Bb Directions | Viewpoint

Not Your Grandfather's Blackboard? My Recent Chat with Bb Learn President Ray Henderson

Blackboard's product strategy has moved from that of a course management platform to a suite of integrated, enterprise systems that span a range of institution-wide services from communications to e-commerce. And Blackboard leadership--including Blackboard Learn President Ray Henderson--has placed a new emphasis on client support and openness. Trent Batson spoke with Henderson about the company's new direction.

Blackboard and other LMS providers, almost alone, took teaching and learning from an exclusive classroom centricity to the multi-centricity of the virtual world in just one decade between 1996 and 2006, when the Web 2.0 revolution blossomed and other technologies then accelerated the change.

At times during the period since 1996, Blackboard in particular felt the growing pains of the revolution and did have its rough patches with the education market. Yet whatever your views of Blackboard, the company and the platform have been and continue to be major influences on the direction of the education enterprise throughout the world. Today, Blackboard executives assert that they've been listening much more closely to their clients, have added a number of new solutions, and are no longer the Blackboard we have known in the past. Recently, I talked with Ray Henderson, president of Blackboard Learn, to find out more about what he calls "the new Blackboard."

Ray Henderson was the chief products officer at Angel Learning until Angel was merged with Blackboard, and Henderson was then made president of the largest Blackboard platform group: Blackboard Learn, which comprises the company's online teaching and learning technologies. (The other groups are Bb Transact, Bb Connect, Bb Mobile, and Bb Collaborate, for a total of five).

Henderson noted in his talk at Bb World last summer that Angel, as a platform, had been rated more highly by customers than Bb for quality. Yet, when he took up his new post at Bb, he found that Bb had much larger teams of people dedicated to aspects of quality. Under Henderson's leadership, these teams were strengthened and partly reorganized. And just in the first year of the resulting multi-service approach Blackboard is taking, client surveys and focus sessions show a marked improvement in client support, transparency, openness, and quality. In all four of these areas, Henderson says that Bb has "improved"--which is just short of what he is aiming for: "excellence."

Has any of this effort resulted from the incursions of Sakai and Moodle? "We are, of course, aware of Sakai and Moodle, but the improvements we are making are just part of our ongoing efforts," Henderson said. Still, in a humorous video played at Bb World before Henderson talked, a mysterious employee sitting at the conference table while Henderson led the meeting had a name tag that said "Sakai," perhaps a nod to Blackboard's increased focus on openness. The company has focused on greater interoperability and flexibility for its LMS and collaboration technologies that are sometimes used in tandem with open source or with other commercial LMS solutions.

Blackboard has an increasingly diverse spread in the world. It is a growing company that has branched out with the acquisition of Wimba and Elluminate (now part of the Blackboard Collaborate platform group), with the addition of online security and e-commerce for students to transact business with the institution (Blackboard Transact), the addition of mass notification capabilities (Blackboard Connect), and the ability to use mobile technologies with Blackboard's LMS and in support of overall student life and services on campus (Blackboard Mobile).

The core is still Blackboard Learn, where the course management platform lives, but the company now offers the extension of enterprise management systems to all academic transactions for faculty and students (as we see in the paragraph above). Today, one may still say "we moved from Blackboard to Sakai," but that statement will look increasingly uninformed: What part of Blackboard do you mean? If you use all the platforms in the Blackboard suite, it becomes quite a chore to find a way to replace all functions. I have to wonder, what other company can offer this sweep of capabilities for educators at all levels of education throughout the world?

The next-generation Bb Learn platform, 9.x, was released earlier this past year (2010). Blackboard continues the Angel tradition, and its own, of actively supporting open standards, specifically now with the full support of IMS's Common Cartridge and LTI (Learning Tools Interoperability) standards for 9.x. Bb also now recognizes formally that the users own the data stored in Bb tools and now supports open data. This is one area Henderson points to with pride and rates "openness" more highly than any other criteria he uses for Bb performance. "When I first came to Blackboard, people told me that Blackboard is too closed. We needed to be more transparent," he said.

Henderson's vision for openness has extended to improvements to Blackboard Learn as a platform for development. For years Blackboard has allowed third-party developers to customize and extend Blackboard Learn with open APIs, and today there is a growing number of Building Blocks (built from those open APIs) available throughout the community. This past year (2010), Blackboard opened up access to its database for the first time, enabling better vision into system data and reporting to inform system performance management to academic program decisions. With this move, Blackboard seems to be recognizing the value of community involvement in the improvement of the software.

On behalf of openness and transparency, Ray Henderson writes a blog, appears at user group meetings, grants many interviews (such as the one this article is based on), and is generally available to educators and students.

When asked about portfolios, Henderson responded, "There are no announcements coming soon." But, of course, WebCT has a portfolio, as does Angel, and it would seem to me that Blackboard would wish to address this student-management-of-their-own-learning gap in some way.

Education technology folks have often said that course management systems, because they have mostly reinforced the teaching-centered learning model of the past, are not revolutionary technologies. They are the status-quo technologies. That has been a common opinion of many leaders and commentators for the past decade. With the new array of solutions, however, judgment is more dicey: If the Blackboard suite of tools is helping to populate and enable the virtual campus, it is really not the status quo any longer, but a major force in moving education, and education institutions, into the digital age.

It is hard to look at the new Blackboard capabilities and not see evidence of the tidal shift away from classroom centricity. In the early 2000s, those of us working in academic computing offices, as I did, often said that no matter what one might think of WebCT or Blackboard, "at least they were getting faculty onto the Web." But, now, once on the Web, both faculty and students find a second campus, and this campus has no parking problems.

Editor's note: This article has been modified since its original publication to correct a factual error. Ray Henderson was not, as previously stated, CEO of Angel Learning or of Blackboard Learn. He was chief products officer at Angel and is now president of Blackboard Learn. [Last updated Jan. 5, 2011 at 10:11 a.m.] --David Nagel

Comments

Thu, Jan 6, 2011 Ed Garay UIC

Blackboard has always been a good company and product for our campus. Sure, the grass is always greener on the other side and Blackboard (like all other educational technology service and system providers) are far from perfect, but their software works and we have not found the need to put our university through the arduous process of migrating and learning to use another system. In general, most university faculty members everywhere prefer not to change things; the silent majority dislikes major changes, so I am very glad we haven't had the need to alter a significant aspect of our teaching and learning infrastructure. Ray Henderson has been a great addition to Blackboard's leadership. We need to clone him and beam him out here and there. I particularly appreciate how he has personalize all the good will of the Blackboard employees, along with sincere and tangible deliveries in support of IMS standards, openness and interoperability, not to mention leading developments in mobile learning and modern avenues of digital communication to enhance and facilitate education. Thank you, Ray, and keep up the good work. We have an endless number of things left to do, improve and discover. Greetings from Chicago.

Thu, Jan 6, 2011 Lynn Zingraf

To: Educator tired of "improvements' which are NOT. I'm the Sr. Director of support for ANGEL in Indianapolis. I'd like to understand more about the problems you are having to see if we can help. Please send me an email at lynn.zingraf@blackboard.com and I'll hook you up with one of our support technicians. Thanks.

Thu, Jan 6, 2011 Joseph Scudder Northern Illinois University

The first comment could have easily been written by me. Many new features are more cumbersome. For instance, the now gone Digital Dropbox was a much easier process. Blackboard is slow to fix known issues. For example,the above mentioned Digital Dropbox feature had known issues for years with things like not allowing special characters in the file names of documents being uploaded. A simple message about these characters not being permitted int he file name would have solved a majority of such problems. Among those faculty who use it often, there have been many known issues that are left unfixed until a new version is issued. There have been many faults with the grade book. For years there was no easy way to include extra credit assignments. Yes, there were ways to work around these limitations, but the preferred methods were cumbersome. Moreover, there were not easy options to have multiple grading tracks in the same classroom. This was very problematic in very large sections. Blackboard is particularly a problem in large classes in the 200 plus range. Some features bog down in very large classes. I sometimes want to keep track of whether and when students have accessed each assignment. In my 200 person class I have readings and questions for each day, 10-15 quizzes, a term paper, and three tests. I like to track class performance by which resources were accessed. Blackboard chokes on our university system if I try to download this data for a 200 person class for an entire semester or even breaking it into two parts. One of the more obnoxious limitations for a person in a large class is the inability of Blackboard to correctly match an Excel file with quiz and test results that come from our Testing Services. The Excel file has to have exactly the same number of students in the correct order as they are in Blackboard. I spend an average of 90 minutes per quiz or exam carefully checking the Excel file against the Blackboard roster. Blackboard has not been able to handle merging files accurately for students with the same last name and same first initial. Students sometimes omit the initial. A merge feature should not be that hard to do if there is a common ID as a key to match. Of course, students sometimes do record their ID numbers incorrectly. Blackboard could then issue a report of the records failing to match. Blackboard apparently is not testing its products on large classes with real instructors before they release their new versions. They need to have actual faculty providing input from actual use and not rely on campus IT people to relay our problems. They seem to have no clue when faculty will be really upset with a change like they are currently with the disappearance of the Digital Dropbox feature.

Thu, Jan 6, 2011 Educator tired of "improvements' which are NOT

The move to more open source in Angel has created some productivity issues for faculty - we now need to click multiple times to do the same thing we did before the moved to the open source components - why call something an improvement when in fact it is nothing more than people trying to jump on the same bandwagon decrying what works and trying to sell us a bill of goods about the "great" features of open source - I want what works and improves my productivity not what someone thinks is better (IT geeks - not engaged in what is needed) only to find now I spend twice or more of my time figuring out just how to copy and paste - which used to be simple 2 clicks and done - now it's a minimum of 4 - 5 clicks and one is never sure if it'll work - often it does not.

Wed, Jan 5, 2011

My cohort gives him a passing grade but they should have done it sooner to be honest. And they need to do something in portfolios to help accred preps or they will lose clients

Wed, Jan 5, 2011 not_a_fan California

Relative to version 8, the Blackboard 9 LMS has been a disaster for our faculty. It's painfully slow overall on a fast CPU and pipe, the gradebook in particular is simply no longer reliable. Adding new whizzy web 2.0 features while allowing the performance of the core product to degrade is certainly a curious set of tactics. It's equally interesting to see the company branching out into new niche markets, while it ignores the significant problems of its flagship product. New Coke, anyone?

Wed, Jan 5, 2011 Edutech

Ray's the first executive since Matthew Pittinsky left that shows understanding and passion for education. It's good for Bb and we do see good changes. I think he knows open source is a threat and is waking the place up about service to distinguish it from moodle.

Wed, Jan 5, 2011 angel fangirl

My institution was bummed about this merger and we wanted to quit. But we decided to give Ray a chance and renewed. We've been stable. We've seen more realism, not empty promises as we saw when we were webct clients acquired by bb. They're now shipping things. Angel support is still great. And my bb-user colleagues tell me there's finally been real improvement. Everyone hopes he doesn't quit. But he should change mobile options to include verizon!

Wed, Jan 5, 2011 Trent Batson RI

Thanks for the correction. And we try to be so accurate! cheers Trent

Wed, Jan 5, 2011

Quick Correction - Henderson was not the CEO at ANGEL Learning. Christopher Clapp was. Ray Henderson was VP of Products.

Add your Comment

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above