Microsoft Appeals $1.3 Billion European Commission Penalty

Microsoft Friday appealed a $1.3 billion (899 million euro) penalty for noncompliance with an earlier European Commission (EC) antitrust ruling against the company. The EC had slapped the penalty on Microsoft in February of this year for failing to meet the terms of a March 2004 EC antitrust ruling. The $1.3 billion penalty comes on top of the ECs' existing $1.5 billion in fines against the company.

In the March 2004 ruling, Microsoft was found liable for charging its server business competitors excessive royalties for the protocols needed to interoperate with Windows PCs. Companies making the complaint included Sun Microsystems and Novell, among others.

Microsoft released protocol information  October 22, 2007, positioning it to be in compliance with the March 2004 decision. However, the $1.3 billion penalty is a charge for the nearly three-year span between those dates in which Microsoft reaped "the benefits of its illegal refusal to disclose interoperability information," according to an EC FAQ.

The EC announcement of the $1.3 billion penalty described it as further confined to a period of noncompliance "starting on 21 June 2006 and ending on 21 October 2007."

The record $1.3 billion penalty marked the first time in 50 years that a company had failed to comply with a European Union antitrust decision, according to European Competition Commissioner Neelie Kroes, in a February statement, who hoped at the time that the decision would help close "a dark chapter in Microsoft's record of non-compliance...."

Microsoft had issued its "interoperability principles" a week before the $1.3 billion penalty was announced, where Microsoft promised to provide access to some of its application protocol interfaces and documentation needed for competitors to develop interoperable products. The timing made it seem like Microsoft was opening up its protocols of its own accord as part of strategy by Microsoft's Chief Software Architect Ray Ozzie. However, the timing may have also been a response to the EC's penalties, as well as an attempt to cultivate the good will needed for Microsoft to shepherd its Office Open XML document format as an international standard. OOXML was approved as standard by the ISO/IEC body in April.

Microsoft has two legal programs to achieve compliance with the EC's antitrust complaints. The company promised a licensing program associated with its work group server protocols and also stated it would comply with the EC by separating Windows Media Player from the Windows XP operating system.

Microsoft's licensing program was deemed acceptable by the EC  October 22, 2007, in which Microsoft provides interoperability information for 10,000 euros (a flat fee), as well as an option for worldwide patent licensing at a royalty rate that taps 0.4 percent of the licensees' product revenues.

About the Author

Kurt Mackie is online news editor, Enterprise Group, at 1105 Media Inc.

Featured

  • interconnected cloud icons with glowing lines on a gradient blue backdrop

    Report: Cloud Certifications Bring Biggest Salary Payoff

    It pays to be conversant in cloud, according to a new study from Skillsoft The company's annual IT skills and salary survey report found that the top three certifications resulting in the highest payoffs salarywise are for skills in the cloud, specifically related to Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google Cloud, and Nutanix.

  • AI-inspired background pattern with geometric shapes and fine lines in muted blue and gray on a dark background

    IBM Releases Granite 3.0 Family of Advanced AI Models

    IBM has introduced its most advanced family of AI models to date, Granite 3.0, at its annual TechXchange event. The new models were developed to provide a combination of performance, flexibility, and autonomy that outperforms or matches similarly sized models from leading providers on a range of benchmarks.

  • landscape photo with an AI rubber stamp on top

    California AI Watermarking Bill Garners OpenAI Support

    ChatGPT creator OpenAI is backing a California bill that would require tech companies to label AI-generated content in the form of a digital "watermark." The proposed legislation, known as the "California Digital Content Provenance Standards" (AB 3211), aims to ensure transparency in digital media by identifying content created through artificial intelligence. This requirement would apply to a broad range of AI-generated material, from harmless memes to deepfakes that could be used to spread misinformation about political candidates.

  • happy woman sitting in front of computer

    Delightful Progress: Kuali's Legacy of Community and Leadership

    CEO Joel Dehlin updates us on Kuali today, and how it has thrived as a software company that succeeds in the tech marketplace while maintaining the community values envisioned in higher education years ago.