Study: Many Faculty Still Don’t Know Where to Start with Textbook Affordability Issue

stack of open textbooks

The vast majority (82 percent) of college and university faculty are responsible for selecting course materials for at least one of their courses, yet 35 percent in a recent survey said they don't know where to start or what to do to reduce the cost of those materials. The survey, conducted by OnCampus Research, the research arm of the National Association of College Stores, polled 1,513 faculty at 21 higher education institutions to gauge their opinions on course materials, selection considerations, format preferences, affordability issues and more.

While wondering where to start was the No. 1 obstacle keeping faculty from participating in textbook affordability efforts, survey respondents also reported lack of time as well as bureaucracy/red tape as additional hurdles.

Still, according to the survey, one in five courses required no purchasing of course materials. One-third of faculty members said they used open education resources in the past year, and 74 percent said they have at least some awareness of OER.

Forty-nine percent of faculty reported they prefer the print format for course materials — a decrease of 11 percentage points from the previous year. Of those, 39 percent preferred a print textbook with added digital elements (such as interactive features and quizzes). Only 16 percent of faculty said they preferred an all-digital textbook.

The full report, "Faculty Watch: Attitudes & Behaviors Toward Course Materials, 2018-2019," is available for purchase from the OnCampus Research site.

About the Author

Rhea Kelly is editor in chief for Campus Technology, THE Journal, and Spaces4Learning. She can be reached at [email protected].

Featured

  • student reading a book with a brain, a protective hand, a computer monitor showing education icons, gears, and leaves

    4 Steps to Responsible AI Implementation

    Researchers at the University of Kansas Center for Innovation, Design & Digital Learning (CIDDL) have published a new framework for the responsible implementation of artificial intelligence at all levels of education.

  • three glowing stacks of tech-themed icons

    Research: LLMs Need a Translation Layer to Launch Complex Cyber Attacks

    While large language models have been touted for their potential in cybersecurity, they are still far from executing real-world cyber attacks — unless given help from a new kind of abstraction layer, according to researchers at Carnegie Mellon University and Anthropic.

  • Hand holding a stylus over a tablet with futuristic risk management icons

    Why Universities Are Ransomware's Easy Target: Lessons from the 23% Surge

    Academic environments face heightened risk because their collaboration-driven environments are inherently open, making them more susceptible to attack, while the high-value research data they hold makes them an especially attractive target. The question is not if this data will be targeted, but whether universities can defend it swiftly enough against increasingly AI-powered threats.

  • magnifying glass revealing the letters AI

    New Tool Tracks Unauthorized AI Usage Across Organizations

    DevOps platform provider JFrog is taking aim at a growing challenge for enterprises: users deploying AI tools without IT approval.