Penn State Develops Virtual Reality for Distance Education

Engineering students at Penn State have developed an immersive virtual reality (IVR) system with the potential to provide distance education students with an immersive, tactile classroom experience.

The system uses the Oculus Rift IVR headset developed by Oculus VR, a haptic glove and interactive 3-D simulations. The students developed the haptic glove, which is still in its prototype phase and lets the person wearing it manipulate and interact with virtual objects. With the help of Unity3D software, they also developed the 3-D simulations, which include a giant game of Jenga and an activity that starts with pieces of a coffee maker scattered on a table and lets people assemble the virtual appliance.

According to Conrad Tucker, assistant professor of engineering design and industrial engineering at Penn State and the project's supervisor, the system offers a great opportunity to improve the online learning experience for distance education students.

"Online learning gives us huge opportunities in higher education. You can connect with more diverse people across greater distances, for example," said Tucker in a prepared statement. "But online courses also limit you in some ways — there's little immersive or tactile interaction, and sometimes it's hard for students to engage with the material. IVR systems are a potential solution to that problem."

Tucker has recently completed a study that compares student performance of a task in the IVR environment with their performance of the same task in a non-immersive computer program using a keyboard and mouse. His study found that students could complete the task in the IVR environment in less than half the time than in the non-immersive online environment. According to Tucker, one of the reasons for the difference in performance is that "IVR systems give you a much more natural experience."

Tucker said he sees the potential for IVR to improve the educational experience for all students, including those in a brick-and-mortar classroom, because they can use the IVR system to travel to distant locations or even back in time.

The paper about the study will be published in the upcoming ASME 2015 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference.

The project is funded by a Center for Online Innovation in Learning (COIL) Research Initiation Grant (RIG).

About the Author

Leila Meyer is a technology writer based in British Columbia. She can be reached at [email protected].

Featured

  • Three cubes of noticeably increasing sizes are arranged in a straight row on a subtle abstract background

    A Sense of Scale

    Gardner Campbell explores the notion of scale in education and shares some of his own experience "playing with scale" — scaling up and/or scaling down — in an English course at VCU.

  • AI-inspired background pattern with geometric shapes and fine lines in muted blue and gray on a dark background

    IBM Releases Granite 3.0 Family of Advanced AI Models

    IBM has introduced its most advanced family of AI models to date, Granite 3.0, at its annual TechXchange event. The new models were developed to provide a combination of performance, flexibility, and autonomy that outperforms or matches similarly sized models from leading providers on a range of benchmarks.

  • minimalist bookcase filled with textbooks featuring vibrant, solid-colored spines with no text, and a prominent number "25" displayed on one of the shelves

    OpenStax Celebrates 25th Anniversary

    OpenStax is celebrating its 25th anniversary as 2024 comes to a close. The open educational resources initiative from Rice University has served almost 37 million students in 153 countries and saved students nearly $3 billion in course material costs since its launch in 1999.

  • a professional worker in business casual attire interacting with a large screen displaying a generative AI interface in a modern office

    Study: Generative AI Could Inhibit Critical Thinking

    A new study on how knowledge workers engage in critical thinking found that workers with higher confidence in generative AI technology tend to employ less critical thinking to AI-generated outputs than workers with higher confidence in personal skills.