Stats

Are You Satisfied?

The IMS Global Learning Consortium spots learning technology satisfaction and trends.

Stats

Product categories relevant to course delivery and course management systems (CMS)—assessment, capture, authoring, presentation and collaboration, digital content, and CMS—rated higher for satisfaction than other learning technology services, portals, and most notably, student information systems. Source: IMS GLC Learning Technology Satisfaction and Trends, 2007.

THE IMS GLOBAL LEARNING CONSORTIUM released the latest report in its ongoing study of “Learning Technology Satisfaction and Trends” in February, based on responses from about 200 leaders of internet-supported learning initiatives in North American higher education. The report is issued in different versions for the public, respondents, and IMS members and subscribers. Access to the public report and summary rankings can be found here.

While IMS views the research as still being “in its infancy and preliminary,” and has the intention of evolving the study over time, the organization has presented some intriguing trend data from the past year.

Stats

The IMS GLC study cuts across a wide spectrum of technologies that support or enable learning at higher education institutions, so the “top ten” vendor/ product ratings include a mix of technologies, from course management systems (CMS) and mobile learning devices, to content search tools. Source: IMS GLC Learning Technology Satisfaction and Trends, 2007.

The IMS GLC study tracks satisfaction both for general product categories and for particular vendors and product offerings. Some product categories ancillary to course management systems (CMS)—such as capture, authoring, and digital content—were rated higher for satisfaction than the CMS category itself, suggesting a strong interest in interactivity and rich media content. Among the CMS, eCollege, Angel Learning, and Moodle (not in the top ten, with a rating of 3.43) were rated higher for satisfaction than either market leader Blackboard (rating: 2.97) or its WebCT property (rating: 2.87). The report pointed to the appearance of high ratings for Google, Wikipedia, and Apple’s iPod, “indicating that non-education-specific technologies are being perceived, by those that incorporate them, as adding value to the educational experience.”

Editor’s note: IMS Global Learning Consortium CEO Rob Abel will present “What Is the Learning Impact of the Technology- Empowered Education You Deliver?” at Campus Technology 2007 in Washington, DC, July 30-Aug. 2.

Featured

  • artificial intelligence on laptop

    OpenAI to Combine AI Products into Desktop 'Superapp'

    OpenAI is reportedly developing a desktop application that would combine several of its emerging AI products into a single platform, according to reports, marking the latest step in the company's effort to transform ChatGPT from a standalone chatbot into a broader productivity and automation environment.

  • woman surrounded by virtual hologram icons

    Beyond AI Adoption: Designing Learning for an Age of Abundant Intelligence

    Higher education was designed for a world in which access to knowledge, expertise, feedback, mentorship, and authentic learning experiences were inherently scarce. By making many forms of intelligence increasingly abundant, AI is inherently redefining the existing paradigm.

  • digital brain with network connections

    Microsoft Moving to Internally Developed AI Models in Office Apps

    Microsoft is reportedly using its own in-house artificial intelligence models to handle some workloads in Excel and Outlook, offering new evidence that the company is moving its AI strategy beyond model development and into large-scale cost reduction.

  • Profile silhouette of a person thoughtfully touching their chin, overlaid with transparent data visualizations and digital interface elements suggesting artificial intelligence and analytics.

    The Institutional Knowledge Shift Is Reshaping Higher Ed IT

    Higher education IT leaders are navigating a quiet but consequential transition: Experienced team members are retiring or leaving for private-sector roles, and the teams replacing them are smaller, newer, and often stretched thin. The result is a structural shift in how technology decisions are made, executed, and sustained.