Students Who Comment More in MOOCs Have Higher Rates of Completion

A recent study found that students who comment more on massive open online courses (MOOCs) are more likely to complete the course than those who do not comment.

The study, published in the Journal of Computer Assisted Learning (JCAL), examined three areas of interest:

1. The number of comments made on MOOCs;
2. The demographics of groups who make fewer or more comments; and
3. The relationship between commenters and MOOC completion.

The researchers surveyed more than 25,000 learners in nine MOOCs between 2014 and 2015. In relation to the first question, the researchers found that the median number of comments made on MOOCs was only three. Many students made at least one comment, while only a small number made many. For example, the top 10 percent of all commenters made at least 16 comments.

The researchers also found significant differences between students who commented frequently and those who did not comment. Learners were more likely to comment frequently if they were older, worked part-time or not at all, were well educated and had taken an online course before. Likewise, students were less likely to comment if they were younger and worked or studied full-time. There was no significant difference regarding gender or country of origin.

Finally, the researchers concluded that students who commented more frequently were much more likely to complete a MOOC than those who never commented. The authors of the study pointed out that they didn’t wish to make a direct connection between those who didn’t comment and non-completion of MOOCs. Many do finish courses and are active in other ways, such as reading or liking posts. However, the more comments a student made in a MOOC, the more likely he or she was to complete the course.

Overall, MOOCs, while gaining in popularity, still have very low completion rates. In fact, only between 5 and 12 percent of students who enroll in a MOOC complete it, according to the JCAL study and previous studies.

To read the full JCAL study, visit this site. To learn more about the issue of MOOCs and commenters, visit the New Learning Times website. To learn more about MOOCs, visit this Educause site.

About the Author

Richard Chang is associate editor of THE Journal. He can be reached at [email protected].

Featured

  • open laptop in a college classroom with holographic AI icons like a brain and data charts rising from the screen

    4 Ways Universities Are Using Google AI Tools for Learning and Administration

    In a recent blog post, Google shared an array of education customer stories, showcasing ways institutions are using AI tools like Gemini and NotebookLM to transform both learning and administrative tasks.

  • illustration of a human head with a glowing neural network in the brain, connected to tech icons on a cool blue-gray background

    Meta Launches Stand-Alone AI App

    Meta Platforms has introduced a stand-alone artificial intelligence app built on its proprietary Llama 4 model, intensifying the competitive race in generative AI alongside OpenAI, Google, Anthropic, and xAI.

  • three main icons—a cloud, a user profile, and a padlock—connected by circuit lines on a blue abstract background

    Report: Identity Has Become a Critical Security Perimeter for Cloud Services

    A new threat landscape report points to new cloud vulnerabilities. According to the 2025 Global Threat Landscape Report from Fortinet, while misconfigured cloud storage buckets were once a prime vector for cybersecurity exploits, other cloud missteps are gaining focus.

  • Stylized illustration showing cybersecurity elements like shields, padlocks, and secure cloud icons on a neutral, minimalist digital background

    Microsoft Announces Security Advancements

    Microsoft has announced major security advancements across its product portfolio and practices. The work is part of its Secure Future Initiative (SFI), a multiyear cybersecurity transformation the company calls the largest engineering project in company history.