Special Series: Technology and the CEO >> [Part 3] Technology Conveniences
        
        
        
         In this third part of our series, a look at the basic needs for a campus 
  community in the 21st century. 
By Rosemary E. Jeffries, RSM
We all expect instant communication, ease and speed in computation, constant 
  access to information, and lighter and smaller devices to travel with us everywhere. 
  The conveniences of technology in the 21st century are expected like the hot 
  and cold running water, electricity, heat, air conditioning, air travel, and 
  24-hour communication that made their way into our expectations through the 
  20th century. Each convenience of our modern society promised greater ease for 
  living or greater ease for connecting people. 
Today’s technology promises the same ease for living and, certainly, 
  for access to information. It equally promises greater capability for connecting 
  with people near and far, in consistent ways. Clearly, to attract, serve, and 
  retain students and faculty in the technology-rich culture of this first decade 
  of the 21st century will require staying current in a rapidly changing environment. 
			
				
					"For this generation of technology-savvy prospective students, nine o'clock in the evening is the best time to shop for a college."
				
			 
In fact, the expectations for technology and the actual development of technological 
  capacity are accelerating at an even faster rate than our 20th century conveniences. 
  For example, commercial broadcast television developed and marketed in the 1920s 
  took a long time to catch on. Now in the 21st century, about 98 percent of households 
  have a television, and 70 percent or more households report having two or more 
  televisions. Yet, it took 60 years or more for TV to become an expected household 
  convenience (Source: 2004 World Almanac). 
By contrast, Apple and IBM marketed the first personal computers in 1975, and 
  by 2001, one billion PCs had been manufactured and sold. The next billion is 
  expected to be shipped and sold within the next five to six years. By 2001, only 
  26 years after the first personal computers were introduced, 56 percent of households 
  had a computer and 50 percent had an Internet connection (Source: 2004 World 
  Almanac).
 In about half the time it took television to become a major part of life, 
  computers and the Internet are now expected elements of life. As we approach 
  the midpoint of the first decade of the 21st century, the integration and influence 
  of technology in everyday life—and definitely in the college campus world—is 
  pervasive. 
The accelerated inclusion of technology into household, work, and education 
  environments increases the expectations of students and faculty coming to institutions 
  of higher education. In these centers of learning and research, they expect 
  not only the convenience of 21st century technology, but the access to technology 
  that supports and keeps pace with their intellectual careers and their personal 
  lives. 
The traditional-aged students coming to college today grew up with technology, 
  using computers in kindergarten, getting their own cell phones by 8th grade, 
  and watching the first and second Iraqi conflicts, live, in their homes. This 
  generation of students d'es not see technology as an added value in their lives; 
  rather, they see technology as an expected convenience. As Howe and Strauss 
  sum up in 
Millenials Go to College (Neil Howe and William Strauss, 
  American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers, 2003), 
  “Millenials take digital technology for granted
institutions that 
  are paleotech—not wired with powerful intranets, PowerPoint tools and 
  the latest information retrieval systems—will face a real handicap when 
  recruiting students, and not just in technology fields.” 
Though faculty and older students did not grow up with technology in the same 
  way, they too are users with clear expectations. Today’s faculty rely 
  on technology to store and manipulate data easily, aid their research, facilitate 
  their class management, and keep them in touch with students and colleagues. 
  The older student, often returning to school while balancing work and family, 
  expects the convenience of accessing class notes online, registering online, 
  and, in general, staying connected through technology. Everyone has accepted 
  the more accelerated pace of new technology as we watch technology prices come 
  down, and PCs and other computing and communications devices become smaller 
  and lighter and ever more convenient. 
Beyond the campus, prospective students and faculty access their 
  first glimpse of the campus through the Web presence available. 
  Making Web presence and response compelling and engaging through personalization 
  tools is as critical as providing stunning streaming video of the campus and 
  campus activities. The use of portals facilitates the possibility of gaining 
  immediate information about prospective students who are shopping the Web. Using 
  e-mail response direct to the prospect launches an initial relationship between 
  the institution and the student. In short, technology changes the recruitment 
  business for students. 
				
					"To attract, serve, and retain students and faculty in this technology-rich culture will require staying current in a rapidly changing environment."
				
			 
Technology also provides an initial view of the campus to a prospective faculty 
  candidate, well in advance of the campus visit. The 24/7 access to information—and 
  even communication for students and faculty through enhanced technology— 
  accommodates each person’s schedule. The number of hits to our Web page 
  between 9 and 10 pm is, on average, 6,450 per month. Nine o’clock in the 
  evening is usually not the time most admissions folks answer inquiries; yet, 
  for this generation of technology-savvy prospective students, nine in the evening 
  is the best time to shop for a college. Faculty who find the 5:30 to 6:30 morning 
  quiet time as the best time to post class assignments or bibliography are equally 
  serviced by technology, which allows them to work when they feel most inspired. 
  Technology enhances the exchange between faculty and students, while at the 
  same time allowing for the differences in lifestyle. 
How the 21st century campus uses technology to attract and serve students and 
  faculty is clear and compelling. History tells us that the advancement of new 
  devices for connecting and accessing information will improve at a rapid pace 
  and will move beyond even what we can imagine. Keeping pace with the advances 
  in this area is critical to keeping campuses current and cutting edge. 
Yet, more important than the way it brings convenience to campus life, technology 
  helps to establish immediate relationships that are essential to the 21st century 
  campus, offering an initial relationship between the prospective student and 
  the institution, or establishing a more consistent relationship between the 
  enrolled student and the professor. Technology also launches the relationship 
  between the prospective faculty candidate and the campus. It is these various 
  relationships that support the ability of a college to attract students and 
  faculty, but ultimately, technology enhances relationships that serve both students 
  and faculty, and helps to retain their engagement with the campus. 
With all the opportunity for connecting that it presents, technology in the 
  21st century is as important to campus life as running water and electricity. 
  We have come to expect the convenience of instant messaging, constant access 
  to information, and ease of connecting with other members of the campus community. 
Technology can be a great factor in retaining, attracting, and 
  ultimately serving the campus; yet, the capacity of technology 
  to connect and create relationships to support community might be the most important 
  advantage of this 21st century convenience. As Rosa Beth Moss Kanter concludes 
  in her study of the virtual world, Evolve: Succeeding in the Digital Culture 
  (Harvard Business School Press, 2001), “Community might seem a strange 
  word to use in conjunction with the ever-expanding virtual world. But one of 
  my most robust findings about e-culture is that it centers around strong communities, 
  online and off.” 
In her book, she outlines the hazards of the technology-saturated culture to 
  human relationships, and ultimately, to social institutions. Briefly, Kanter 
  cautions that the Internet can connect or isolate; it can enable community or 
  it can destroy a community. As campuses depend more and more on the convenience 
  of technology to connect students and faculty, and as technology facilitates 
  access to information and the exchange of ideas through the virtual world, the 
  caution to be wary of the ways technology can encourage isolation or be used 
  as a means to undermine community needs to be included in technology planning. 
Institutions of higher education are places that must help people navigate 
  the virtual world in a way that is productive in the real world. Campuses need 
  to provide state-of-the-art technology access while maintaining focus on establishing 
  a learning environment that supports students who will become the educators, 
  business and government leaders, researchers, and citizens of the world. Preparing 
  students for roles in our new world requires more than knowledge of their chosen 
  field and facility with technology; it requires a sense of community responsibility. 
  As higher education continues to keep pace with the advances of technology to 
  attract, serve, and retain students and faculty, may we not lose sight of a 
  key part of our noble mission of education: to provide learning communities 
  focused on preparing people for meaningful and productive lives for themselves 
  and their civic and world community. 
Rosemary E. Jeffries is president of Georgain Court University 
  (NJ). SunGard SCT (www.sungardsct.com) 
  is the publisher of President to President: Views of Technology in Higher Education 
  (2005) from which this article is excerpted, and is also corporate sponsor of 
  the New Presidents program. Marylouise Fennell, co-editor of 
  President to President, is coordinator of the New Presidents program, and senior 
  counsel to the Council of Independent Colleges (www.cic.edu). 
  Scott D. Miller, co-editor of President to President, is president of 
  Wesley College (DE), and chair of the program.