Can We Trust Students to Learn in Web 2.0?

A core debate about learning design arises from the fear that, if we allow learners too much freedom, they will not learn the right things. Web 2.0 exacerbates that fear because it is beyond the control of educators.

Loss of Control

The fear of loss of control has always led educators toward "one-step" teaching: "If we want students to learn properly, we have to tell them what is right" -- rather than the more optimistic "two-step" learning: "If we want students to learn, we have to let them discover for themselves within a learning structure we've created for them." The first approach allows us to define what we "cover" in teaching, the second relies on a belief that learners can be trusted to do the right thing, given a well-thought-out learning design.

Gather by the Woodstove

Our 10-month-old grandson was at our house last week to spend the day. We gave him toys designed for his age, many of which he likes and spends time with. But his real fascination is with our fireplace and the wood stove insert. He wants to touch the metal, the glass window, and the handles. He likes to see his reflection in the glass, to hear the boing sound of the handles when he pulls them and then releases them, and to explore the ash-catching metal lip.

We debate with ourselves: He could so easily get hurt if he slips and bumps his head on the hard edges but at the same time he is curious and engaged in discovery. We don't have as much control over the outcome of his fireplace exploration as we'd like, but we don't want to dampen his curiosity. Does he learn as much useful information by exploring the fireplace as by playing with shape-matching toys?

Or, a third possibility, the real lesson for him may be that he can learn from any exploration of the world: He's learning about learning. He's discovering that the world is fascinating. We guide him and keep him safe and so he is free to explore. Now he's heading for the CD player...

Are We Qualified and Ready to use Web 2.0?

What lessons can students learn by their exploration of Web 2.0? Is there a way to guide learning in Web 2.0 that enhances domain-specific learning? Can we trust students to learn the right things when we send them to the Web to do an assignment?

In the end, for us to trust our students in Web 2.0, we must first feel safe "out there" ourselves. But, I hear distrust messages from my colleagues. And, to be honest, not that many years ago, I feared typing in my credit card info to buy something on the Web. Even more recently, I was concerned about using new Web 2.0 sites. Wasn't it a waste of time? Would I become addicted? Who would I meet there?

With daily use, my trust has increased. I see more friends, family, and colleagues all the time on LinkedIn or Facebook. I have so many Web 2.0 accounts now I have to keep an "encrypted database" (scrawled so only I can read it) of all my logins and passwords.

But, still, for all of us academics, the question persists: Do we feel safe using Web 2.0 social sites? Do they seem non-academic or non-professional when we do?

To develop more awareness of Web 2.0, here's a great site to read: http://readwriteweb.com. Here, you will see what's happening in the "read-write" world (Web 2.0) regularly, get insight, and be directed to new sites to try.

Get familiar with these tools and develop trust. To make it easier to get to the ones you like, create a start page using Netvibes: http://www.netvibes.com. This is your personal portal to everything on the Web. Using Netvibes to launch to your Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, Flickr, YouTube, etc., sites, and connect to your e-mail, news, weather, feeds, and so on, you won't have to login to these separate sites each time.

Develop your own sense of safety on the Web. As you use sites out there, keep imagining how you can use the sites in your own teaching and learning. The water's always cold when you first get in, but, you know, it feels fine after you get used to it.

About the Author

Trent Batson is the president and CEO of AAEEBL (http://www.aaeebl.org), serving on behalf of the global electronic portfolio community. He was a tenured English professor before moving to information technology administration in the mid-1980s. Batson has been among the leaders in the field of educational technology for 25 years, the last 10 as an electronic portfolio expert and leader. He has worked at 7 universities but is now full-time president and CEO of AAEEBL. Batson’s ePortfolio: http://trentbatsoneportfolio.wordpress.com/ E-mail: [email protected]

Featured

  • MathGPT

    MathGPT AI Tutor Now Out of Beta

    Ed tech provider GotIt! Education has announced the general availability of MathGPT, an AI tutor and teaching assistant for foundational math support.

  • person signing a bill at a desk with a faint glow around the document. A tablet and laptop are subtly visible in the background, with soft colors and minimal digital elements

    California Governor Signs AI Content Safeguards into Law

    California Governor Gavin Newsom has officially signed off on a series of landmark artificial intelligence bills, signaling the state’s latest efforts to regulate the burgeoning technology, particularly in response to the misuse of sexually explicit deepfakes. The legislation is aimed at mitigating the risks posed by AI-generated content, as concerns grow over the technology's potential to manipulate images, videos, and voices in ways that could cause significant harm.

  • white desk with an open digital tablet showing AI-related icons like gears and neural networks

    Elon University and AAC&U Release Student Guide to AI

    A new publication from Elon University 's Imagining the Digital Future Center and the American Association of Colleges and Universities offers students key principles for navigating college in the age of artificial intelligence.

  • abstract technology icons connected by lines and dots

    Digital Layers and Human Ties: Navigating the CIO's Dilemma in Higher Education

    As technology permeates every aspect of life on campus, efficiency and convenience may come at the cost of human connection and professional identity.