around the idea that we can help improve the intake of information from the moment it leaves our mouth and enters their ears. Blandly reading a powerpoint is not even close to the best method...

Sun, Apr 24, 2011 Gervas australia

I still like the old method when there were not hight technoly and student should not need to use calculators for a very simple issue. I can still seach and get the answer on net but before the answer should come into your mind after studies and understand. It is ok with the technology but we could not forget where this comes from.Nowdays teaching methods are improved by the evolution but we try to ignore that before this , those people basing on what they were having from themselves ,started to slowly thinking because their mind full of individual practices not because the ne internet issues. that is why there is not too much advanced discoeries . For me i still believe that a teacher is the main student and it is good idea to, after guiding the students depending on the choice of the teaching techniques you can still be there but they need attations.

Sun, Nov 14, 2010 vinay pathak India, Lucknow

An outstanding stategy to enhance and inculcate the stream of education in the veins of the learners

Wed, Sep 22, 2010 Barry

Agreed, content is important, but it should not be the focus. Teaching thinking skills should be the focus, in my opinion, with the content being the medium we use to teach these skills.

Wed, Sep 22, 2010

When you see so many students coming to your college who don't even have a grade-school understanding of math, science, and English it's hard to think of adopting any system that doesn't teach hard core facts.

Sun, Sep 19, 2010 Anthony HS teacher, NYC

It seems as if the author is suggesting an approach to teaching that prompts us and challenges us to break away from centuries of educational norms and culture. But in reality Mr. Baston has returned to a method of learning that has existed well before our time and calling for a renaissance in learning. We should recall that in many ancient Eastern and Western cultures young people were asked questions to solve and return with their field experiences and then were questioned some more and returned to the field again to seek out more answers in order to develop their knowledge and wisdom. Today, “the field” in many ways is easier to access because of technology. I do concur that the basic foundations of information or issue should be laid out and assessed for understanding. Once that is accomplished this method can be just as powerful as it was long ago. When the author talks of research it doesn’t necessarily mean sitting behind the laptop all day. Big mistake, since problem based learning is much more exciting and on-hands than that. Problem/Project based student centered learning requires interviewing, video and photo journaling, traveling to different museums and institutions, skyping, podcasting, reporting, blogging, and creating. Hence utilizing the tools that the world is using to work, communicate, create, collaborate, solve, and make sense of our world. It takes more thoughtful front loading and resources to set this type of learning experience up, however this is what will generate excitement, self-confidence, and experience in our youth. The drop-out rate at the secondary and post-secondary level is too high for us not to move in the direction of such powerful learning. Let's not resist new ideas but look at their strengths and make it work for us. Peace & Respect. Anthony

Sat, Sep 18, 2010

As a long-time teacher, I have found that the students who do not have the basics (factual information) have no idea as to what to apply when, so although many methods may work, factual knowledge is a pre-requisite for application. Often, I have taught that you have to know the rules to be able to break them. All else is guess-work. Relating this to technology in education, one must realize that the use of technology in (and out) of the classroom is nothing more than a different presentation system. Students without facts have no basis for projects, decisions, applications or whatever they are called to do in the real world. Go before a building committee and tell them that you know what they want built, but you have no idea as to what materials to use. Simply, you lose the bid and will be looking for another way to earn a living.

Thu, Sep 16, 2010

Some of the responses show the same flaws as the article. The internet has indeed changed how children (and those who act like children) think, but it has not been a positive change. Unfortunately for "new" concepts in education, the "old" real world wins every time: facts are facts. "Ain't it awful" isn't the point. Isn't it a stupid, inapplicable, and inappropriate way to "educate" students. We end up with students that are adroit in texting, but have no factual content. LOLcat is amusing, but not when you need a new hire who can communicate electronically and in person, can actually do maths higher than arithmetic, and is aware of actual scientific facts (not internet trivia). As "awful" as it may sound, since when did uneducated, inexperienced students drive the curriculum in any meaningful direction? If this sounds didactic or unreasonable, consider: do you want a new hire with a "great portfolio" from "teh intarweb", or do you want a doctor (engineer, lab tech, craft worker, air traffic controller, or even, yes, a *teacher*) who actually knows the subject or field they're working in? Also worthy of consideration are the lost millions (or more) of dollars of badly or incompetent work, and the resultant necessary effort to fix or educate or train workers (especially "knowledge" workers) up to a usable level.

Thu, Sep 16, 2010

It is possible to present fact based curriculum in a model of learner discovery and research in education supports this on myriad levels. Technology is one tool in a spectrum of other teaching-learning experience. Teachers should not feel that they are being compelled to 'give up' knowledge or discipline, but to augment their practice with new ways of thinking, and knowing the material we want students to learn. It can also be done one step at a time, for both students and teachers, in a mutual learning process.

Thu, Sep 16, 2010 Kevin Wilcoxon Las Vegas NV

Something the great "lecturers" fail to recognize is what the internet and all its associated gadgets have done to restructure how (not just) young brains function, just as writing has done in the past. Minds are malleable and structure themselves according to the medium. No amount of "Ain't it awful" will change the situation and you will continue to lose your audience. Get this: You are no longer the fountain of all knowledge. There are indeed objective facts, but we can't stop there; learners must learn how to use information. Telling ain't the way.

Thu, Sep 16, 2010

More evidence that the, now discredited, Dept. of Education is trying to take over the process of teaching for all fields of study. I don't want my future nursing students to be using a portfolio when in the hospital situation, to look up the technical names of any part of the body when given directions by a pharmacists or a Doctor. Math and science are fact based and until the Dept of Education understands that fact based education, measured by fact based tests, is necessary we will continue to fall behind the rest of the world in educating our students for real world situations not subjective and magical thinking.

Thu, Sep 16, 2010

Seems to take a great deal of space to say some very ordinary things dressed up in technophilia!

Thu, Sep 16, 2010

To sum it up, in the near future, students will be judged not by what they know but instead by how much they accumulate in their portfolios (the new "evidence of learning").

Wed, Sep 15, 2010 Instructorpayan Los Angeles

Reset and redesign of postsec education for the 21st century. Much like an athlete we educators must stay on top of our game by investing in ourselves and learning from our students to guide and prepare them for a challenging economy where there are NO jobs for life. I am a community college instructor and lead my students to knowledge and believe like the great educator Paulo Friere that our students OUR not vessels to be filled with facts and figures.

Wed, Sep 15, 2010

I'm on board! But can someone please "learn" me how to squeeze all of this into a 16 hour work day!?

Wed, Sep 15, 2010

Hmm. A couple of questions might be in order here. Regarding #1: (The move from "teaching" to "learning".) I was always under the impression that in the ideal structure, teachers taught, and students learned. This article implies that teachers would be learning more than teaching, which makes little sense. Yes, the teachers do "learn" how a particular student acts or reacts, but for the most part, the teacher would not be doing "knowledge discovery" (a process more akin to research, where one assesses large amounts of information to discern or derive new facts about the information). Regarding #2 & 3: Aren't all learning outcomes or assessments currently problem-based? Learning assessments are based on problem solving, usually referred to as "tests", "quizzes", "finals", etc. Considering the amount of information educators typically cover in a semester, tests provide a fairly accurate assessment. When "assessing student evidence", both content control and format (showing compliance) and of course, the actual content itself (hopefully showing capability -- even mastery) show up in projects and final papers, just as is done in current "teaching" environments (and has for many years prior). Regarding #4 - #9: Again, using electrons rather than dead trees, fine, I get it. It's like using a shiny pen instead of a boring old pencil, though. Technology is not a panacea; students do not automatically comprehend at a deeper level, nor does the quality of their work improve when they are no longer limited to 256 colors. The quality of tools used rarely dictates the quality of the result; indeed, can even obscure or misrepresent the result. For example, spell-checkers do not guarantee better spellers. #10: Quantity over quality? Volume over comprehension? Again, "learning" centered doesn't seem to be different from "teaching" centered, as both methods (at least, theoretically) should be focused on one result: what the student takes away in their head. But it does sound *much* cooler. "New" teaching concepts come and go, and students continue to suffer from them. "Whole language". "New" maths. Fill-in-the-blank Studies. But "information" hasn't changed. "Knowledge" hasn't changed. The need for appropriate skillsets hasn't changed. There is an increasingly larger and more detailed body of knowledge available, but while technology makes many things easier, it apparently does not make cutting through the dross and getting down to results any different than it has been for the last 2000 years. Form never takes precedence over content or function or results ... unless all one is teaching (or the students are "learning") is form. And in a real world that (as always) requires real results, form just isn't enough.

Wed, Sep 15, 2010

Yawn. Everything old is new again, and ever will be.

Wed, Sep 15, 2010

Great article on redesign. Empowering students to take on the role of an education designer as a plan for success.

Add your Comment

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above