Social Communications May Boost STEM Success

closeup of hands on laptop with social media icons

A small study out of the University of Texas, El Paso recently explored whether social communications can help boost the outcomes of students in particularly challenging STEM courses. The study was reported by members of the teaching staff at the university during the annual conference of the American Society for Engineering Education. The bottom line: There was a link between heavy usage of social software and better grades.

The experiment took place in one of the most difficult courses for undergraduates, which has a large failure rate: Thermodynamics, a first-term junior course in the mechanical engineering department.

The university has a majority-Hispanic student body (81 percent), and the number of minority women in its engineering program is about 20 percent, most of them Hispanic.

Instructors and teaching assistants introduced students to the use of social media software — specifically Campuswire — as a means of communicating with fellow students and helping each other through the course. Campuswire offers a combination of discussion forum, anonymous reporting, multi-user chat rooms, an upvote system for scoring student responses and the ability of faculty to track student participation.

As described in a research paper about the project, during the first half of the semester, instructors saw little student activity on the site. Over that period, students took two "major" exams. After the second exam, the students were offered a "very minor grade incentive" — 2 extra points out of 100 — for using the software in a big way (though they were never told what that meant precisely), particularly to answer other students' questions. This small incentive was enough to goad some students into using Campuswire "very significantly." Over the latter half of the semester, the students were given two more major exams. Data was collected afterwards and analyzed to find out "how much and how effectively" the communication influenced student performance in the course.

When students answered questions, they could be up-voted by other students as well as the faculty. The idea was that students could use those up votes "to produce portfolio evidence they can be proud to show potential employers and graduate schools," the researchers wrote. "This can provide a quantifiable measure of student performance independent of grades."

Of 95 students enrolled in the class, 77 joined the software platform, but 18 of those never asked or answered questions. (The report noted that they might have viewed others' questions and answers; that wasn't tracked.) While the participating students were guided to ask questions related to the subject, other kinds of interactive posts were encouraged too, "to make the platform a friendly environment for communication to grow."

The study found that of the thermodynamics students who most heavily used the software (22 of them), 82 percent improved their grades over the course of the semester. Of the 55 students who used the software infrequently, just 44 percent improved their grades over the term.

"Our conclusion" the study reported, "is that the software helps students earn better grades if they use it in a significant way."

The paper is openly available through the American Society for Engineering Education website.

About the Author

Dian Schaffhauser is a former senior contributing editor for 1105 Media's education publications THE Journal, Campus Technology and Spaces4Learning.

Featured

  • two large brackets facing each other with various arrows, circles, and rectangles flowing between them

    1EdTech Partners with DXtera to Support Ed Tech Interoperability

    1EdTech Consortium and DXtera Institute have announced a partnership aimed at improving access to learning data in postsecondary and higher education.

  • Abstract geometric shapes including hexagons, circles, and triangles in blue, silver, and white

    Google Launches Its Most Advanced AI Model Yet

    Google has introduced Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental, a new artificial intelligence model designed to reason through problems before delivering answers, a shift that marks a major leap in AI capability, according to the company.

  •  laptop on a clean desk with digital padlock icon on the screen

    Study: Data Privacy a Top Concern as Orgs Scale Up AI Agents

    As organizations race to integrate AI agents into their cloud operations and business workflows, they face a crucial reality: while enthusiasm is high, major adoption barriers remain, according to a new Cloudera report. Chief among them is the challenge of safeguarding sensitive data.

  • stylized AI code and a neural network symbol, paired with glitching code and a red warning triangle

    New Anthropic AI Models Demonstrate Coding Prowess, Behavior Risks

    Anthropic has released Claude Opus 4 and Claude Sonnet 4, its most advanced artificial intelligence models to date, boasting a significant leap in autonomous coding capabilities while simultaneously revealing troubling tendencies toward self-preservation that include attempted blackmail.