Encouraging Good Student Contact

The primary tenet of good undergraduate teaching is "encourage student-faculty contact." At least that's how important it is to Arthur W. Chickering and Zelda F. Gamson, whose book, Applying the Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education (1991), ranks best practices (www.msu.edu/user/coddejos/seven.htm).

Few deny the desirability of more interaction. But the devil is in the details. How can a single professor interact meaningfully with 100, 200, or 300 students each term, and simultaneously have a life? How can students interact with 5, 10, or 15 professors, and simultaneously have a life?

For me, the key is to avoid contact for contact's sake. Instead, design courses and curricula to move through three distinct stages of contact. At first, contact must emphasize trust building: Students must trust that their professors care about their learning, and professors must come to trust that students have the ability and desire to learn. Once trust is built, the danger is too much low-productivity contact. During the second stage, students must be guided toward contact that is focused on the distinctive expertise of their professor. At stage three, students must be encouraged to rely less upon frequent contact with their professors. They need to build self respect and alternative support networks.

One of my pet peeves is the tendency for our smallest classes to be concentrated in the senior year, at the very time when students need comparatively less help from their professors. But that subject is for another day.

Let's focus on the individual course. Contact for the sake of trust-building will usually be concentrated in the first several weeks, and then taper off. Contact that emphasizes independence will usually build to its zenith at the end of the course. Focused contact will be emphasized throughout, with its highest concentration during the heart of the course. The exact mix of types of contact will vary by professorial style, student need, institutional ethos, subject matter, length of term, available technology, and the level of the course. And the three stages are not discrete.

Some of the strategies for building trust through student-faculty contact might include:

  • Ask students to complete a pre-course survey, preferably electronically.
  • E-mail a welcome to each student, prior to the first class.
  • Build a personal Web site that allows students to know you better as a professional and as a person.
  • Sometime during the term, individually e-mail each student a word of encouragement.

To facilitate coaching and clarification contact:

  • Ask each student to e-mail their "muddiest point," or their most confusing area in the assigned readings.
  • Encourage students to sign up online for face-to-face office hours.
  • Create an FAQ file for the course.
  • Around class time, arrive early and linger after class.

To promote and encourage mature partnership contact:

  • Inform the students when you are transitioning toward independence.
  • Encourage students to check with each other before consulting you.
  • Encourage former students to volunteer as consultants to current class members.
  • Continue communicating through listserv or group e-mail with members of a class, even after the term is over.
  • Create a departmental Web site about career opportunities in the field, and urge students to consult it.

Contact for the sake of trust. Contact for the sake of coaching and clarification. Contacts characteristic of a mature partnership. Technology enhances possibilities in all three domains.

About the Author

David Brown ([email protected]) is vice president and dean of the International Center for Computer Enhanced Learning at Wake Forest University.

Featured

  • Abstract Network of Blue and Orange Lines

    Tech Industry Leaders Launch Open Secure AI Alliance

    NVIDIA and 36 other partners are targeting agent security across multi-vendor clouds by combining open technologies for workload identity, agent controls, vulnerability scanning, and software supply-chain security.

  • Abstract neural network 3D illustration

    Intel® AI EmpowerED: The AI-Ready Campus, Delivered

    Artificial intelligence is transforming higher education, prompting institutions to rethink how they manage infrastructure, security, governance, and workforce readiness. Successful adoption requires a strategic, institution-wide approach that aligns AI initiatives with educational goals, faculty enablement, and scalable operational frameworks.

  • shattered digital cloud with red warning alert icons

    CSA's Top Cloud Threats: Identity, AI

    Cloud Security Alliance's 2026 Top Threats report ranks identity first while adding two AI-related risks to its list of 11 leading cloud security concerns.

  • Neon blue security locks with a single red highlight

    AI Shifts Cybersecurity Focus from Finding Flaws to Fixing Them

    For decades, one of cybersecurity's most difficult challenges has been finding vulnerabilities before attackers do. A growing number of security professionals now say artificial intelligence is changing that equation, shifting the focus from discovering flaws to fixing them quickly enough to prevent exploitation.