1 in 4 Campuses Have Never Tested Crisis Management Plan

Nearly a quarter of colleges and universities have never tested their campus crisis response plan, and, of those that have, only a third said they found the plan effective in dealing with a crisis. Those are some of the results of a proprietary survey designed to gauge the effectiveness of crisis response on college and university campuses. Academic Impressions, which holds events for higher education, did the survey through e-mail in January 2010 and received responses from administrators in admissions, student affairs, business/planning, human resources, and campus leadership at institutions across the country.

According to the results, 54 percent of institutions have tested their crisis response plan in the last year; 23 percent have never tested their plans. The largest obstacles to executing tests, according to the research, were timing (67 percent), participation (43 percent), budget (40 percent), and securing campus-wide buy-in (36 percent).

The survey also found that 51 percent of schools have had a crisis on their campus in the last two years; and a third of respondents have low or no confidence in their institution's ability to execute the plan in the event of an emergency. Only a fifth of respondents said their campuses had annual meetings to brief the relevant people on the crisis response plan.

"In the wake of several high-profile campus crises, the importance of regular evaluation and testing of crisis management plans is critical to ensuring a coordinated, multi-departmental campus response," said Marla Whipple, conference director at Academic Impressions. "Institutions should implement and adhere to foundational testing protocols to increase preparedness for environmental, facility, and human-caused incidents."

The company offered this advice for developing a crisis response plan:

1. Set a schedule for testing, reviewing, and revising the plan. Amend plans based on what participants learn from practice tests and from evaluating successes and failures of other schools' emergency management protocol.

2. Develop a graduated set of achievable tests, starting with basic drills and increasing the complexity over time. The company said that reaching the stage where a full-scale crisis simulation can take place could take years.

3. Mix up the drills and exercises conducted annually, testing different functions, scenarios, and activities. This approach gives stakeholders practice in responding to the variety of crisis situations that can affect a campus, including environmental, facility, and human-caused incidents.

About the Author

Dian Schaffhauser is a former senior contributing editor for 1105 Media's education publications THE Journal, Campus Technology and Spaces4Learning.

Featured

  • digital lock with circuit patterns

    IBM Announces New AI-Powered Cybersecurity Tools

    IBM has announced an expanded portfolio of AI-powered cybersecurity products, positioning the company to compete more aggressively in a rapidly evolving market where enterprises are increasingly turning to artificial intelligence to defend against automated cyber threats.

  • large group of college students sitting on an academic quad

    Student Readiness: Learning to Learn

    Melissa Loble, Instructure's chief academic officer, recommends a focus on 'readiness' as a broader concept as we try to understand how to build meaningful education experiences that can form a bridge from the university to the workplace. Here, we ask Loble what readiness is and how to offer students the ability to 'learn to learn'.

  • Educational path and career development growth with neon icons for study, idea, graduation, and success

    How to Embrace Lifelong Learning as a Non-negotiable for Career Growth

    In a world shaped by rapid technological change and shifting economic forces, staying curious and committed to learning is the most powerful way to stay prepared.

  • glowing brain above stacked coins

    The Higher Ed Playbook for AI Affordability

    Fulfilling the promise of AI in higher education does not require massive budgets or radical reinvention. By leveraging existing infrastructure, embracing edge and localized AI, collaborating across institutions, and embedding AI thoughtfully across the enterprise, universities can move from experimentation to impact.