U Michigan Students Benefit from Course Data

Students at the University of Michigan now have access to an online tool intended to help them make better decisions about the courses they're considering. The Academic Reporting Toolkit (ART) 2.0 is actually a data visualization program that crunches historic data from 9,273 courses to inform users about the paths followed by students who have taken particular classes. It's intended to be used not only by students but also by advisors, faculty and administrators.

The program is a second generation of a previous tool that has been in use for 12 years, primarily by faculty to examine information such as mean grade and grade distributions, enrollment in other classes, grade correlations among classes and the effect of standardized test scores on course performance. The new version uses the same data but displays it in an interface students will be able to follow.

Previously, to get this type of course information required students to talk to others or hit online sites that rate courses and professors.

The development work was undertaken by the Digital Innovation Greenhouse within the Office of Digital Education & Innovation. DIG, as it's known, works with campus groups to scale up promising software. Other DIG projects include ECoach, to send personalized messages to STEM students in large introductory courses; GradeCraft, a gamified learning management system; and Student Explorer, an early warning system for advisors.

"What we're trying to do is increase the visibility of useful data that already exists," said ART 2.0 creator August "Gus" Evrard, a professor of physics, in a university press release. "Accuracy is important and our aim is to provide data you can understand and trust." The first-generation version of ART was designed by an IT advisory committee in the College of Literature, Science and the Arts, and later expanded to include the university's engineering department. That committee was led by Evrard. The program initially was used by faculty who needed to advise students on the best route to graduation.

"It provides everyone on campus with an array of new information about courses — who takes them, when, what they go on to major in, and what other courses these students take before and after this," added DIG principal investigator, Timothy McKay, a professor of physics. "It's our hope that students will use this information to choose courses which are right for them — to personalize their own education."

Evrard noted that the program will continue evolving as DIG uncovers additional useful ways to share data with the campus community.

About the Author

Dian Schaffhauser is a former senior contributing editor for 1105 Media's education publications THE Journal, Campus Technology and Spaces4Learning.

Featured

  • Abstract neural network 3D illustration

    Intel® AI EmpowerED: The AI-Ready Campus, Delivered

    Artificial intelligence is transforming higher education, prompting institutions to rethink how they manage infrastructure, security, governance, and workforce readiness. Successful adoption requires a strategic, institution-wide approach that aligns AI initiatives with educational goals, faculty enablement, and scalable operational frameworks.

  • Businessman using laptop analyzing data and growth graph chart

    AI Budgets in Education Show No Sign of Decline

    The vast majority of education organizations (98%) expect their AI infrastructure budgets to either increase or hold steady over the next year, according to a recent report from cloud storage provider Wasabi.

  • Jason Palm

    AI, Identity, and Speed: Cybersecurity Priorities for Higher Ed

    Fortinet Security Operations Specialist Jason Palm explains how AI is raising new security challenges for higher education, requiring stronger governance, identity protection, threat detection, automation, and incident readiness.

  • Silhouettes of human faces in cyberspace

    Defending Against Data Breaches in the Age of Deepfakes

    As social-engineering attacks surpass ransomware as the top cyber risk, institutions must reevaluate their cybersecurity practices.