Skip to main content
Add as a preferred source on Google


New MIT Supercomputer Is Designed for AI

The TX-GAIA combines nearly 100 Intel processors and 900 Nvidia GPU accelerators to create a system optimized for artificial intelligence applications.

  • By Sara Friedman
  • 10/03/19
MIT supercomputer facility

TX-GAIA is housed inside of a new EcoPOD, manufactured by Hewlett Packard Enterprise, at the site of the Lincoln Laboratory Supercomputing Center in Holyoke, Massachusetts. Photo: Glen Cooper.

The Lincoln Laboratory Supercomputing Center (LLSC) is getting a major upgrade. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology affiliated organization has a new supercomputer called TX-GAIA that was built by Hewlett Packard Enterprise.

The system leverages nearly 100 Intel processors and 900 Nvidia GPU accelerators to combine high-performance computing with hardware optimized for AI. TX-GAIA was built based on the HPE Apollo system. The supercomputer is currently ranked as the most powerful artificial intelligence supercomputer at any university in the world by TOP500. 

"We are thrilled by the opportunity to enable researchers across Lincoln and MIT to achieve incredible scientific and engineering breakthroughs," said Jeremy Kepner, an LLSC fellow who heads the LLSC. "TX-GAIA will play a large role in supporting AI, physical simulation and data analysis across all Laboratory missions."

TX-GAIA is specifically designed to perform deep neural network operations (DNN) quickly. DNNs are currently used for speech recognition and computer vision applications, such as powering Amazon's Alexa or helping self-driving cars recognize objects in their surroundings.

The latest system will also be used to crunch terabytes of data to train machine learning algorithms and support LLSC's research and development initiatives. Scientists at LLSC are working to find new ways to improve weather forecasting, accelerate medical data analysis, build autonomous systems, design synthetic DNA and develop new materials and devices.

TX-GAIA is housed in a new modular data center at the LLSC's green, hydroelectrically powered site in Holyoke, MA.

About the Author

Sara Friedman is a reporter/producer for Campus Technology, THE Journal and STEAM Universe covering education policy and a wide range of other public-sector IT topics.

Friedman is a graduate of Ithaca College, where she studied journalism, politics and international communications.

Friedman can be contacted at [email protected] or follow her on Twitter @SaraEFriedman.

Click here for previous articles by Friedman.


Featured

  • young man hand working on a laptop, bokeh blurred at night

    Redesigned Copilot Will Build Apps and Work on Its Own

    Microsoft recently announced that it's redesigning Copilot, the company's all-encompassing AI assistant, so users can hand off complex tasks, build tools by describing what they need and assign work to an agent that keeps going after they log off.

  • digital brain integrating legal regulation and security interface

    Agentic AI Moves from Pilot Phase to Production, Bringing Governance to the Forefront

    New research from Caylent, an AI-focused Amazon Web Services Premier Tier Services Partner, found that enterprises are already moving agentic AI beyond pilots and into production environments. At the same time, organizations are putting strict conditions around autonomy, making governance and control the next major challenge for enterprise AI adoption.

  • Abstract Network of Blue and Orange Lines

    Tech Industry Leaders Launch Open Secure AI Alliance

    NVIDIA and 36 other partners are targeting agent security across multi-vendor clouds by combining open technologies for workload identity, agent controls, vulnerability scanning, and software supply-chain security.

  • Businessman using laptop to analyze and control information security data

    Survey Reveals Data Governance Enforcement Gap for Agentic AI Tools

    According to a new report, 99.7% of IT and security leaders surveyed by identity security company Delinea said their organization has a formal policy governing what data AI tools and agents are permitted to access. Yet only about 51% said AI access is checked against those policies in real time.