2007 Campus Technology Innovators Entry Form
NOMINATION SUBMITTED BY
Name:
Title:
Institution:
E-Mail:
Phone:
NOMINEE INFORMATION
Project Lead Name:
Department:
Other Primary Team Contributors (if applicable):
Name of Project/Initiative:
URL of Project (if applicable):
Vendor Partners Involved (please list companies and contact information):
PROJECT DETAILS
The Challenge or Inspiration
Key Beneficiaries Who on campus or elsewhere benefits from the technology implementation? (e.g., faculty, entering freshman class, administrators) In what way? [Please answer in 75 words or less]:
Results What has been or will be the impact of the technology? Include direct impact and trickle-down impact, such as greater student yield/retention, competitive edge for institution, etc. [Please answer in 75 words or less]:
Suprises and 'Ah Hah!' Moments What were the surprises? What were the unforeseen stumbling blocks? Please share the obstacles or unintended consequences those tackling similar implementations might not anticipate. Include anecdotal information, proudest moments, etc. [Please answer in 75 words or less]:
TECHNOLOGY CHOICES
Short List List top five products considered for the project.
Additional Technologies List three to five final product choices/vendors.
Reasons for Technology Choices Why did you choose the products you did? Include differentiating factors (reasons why you chose one product over another), primary and secondary reasons, and include any campus models or mentors that helped you make the decision. Did this product replace any other technology/product? If so, what? (Include “rip and replace” and/or “phase-in” information) [Please answer in 100 words or less]:
Next Steps What are your next steps (if applicable)? Now that your initial implementation is successful, what will you do next? Why? [Please answer in 75 words or less]:
Advice What advice would you give to others facing similar challenges to those you originally identified, or to those looking at the same type of technology implementation? [Please answer in 75 words or less]:
Additional Information Please include any additional supporting information, including additional supporting URLs. [Please answer in 75 words or less]:
E-Mail this page
Printable Format
The vast majority of education organizations (98%) expect their AI infrastructure budgets to either increase or hold steady over the next year, according to a recent report from cloud storage provider Wasabi.
With the proliferation of AI and advanced technology, education leaders have an opportunity to find and implement the right solutions to make a difference for learners. This March 9-12, SXSW EDU 2026 is your chance to discover innovative edtech, connect with trailblazing peers, and find strategies that make an impact.
Anthropic has released Claude Opus 4.6, introducing a million-token context window and automated agent coordination features as the AI company seeks to expand beyond software development into broader enterprise applications.
Snowflake and OpenAI have announced a multi-year, $200 million partnership that will make OpenAI models available on Snowflake's platform.
More
More Portals
More Webcasts
More White Papers