Laws Prohibit or Restrict Municipal Broadband Networks in 20-Plus States

Laws in more than 20 states restrict or prohibit local governments from building their own broadband networks, according to a report released today by the Education Commission of the States.

In six states — Alabama, Colorado, Louisiana, Minnesota, North Carolina and Utah — a referendum is required by localities seeking to offer broadband service.

In three states — Alabama, North Carolina and Tennessee — public providers are only permitted to provide services within their service limits or territory. In addition, some states like Florida, Louisiana and Utah require a feasibility study or proof of profitability.

In five states — Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, Texas and Washington — statutory language prohibits municipal broadband. For example, in Nevada, cities with more than 25,000 residents and counties with more than 55,000 residents are prohibited from selling telecommunications services.

The reasons for the restrictions and prohibitions against broadband vary state to state. However, some of the reasons include the following arguments:

  • Government broadband networks should not compete with private providers because they have inherent advantages, like rights of way and public financing, which significantly reduce the costs associated with entry into broadband markets.
  • Providing broadband can be a high-risk endeavor, and if the network fails, taxpayers face significant financial liability.
  • Public funds used for broadband are taken away from higher priority systems, including roads, electric grid updates and water systems.
  • Municipal broadband discourages private sector investment.

“Where private markets have underserved or failed to serve communities, municipal broadband networks have the potential to increase access to internet service,” wrote the authors of the report, Lauren Sisneros and Brian A. Sponsler, who are employed by the Education Commission of the States, a nonprofit organization. “Expanding broadband to these communities is a critical component of holistic efforts to provide the infrastructure necessary to support higher education access and success for non-traditional and geographically isolated student populations — populations that have a significant impact on achievement of state educational attainment goals.”

The authors concluded that it is vital that state and local leadership understand the ways state laws can impact the provision of local broadband and fair online access to their constituents. The full report is available on the commission’s website.

The Education Commission of the States was founded in 1965 by John W. Gardner, president of the Carnegie Corporation of New York, and Terry Sanford, former governor of North Carolina. Its headquarters is in Denver.

The commission is non-partisan and focuses on pre-K through postsecondary education research, with a particular interest in policy, said Amy Skinner, director of communications for the organization.

About the Author

Richard Chang is associate editor of THE Journal. He can be reached at [email protected].

Featured

  • student reading a book with a brain, a protective hand, a computer monitor showing education icons, gears, and leaves

    4 Steps to Responsible AI Implementation

    Researchers at the University of Kansas Center for Innovation, Design & Digital Learning (CIDDL) have published a new framework for the responsible implementation of artificial intelligence at all levels of education.

  • three glowing stacks of tech-themed icons

    Research: LLMs Need a Translation Layer to Launch Complex Cyber Attacks

    While large language models have been touted for their potential in cybersecurity, they are still far from executing real-world cyber attacks — unless given help from a new kind of abstraction layer, according to researchers at Carnegie Mellon University and Anthropic.

  • Hand holding a stylus over a tablet with futuristic risk management icons

    Why Universities Are Ransomware's Easy Target: Lessons from the 23% Surge

    Academic environments face heightened risk because their collaboration-driven environments are inherently open, making them more susceptible to attack, while the high-value research data they hold makes them an especially attractive target. The question is not if this data will be targeted, but whether universities can defend it swiftly enough against increasingly AI-powered threats.

  • magnifying glass revealing the letters AI

    New Tool Tracks Unauthorized AI Usage Across Organizations

    DevOps platform provider JFrog is taking aim at a growing challenge for enterprises: users deploying AI tools without IT approval.