1 in 4 Campuses Have Never Tested Crisis Management Plan

Nearly a quarter of colleges and universities have never tested their campus crisis response plan, and, of those that have, only a third said they found the plan effective in dealing with a crisis. Those are some of the results of a proprietary survey designed to gauge the effectiveness of crisis response on college and university campuses. Academic Impressions, which holds events for higher education, did the survey through e-mail in January 2010 and received responses from administrators in admissions, student affairs, business/planning, human resources, and campus leadership at institutions across the country.

According to the results, 54 percent of institutions have tested their crisis response plan in the last year; 23 percent have never tested their plans. The largest obstacles to executing tests, according to the research, were timing (67 percent), participation (43 percent), budget (40 percent), and securing campus-wide buy-in (36 percent).

The survey also found that 51 percent of schools have had a crisis on their campus in the last two years; and a third of respondents have low or no confidence in their institution's ability to execute the plan in the event of an emergency. Only a fifth of respondents said their campuses had annual meetings to brief the relevant people on the crisis response plan.

"In the wake of several high-profile campus crises, the importance of regular evaluation and testing of crisis management plans is critical to ensuring a coordinated, multi-departmental campus response," said Marla Whipple, conference director at Academic Impressions. "Institutions should implement and adhere to foundational testing protocols to increase preparedness for environmental, facility, and human-caused incidents."

The company offered this advice for developing a crisis response plan:

1. Set a schedule for testing, reviewing, and revising the plan. Amend plans based on what participants learn from practice tests and from evaluating successes and failures of other schools' emergency management protocol.

2. Develop a graduated set of achievable tests, starting with basic drills and increasing the complexity over time. The company said that reaching the stage where a full-scale crisis simulation can take place could take years.

3. Mix up the drills and exercises conducted annually, testing different functions, scenarios, and activities. This approach gives stakeholders practice in responding to the variety of crisis situations that can affect a campus, including environmental, facility, and human-caused incidents.

About the Author

Dian Schaffhauser is a former senior contributing editor for 1105 Media's education publications THE Journal, Campus Technology and Spaces4Learning.

Featured

  • Abstract Network of Blue and Orange Lines

    Tech Industry Leaders Launch Open Secure AI Alliance

    NVIDIA and 36 other partners are targeting agent security across multi-vendor clouds by combining open technologies for workload identity, agent controls, vulnerability scanning, and software supply-chain security.

  • Abstract neural network 3D illustration

    Intel® AI EmpowerED: The AI-Ready Campus, Delivered

    Artificial intelligence is transforming higher education, prompting institutions to rethink how they manage infrastructure, security, governance, and workforce readiness. Successful adoption requires a strategic, institution-wide approach that aligns AI initiatives with educational goals, faculty enablement, and scalable operational frameworks.

  • shattered digital cloud with red warning alert icons

    CSA's Top Cloud Threats: Identity, AI

    Cloud Security Alliance's 2026 Top Threats report ranks identity first while adding two AI-related risks to its list of 11 leading cloud security concerns.

  • Neon blue security locks with a single red highlight

    AI Shifts Cybersecurity Focus from Finding Flaws to Fixing Them

    For decades, one of cybersecurity's most difficult challenges has been finding vulnerabilities before attackers do. A growing number of security professionals now say artificial intelligence is changing that equation, shifting the focus from discovering flaws to fixing them quickly enough to prevent exploitation.