Admissions Officers Go Online for Fuller Picture of Student Applicants

Four in 10 admissions officers hit up the social media pages of college applicants. Most (89 percent) do so rarely, but more than 1 in 10 (11 percent) do so "often." At the same time, the practice of "Googling" has remained steady at 29 percent.

While 37 percent of these institutional representatives reported that what they've found online has "positively impacted" a candidate's application, an equivalent number said just the opposite.

Those findings come from a survey of almost 400 admissions officers by Kaplan Test Prep. Respondents told the test preparation company that certain triggers compel them to go online in order to enhance their understanding of applicants beyond what has already been provided, such as standardized test scores and grade point average. Reasons include:

  • To learn more about an interest or talent. Often the applicants themselves will invite the school rep to visit a social media page to see examples of their work, such as music, art or writing;
  • To verify awards out of the norm. If an application cites a "particularly distinguished or noteworthy" award, the admissions officer may attempt to verify the claim online;
  • To seek out criminal records or other actions. Respondents told Kaplan that they do this in order to uncover more details when an applicant mentions a criminal background or some type of disciplinary action; and
  • As a background check for scholarship seekers or because the school has received an anonymous tip about a prospect that doesn't put him or her in the best light.

The positive findings that may surface include leadership roles or volunteer work that wasn't mentioned in the application. Negative findings might include photos of drug or alcohol use or some other form of inappropriate behavior.

"The growth of social media hasn't made college admissions a whole new ballgame, but it's definitely impacted the rules," said Yariv Alpher, Kaplan's executive director and head of market research. His advice: "Think about what you share. When in doubt, the best strategy may be to keep it to yourself."

About the Author

Dian Schaffhauser is a former senior contributing editor for 1105 Media's education publications THE Journal, Campus Technology and Spaces4Learning.

Featured

  • Digital Network of User Profiles and Data Connections

    Microsoft, RSA Make Identity Security Push in the Age of AI

    Two of the bigger authentication announcements to come out of the recent RSA Conference both point in the same direction: Organizations need a more flexible, unified approach to identity security, especially as AI agents start acting alongside human workers.

  • AI logo near computer equipment

    White House Releases National Policy Framework for AI

    The White House has released a four-page AI policy framework aimed at setting a national approach to AI, with priorities including child safety, intellectual property protections, truth and accuracy guardrails, and worker training for an AI-driven economy.

  • Profile silhouette of a person thoughtfully touching their chin, overlaid with transparent data visualizations and digital interface elements suggesting artificial intelligence and analytics.

    The Institutional Knowledge Shift Is Reshaping Higher Ed IT

    Higher education IT leaders are navigating a quiet but consequential transition: Experienced team members are retiring or leaving for private-sector roles, and the teams replacing them are smaller, newer, and often stretched thin. The result is a structural shift in how technology decisions are made, executed, and sustained.

  • Abstract digital data stream with binary code and colorful light trails

    Microsoft Releases Open Source AI Safety Tools for Agent Development

    Microsoft released RAMPART and Clarity as open-source projects intended to help developers test AI agents earlier in the software lifecycle and turn red-team findings into repeatable engineering checks.