Organizations Report Positive ROI on AI Investments, Yet Data Readiness and Oversight Lag Behind

Enterprises are reporting benefits from artificial intelligence even as their data preparation and oversight processes remain incomplete, according to a survey by data and AI services provider Further.

The company's recent State of Enterprise AI Maturity research surveyed 515 U.S.-based AI decision-makers. Just 5% believed their organizations' data was largely ready for AI.

The findings suggest that gaining value from individual AI applications and preparing to operate them more broadly are separate challenges. Reported returns alone do not establish that an organization has the foundations to sustain or expand those results.

Data Problems Accompany Project Setbacks

Further found that 37% of respondents' organizations had paused, scaled back, or abandoned an underperforming AI initiative in the previous 12 months. Among that group, data quality or availability was the most frequently cited main reason, at 24%.

Meanwhile, 29% reported completing a formal data audit and remediation plan. The research also placed 69% of organizations in the exploring, experimenting, or implementing stages of adoption.

Further distinguishes data prepared for conventional reporting from data prepared for AI. Its explanation emphasizes data origins and documentation, along with access controls that support ongoing evaluation and governance.

For readers assessing their own readiness, the practical issue is whether data supports the requirements of a particular application. A collection suitable for a dashboard may need additional preparation before it can reliably support an AI system.

Reported Returns Do Not Establish Oversight

Seventy-seven percent reported a positive return on AI investment. However, only 3% said their organizations had a documented AI-audit process.

The findings measure different things: perceived financial benefit and the existence of a repeatable oversight process. Neither substitutes for the other.

"In reality, confidence without a documented process is exposure," said Kierra Dotson, associate director of AI strategy and governance at Further. "Closing that gap doesn't take new technology; it requires an auditable governance process."

The full report is available here on the Further site (registration required).

Featured

  • networked node grid featuring illuminated connectors

    Infrastructure Accounts for More than Half of Worldwide AI Spending

    Gartner forecasts worldwide AI spending will reach $2.67 trillion in 2026, up 49.5% from 2025, with AI infrastructure accounting for nearly $1.5 trillion, or about 56% of the total. For every dollar Gartner expects to be spent on generative AI models, more than $52 will be spent on infrastructure.

  • Hootsuite

    Beyond the Feed: How Higher Ed Turns Social Media Into a Measurable Enrollment Engine

    More than half of prospective students research programs on social media before visiting a university website, and nearly half will skip applying to a school that looks inactive online. Hootsuite, the all-in-one social OS platform trusted by more than 2,000 higher education institutions, helps campus teams turn everyday posts into measurable outcomes, from applications to alumni giving.

  • AI artificial intelligence interface over laptop keyboard

    New Microsoft AI Code of Conduct Emphasizes Human Control

    Microsoft has published a draft code of conduct that details how its homegrown AI models should behave, with human control taking priority over model capability, autonomy, and even task completion.

  • man and woman analyzing data on computer screen

    Before You Replace the Legacy ERP, Learn What It Is Actually Doing

    The closer an organization gets to replacing a legacy system, the less inclined it may be to invest in that system. Yet that is also a period when understanding the legacy environment becomes particularly important.