Got Bandwidth?
        
        
        
        		
				Video-heavy distance learning programs can put a strain
on the campus network. Here's how three institutions are managing
bandwidth to ensure high-quality service for eLearning students.
		
 IT'S NO SECRET that distance learning programs
can wreak havoc on a campus network. Inherent in
the equation are problems of increased latency and
depleted bandwidth as an institution reaches out to
more students. The more students connecting
remotely, the harder it is to maintain the levels of service
required to keep those students satisfied.
IT'S NO SECRET that distance learning programs
can wreak havoc on a campus network. Inherent in
the equation are problems of increased latency and
depleted bandwidth as an institution reaches out to
more students. The more students connecting
remotely, the harder it is to maintain the levels of service
required to keep those students satisfied.
The College of Engineering at Villanova University  (PA) has tackled that problem head-on: Under
  the auspices of Sean O'Donnell, the college's director
  of distance education, technologists have
  embarked on a new program to minimize bandwidth
  and maximize throughput during distance education
  sessions, promising service levels that are ostensibly
  no different from the ones users can expect when
  they're connecting from a terminal on campus.  
"We believe the fact that people are connecting
  to the network remotely should have no bearing on
  the kind of experience they have once they're in,"
  says O'Donnell, who notes the network now supports
  upwards of a total of 150 megabytes per
  second for all users. "The process requires planning,
  but is perfectly doable once you know what
  you want."  
The Situation 
Through its online master's degree program, Villanova's College
  of Engineering serves about 400 students annually. In
  the past, the school was using RealVideo to deliver lectures
  over a bandwidth pipe that maxed out at a total of 66
  megabytes per second for all users. As bandwidth demands
  increased, however, this method became unreliable.
 In order to guarantee live presentations with absolute minimum
  delays, IT officials decided it was high time to optimize
  throughput across the board. To do this, they built a private
  network between servers and capture stations, and linked
  that directly to the campus backbone via fiber optic lines.
  O'Donnell says this ensured that eLearning traffic was not
  cluttered with normal network congestion and had priority.  
With this new setup in place, Villanova opted to run its
  asynchronous distance education system over the Mediasite
  system from Sonic Foundry. Every user who accesses
  the system now requires no more than 200 kilobytes of
  bandwidth to access the material-- 150 kilobytes for a
  video stream and 50 kilobytes for files of other types.  
Key Question No. 1: Video Quality 
When tasked to manage this bandwidth for the College of
  Engineering, O'Donnell and his colleagues say they asked
  themselves two key questions-- the first about video quality and the second about usage tendencies.  
The first question was simple: What quality is good
  enough for the material that users hope to access?
 Here, O'Donnell and his colleagues interviewed a series of
  students to get a sense of the quality of material they were
  hoping to download during their average distance education
  session. Turns out, most students were just looking for documents
  and basic video-- nothing exceptionally fancy.
 "If you're not really into high-motion video-- if you're more
  just relying on talking heads-- you don't need to waste
  money on bandwidth streaming high-definition stuff that
  shows you beads of sweat on everyone's forehead," he
  says. "The common mistake I see people making is that
  they over-qualify video for the type of material they're distributing
  and end up losing bandwidth in the process."  
O'Donnell adds that as compression algorithms and
  video servers have improved in recent years, higher education
  institutions have been able to get clearer video for less
  bandwidth-- and therefore less capital investment.
 "The quality we see now at 150 kilobytes per second, we
  used to see only at 400 kilobytes per second," he notes. "In
  terms of management, it lets you do more with less."  
Key Question No. 2: Usage 
The second question O'Donnell and his team members
  asked pertained to usage: How many simultaneous live
  viewers was the College of Engineering's distance education
  program going to have?  
According to O'Donnell, distance education particularly
  starts taxing network bandwidth when it tries to serve
  simultaneous viewers, like for a live event. But because
  most distance education users access events from an
  archive after the fact, servers only use the bandwidth that's
  available-- a process called "buffering."  
"For most people, the reason they are doing distance
  education is because they don't have time to attend an
  event live," he says, noting that the highest number of live
  viewers Villanova ever has seen at one time is about 70.  
In order to keep better tabs on available bandwidth,
  O'Donnell admits that he and his colleagues considered capping
  the number of simultaneous live viewers. In the end,
  however, the team opted not to go this route, out of concern
  for tinkering with the open nature of higher education.  
Getting Buy-In 
With the new Sonic Foundry system in place and bandwidth
  issues resolved, the next step for Villanova's College
  of Engineering was to educate students and faculty members
  to fully utilize the resource. Skeptical faculty members
  were a bit of a challenge: O'Donnell notes that despite the
  bandwidth and service improvements, some were reluctant
  to embrace a new system.  
"These people get so used to doing things the way
  they've done them for years, that it's hard for them to pick
  up new technologies right away," says O'Donnell. The solution?
  In the case of the College of Engineering, at least, it
  was regular meetings and a propaganda campaign
  designed to help familiarize users with the interface.  
"Communication definitely helps," O'Donnell quips.
  Indeed, sometimes the best way to manage anything is to
  just get users talking about it.  
A Different Approach 
While the folks at Villanova treat bandwidth for distance
    learning separately from bandwidth for the rest of the network,
    technologists at the University of Arizona and the
    University of Wisconsin System take a different
    approach: They don't differentiate bandwidth at all.    
The thinking at both of these institutions is the same: They
    have plenty of bandwidth to go around, so there's no need to
    monitor any one segment of the network more than the rest.
 At the University of Wisconsin system, Lorna Wong,
    interim director of learning technology development, says
    that a distance learning system from Desire2Learn provides
    more than 1 gigabyte of bandwidth to each of the system's
    institutions, and that at peak times, the institutions
    use no more than 10 percent of this available bandwidth.
 "Our network folks did their calculations and are confident
    we can meet just about any need that arises," she says. "From
    this perspective, it doesn't matter to us what bandwidth is
    going where, so long as we have enough to go around."    
The University of Arizona also uses Desire2Learn, and
    takes a similar approach. Christopher Pierce, an analyst in the
    University Information Technology Services department,
    notes: "All requests for bandwidth are provisioned as needed
    and managed together with [the whole] IT infrastructure." 
Despite keeping all bandwidth lumped together, technologists
      at both schools say they monitor bandwidth
      closely. At U of A, technicians recently have rolled up functions
      of various monitoring and management tools into one
      comprehensive system: EM7 from ScienceLogic. While
      UW's Wong declined to share specific tools used throughout
      the University of Wisconsin System, she notes that the
      existing tools monitor traffic by site, and some by IP ports.      
Wong adds that in many cases, students who experience
        bandwidth issues when they connect through the distance
        learning system actually are experiencing difficulties on the
        connection side, not with bandwidth on the Wisconsin side.
 "It could be any number of factors-- from an ISP to a firewall
          or a personal desktop," she explains. In those instances
          where UW technicians find out students are experiencing
          bandwidth problems at their connection point, Wong notes
          the technicians will work with instructors to send students
          CDs of lecture material or find other ways to accommodate
          them. "It's all about the students," she says. "We think we're
          in shape to give them all they need."