Educause Guidance for Higher Ed Leaders: Basics of Data Privacy Oversight, Transparency, and Compliance

A new Showcase Series from Educause, titled “Privacy and Cybersecurity 101,” offers guidance for higher education leaders on pressing issues of the day: data privacy, information security, and institutional transparency around both.

Everyone is talking about data privacy and security, Educause’s post says, but “how many of us in higher education understand the role we play in data use and protection, realize how we can help students gain clarity about what these issues mean for them, and are aware of what lies ahead for compliance requirements?”

The first key step, dubbed “The Intention-Protection Connection,” is a clear explanation from leaders of higher education institutions that lays out what kind of data will be collected, how it will be used, and how it will be protected, Educause said.

The Educause post features a video Q&A with Ben Archer, privacy manager at Arizona State University, which starts with Archer explaining why data privacy literacy is a foundational requirement for higher education leaders.

The brief video explains such things as why education leaders not only need to practice data privacy literacy but also should be capitalizing on the “opportunity to show students how their data should be handled.”

The Educause post then delves into the importance of transparency by higher education institutions around data collection, data use, and data privacy — basing its guidance on results of a broad survey conducted last year, “Student Data Privacy and Security: A Call for Transparent Practices."

The resulting report from that survey explains why students feel like they cannot trust their institution without transparency about the institution's data privacy and information security practices, and it further explains how data privacy and infosec are equity issues.

Finally, Educause advises IT practitioners and leaders at higher education institutions to continue working toward full compliance with federal infosec guidelines using the NIST SP 800-171 Toolkit. “Campus leaders need to understand the requirements, the ways those requirements might run counter to the higher education values of openness and collaboration, and how to demonstrate institutional compliance,” Educause said.

Learn more and access the guidance materials at the Educause website.

About the Author

Kristal Kuykendall is editor, 1105 Media Education Group. She can be reached at [email protected].


Featured

  • Digital cyberspace with particles and Digital data

    Report: AI Is Moving Faster than Data Trust

    AI agents are already in use or pilot at most organizations, but data visibility, governance and precision recovery capabilities have not kept pace, according to Veeam's new Data & AI Trust Gap report.

  • Glowing route lines merging into single gold pathway

    Microsoft Merges Copilot Apps Into a Single User Experience

    Microsoft recently announced it is consolidating its consumer Copilot app and Microsoft 365 Copilot app into a single destination, addressing a fragmented product strategy that has required users to navigate separate applications for AI chat and productivity tools.

  • CIS Sandbox Tutor Eli Blouin at Bentley University imagines a future technology learning partner that supports curiosity, critical thinking, feedback, and personalized learning.

    Student Voices: Technology as a Future Learning Partner

    A data analytics and marketing major at Bentley University and a distinguished lecturer at the university explore the future of "technology learning partners" — technologies that participate in the learning process by asking questions and giving feedback, not just information search results.

  • Silhouettes of business professionals stand against a blurred futuristic city skyline at night, with a glowing digital network data connection

    It's Time for Higher Ed to Get Serious About AI Strategy

    Without a coordinated strategy that involves multiple academic and administrative units across the entire campus, colleges risk wasting resources, duplicating efforts, and ultimately failing to deliver on the promise of deploying technology to improve learning and operations.