Encouraging Good Student Contact

The primary tenet of good undergraduate teaching is "encourage student-faculty contact." At least that's how important it is to Arthur W. Chickering and Zelda F. Gamson, whose book, Applying the Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education (1991), ranks best practices (www.msu.edu/user/coddejos/seven.htm).

Few deny the desirability of more interaction. But the devil is in the details. How can a single professor interact meaningfully with 100, 200, or 300 students each term, and simultaneously have a life? How can students interact with 5, 10, or 15 professors, and simultaneously have a life?

For me, the key is to avoid contact for contact's sake. Instead, design courses and curricula to move through three distinct stages of contact. At first, contact must emphasize trust building: Students must trust that their professors care about their learning, and professors must come to trust that students have the ability and desire to learn. Once trust is built, the danger is too much low-productivity contact. During the second stage, students must be guided toward contact that is focused on the distinctive expertise of their professor. At stage three, students must be encouraged to rely less upon frequent contact with their professors. They need to build self respect and alternative support networks.

One of my pet peeves is the tendency for our smallest classes to be concentrated in the senior year, at the very time when students need comparatively less help from their professors. But that subject is for another day.

Let's focus on the individual course. Contact for the sake of trust-building will usually be concentrated in the first several weeks, and then taper off. Contact that emphasizes independence will usually build to its zenith at the end of the course. Focused contact will be emphasized throughout, with its highest concentration during the heart of the course. The exact mix of types of contact will vary by professorial style, student need, institutional ethos, subject matter, length of term, available technology, and the level of the course. And the three stages are not discrete.

Some of the strategies for building trust through student-faculty contact might include:

  • Ask students to complete a pre-course survey, preferably electronically.
  • E-mail a welcome to each student, prior to the first class.
  • Build a personal Web site that allows students to know you better as a professional and as a person.
  • Sometime during the term, individually e-mail each student a word of encouragement.

To facilitate coaching and clarification contact:

  • Ask each student to e-mail their "muddiest point," or their most confusing area in the assigned readings.
  • Encourage students to sign up online for face-to-face office hours.
  • Create an FAQ file for the course.
  • Around class time, arrive early and linger after class.

To promote and encourage mature partnership contact:

  • Inform the students when you are transitioning toward independence.
  • Encourage students to check with each other before consulting you.
  • Encourage former students to volunteer as consultants to current class members.
  • Continue communicating through listserv or group e-mail with members of a class, even after the term is over.
  • Create a departmental Web site about career opportunities in the field, and urge students to consult it.

Contact for the sake of trust. Contact for the sake of coaching and clarification. Contacts characteristic of a mature partnership. Technology enhances possibilities in all three domains.

About the Author

David Brown ([email protected]) is vice president and dean of the International Center for Computer Enhanced Learning at Wake Forest University.

Featured

  • glowing AI symbol integrated into a stylized cloud icon, surrounded by interconnected digital nodes and translucent security shields, set against a gradient white-to-blue background with grid lines and abstract risk charts

    Cloud Security Alliance Report Plots Path to Trustworthy AI

    A new report from the Cloud Security Alliance highlights the need for AI audits that extend beyond regulatory compliance, and advocates for a risk-based, comprehensive methodology designed to foster trust in rapidly evolving intelligent systems.

  • Abstract geometric pattern with interconnected nodes and lines

    Microsoft 365 Copilot Gets Expanded AI Capabilities, Collaboration Tools

    Microsoft has announced the next updates to its Microsoft 365 Copilot AI assistant, including expanded AI capabilities in individual apps, the ability to create autonomous agents, and a new AI-powered collaboration workspace.

  • Abstract widescreen image with geometric shapes, flowing lines, and digital elements like graphs and data points in soft blue and white gradients.

    5 Trends to Watch in Higher Education for 2025

    In 2025, the trends shaping higher education reflect a continuous transformation of the higher education landscape to meet the changing needs of students and staff, while maintaining sustainable and cost-effective institutional practices.

  • AI-inspired background pattern with geometric shapes and fine lines in muted blue and gray on a dark background

    IBM Releases Granite 3.0 Family of Advanced AI Models

    IBM has introduced its most advanced family of AI models to date, Granite 3.0, at its annual TechXchange event. The new models were developed to provide a combination of performance, flexibility, and autonomy that outperforms or matches similarly sized models from leading providers on a range of benchmarks.