Can Distance-Learning Planners Share?

This fall I've been involved in planning meetings with half a dozen states and national organizations involving strategies for using distance learning. They have various goals, but in each case my message is the same. First, the thinking and planning must start from the student's perspective. Second, plan a project that solves a problem, not one that just brings more resources into the institutions.

In one of these states, the Western Cooperative for Educational Telecommunications (WCET) conducted an assessment of the educational needs of rural communities. The political and business leaders in these communities were concerned about economic development. They focused on the types of skills local people need to do the types of jobs that are being created in their communities—like training for jobs in health care, small business development, and basic technical literacy.

Of course, these are not the types of courses and programs that the leading distance-learning providers in the state are offering. These needs are also short- to medium-term in nature. To appropriately serve these rural communities, while recognizing that the specific needs will change within a few years, the only non-permanent solution is to use distance learning. However, even the distance-learning programs must be flexible. That means it would be more efficient to import courses from providers who have already developed them, providers that may or may not be located in the same state as the communities to be served.

Effectively serving these communities with distance learning also means that someone must take charge of assuring appropriate access to technology and connectivity. But this is just the first step; wh'ever this someone turns out to be must also help rural citizens understand how to use the higher-education system and the tools themselves. Learning to use the technological tools is the easy part. The system itself can be daunting. A large part of this someone's time is likely to be spent assisting local distance-learning students. This would entail helping them find the right course provider, finding the courses themselves, arranging library access, and assisting in finding all of the other local and electronic resources that the students need in order to be successful. None of this relates to creating courses, yet without this effort, distance learning offered to populations with little experience in higher education is not likely to be successful.

After I presented the results of our survey to the relevant state commission, there was a report on the state's virtual college project. The people reporting explained how critical it was that the project receive increased support. Their central recommendation was that their colleges needed to create more distance-learning offerings, as a couple dozen students were already earning their degrees via distance learning originating in a neighboring state.

Ironically, this came right after I had told the commission members about a cooperative, not competitive, way that neighboring states could react to one another. My example was West Virginia and Kentucky. The state of West Virginia is contracting with Kentucky for distance-learning programs the latter has already developed. The citizens in West Virginia need these programs, and their state decision-makers have decided it is much cheaper for them to purchase the programs than to create them. It also allows West Virginia to serve some of its short-term needs without developing new programs.

I guess my remarks were hard to hear. It seems that institution-centered ways of thinking die hard.

About the Author

Sally Johnstone is founding director of the Western Cooperative for Educational Telecommunications (WCET) and serves on advisory groups for state, national, and international organizations to help plan and evaluate eLearning projects.

Featured

  • abstract illustration of a glowing AI-themed bar graph on a dark digital background with circuit patterns

    Stanford 2025 AI Index Reveals Surge in Adoption, Investment, and Global Impact as Trust and Regulation Lag Behind

    Stanford University's Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HAI) has released its AI Index Report 2025, measuring AI's diverse impacts over the past year.

  • modern college building with circuit and brain motifs

    Anthropic Launches Claude for Education

    Anthropic has announced a version of its Claude AI assistant tailored for higher education institutions. Claude for Education "gives academic institutions secure, reliable AI access for their entire community," the company said, to enable colleges and universities to develop and implement AI-enabled approaches across teaching, learning, and administration.

  • lightbulb

    Call for Speakers Now Open for Tech Tactics in Education: Overcoming Roadblocks to Innovation

    The annual virtual conference from the producers of Campus Technology and THE Journal will return on September 25, 2025, with a focus on emerging trends in cybersecurity, data privacy, AI implementation, IT leadership, building resilience, and more.

  • From Fire TV to Signage Stick: University of Utah's Digital Signage Evolution

    Jake Sorensen, who oversees sponsorship and advertising and Student Media in Auxiliary Business Development at the University of Utah, has navigated the digital signage landscape for nearly 15 years. He was managing hundreds of devices on campus that were incompatible with digital signage requirements and needed a solution that was reliable and lowered labor costs. The Amazon Signage Stick, specifically engineered for digital signage applications, gave him the stability and design functionality the University of Utah needed, along with the assurance of long-term support.