New Framework Offers Way to Validate OER Commitment, Sincerity

A new report proposes a framework by which open educational resource initiatives — and particularly those promulgated by for-profit organizations — might be measured. "Toward a Sustainable OER Ecosystem: The Case for OER Stewardship" has three purposes according to its authors: to help make sure "the OER community's values can be maintained as the movement scales"; to gauge the practices of "new entrants" to the OER field (especially those out to make money from it); and to build educator confidence in participating in OER, including those who contribute their own materials and may be uncertain regarding its use by for-profit publishers.

The CARE framework, as it's called, is applicable to all OER stakeholders — or "stewards," as the framework refers to them. Those include individuals, schools and affiliated organizations, both nonprofit and for-profit.

CARE is an acronym for four processes OER stewards need to maintain to show their "duty of care to the broader OER movement":

  • Contribute: Stewards need to contribute to the work of OER, whether in the form of funding or "in-kind" contributions, to perpetuate the "awareness, improvement and distribution" of OER;
  • Attribute: Stewards make sure to credit those who have created or remixed OER;
  • Release: Stewards help to make OER materials available in a form that can be released and used beyond the course and platform in which it was created or distributed; and
  • Empower: Stewards "strive to meet the diverse needs of all learners" and encourage participation by "new and non-traditional voices in OER creation and adoption."

The next step for the framework, according to Doug Levin, co-author of the report and president of EdTech Strategies, is to solicit stakeholder reaction, "to see what questions get raised and where we may have missed the mark or omitted something important."

"This isn't intended to be a document that orgs would sign on to, but there are many ways that it can be used to build a consensus in the field about expectations for those who want to work with OER and gain the support of the community," Levin explained.

Levin, along with his co-authors, Lisa Petrides, CEO and founder of the Institute for the Study of Knowledge Management in Education, and C. Edward Watson, an associate vice president at the Association of American Colleges and Universities, expects to present on the framework at education events over the coming year. The group also plans to release follow-up supplemental materials shortly, such as example practices "to help operationalize the framework and make it more concrete," he said. After that, "we'll see where we go."

The paper is posted online at a new website and was distributed under a Creative Commons CC BY SA license.

About the Author

Dian Schaffhauser is a former senior contributing editor for 1105 Media's education publications THE Journal, Campus Technology and Spaces4Learning.

Featured

  • abstract malware attack

    Report: AI Ransomware Can Now Run Much of an Attack Without Human Help

    Ransomware attacks are becoming more automated, and AI could take that much further, according to global cybersecurity company NCC Group's July 2026 threat intelligence report.

  • AI artificial intelligence interface over laptop keyboard

    New Microsoft AI Code of Conduct Emphasizes Human Control

    Microsoft has published a draft code of conduct that details how its homegrown AI models should behave, with human control taking priority over model capability, autonomy, and even task completion.

  • Image of digital screen with data and math formulas on black background

    AI Giants Report Advances in Mathematical Research

    OpenAI has published what it says is an AI-generated solution to the Navier-Stokes existence and smoothness problem, one of mathematics' seven Millennium Prize Problems, while Anthropic has reported separate advances in research mathematics and formal proof generation.

  • man viewing holographic display of data and code

    Why Cross-Skilling Is the Smartest Investment a Campus IT Team Can Make

    Higher education IT teams are being asked to keep pace with AI, cloud, and cybersecurity on flat budgets, and hiring a specialist for every new need can no longer keep up. Building adjacent skills across the people already on staff creates more agile, resilient teams that move faster and retain talent without adding headcount. Pluralsight makes the strategy work through skill assessments, tailored learning paths, hands-on labs and sandboxes, and microlearning that fits into the flow of work.