Stats

Are You Satisfied?

The IMS Global Learning Consortium spots learning technology satisfaction and trends.

Stats

Product categories relevant to course delivery and course management systems (CMS)—assessment, capture, authoring, presentation and collaboration, digital content, and CMS—rated higher for satisfaction than other learning technology services, portals, and most notably, student information systems. Source: IMS GLC Learning Technology Satisfaction and Trends, 2007.

THE IMS GLOBAL LEARNING CONSORTIUM released the latest report in its ongoing study of “Learning Technology Satisfaction and Trends” in February, based on responses from about 200 leaders of internet-supported learning initiatives in North American higher education. The report is issued in different versions for the public, respondents, and IMS members and subscribers. Access to the public report and summary rankings can be found here.

While IMS views the research as still being “in its infancy and preliminary,” and has the intention of evolving the study over time, the organization has presented some intriguing trend data from the past year.

Stats

The IMS GLC study cuts across a wide spectrum of technologies that support or enable learning at higher education institutions, so the “top ten” vendor/ product ratings include a mix of technologies, from course management systems (CMS) and mobile learning devices, to content search tools. Source: IMS GLC Learning Technology Satisfaction and Trends, 2007.

The IMS GLC study tracks satisfaction both for general product categories and for particular vendors and product offerings. Some product categories ancillary to course management systems (CMS)—such as capture, authoring, and digital content—were rated higher for satisfaction than the CMS category itself, suggesting a strong interest in interactivity and rich media content. Among the CMS, eCollege, Angel Learning, and Moodle (not in the top ten, with a rating of 3.43) were rated higher for satisfaction than either market leader Blackboard (rating: 2.97) or its WebCT property (rating: 2.87). The report pointed to the appearance of high ratings for Google, Wikipedia, and Apple’s iPod, “indicating that non-education-specific technologies are being perceived, by those that incorporate them, as adding value to the educational experience.”

Editor’s note: IMS Global Learning Consortium CEO Rob Abel will present “What Is the Learning Impact of the Technology- Empowered Education You Deliver?” at Campus Technology 2007 in Washington, DC, July 30-Aug. 2.

Featured

  • modern college building with circuit and brain motifs

    Anthropic Launches Claude for Education

    Anthropic has announced a version of its Claude AI assistant tailored for higher education institutions. Claude for Education "gives academic institutions secure, reliable AI access for their entire community," the company said, to enable colleges and universities to develop and implement AI-enabled approaches across teaching, learning, and administration.

  • SXSW EDU

    SXSW EDU 2025 on Higher Education and Ever-changing Technology

    Join education's most passionate community this March 3-6, 2025 at a special 15th-annual SXSW EDU Conference & Festival in Austin, Texas.

  • AI robot with cybersecurity symbol on its chest

    Microsoft Adds New Agentic AI Tools to Security Copilot

    Microsoft has announced a major expansion of its AI-powered cybersecurity platform, introducing a suite of autonomous agents to help organizations counter rising threats and manage the growing complexity of cloud and AI security.

  • Abstract widescreen image with geometric shapes, flowing lines, and digital elements like graphs and data points in soft blue and white gradients.

    5 Trends to Watch in Higher Education for 2025

    In 2025, the trends shaping higher education reflect a continuous transformation of the higher education landscape to meet the changing needs of students and staff, while maintaining sustainable and cost-effective institutional practices.