Unizin Partners with edX, Cengage

Nonprofit consortium Unizin is expanding its suite of education technologies and services through two new partnerships with edX and Cengage.

The alliance with edX focuses on advancing ed tech standards and open access to data for users of the Open edX learning platform, according to a news release. Unizin will "operate and invest in" Open edX, hosting the software for the consortium's member universities. A number of universities have committed to implementing Open edX through Unizin's hosted offering, including Ohio State University, Indiana University and the University of Michigan.  

"By adopting Open edX and working closely with the other members of the community to accelerate the development of open standards and educational services, the 25 institutions that comprise Unizin will play an integral part in advancing and supporting all forms of digital education," commented Anant Agarwal, edX CEO and MIT professor, in a statement. "This partnership marks an exciting step in furthering our joint missions of increasing access to high-quality education for all learners, everywhere."

Unizin's agreement with Cengage establishes the company as the "exclusive services partner for expert course design, production services and curriculum analysis to improve student retention and learner success" for consortium members. Unizin members can tap Cengage's Learning Solutions team to help "measure, review and tailor content, technology and design services," according to a news announcement. The partnership builds on an existing deal that provided more affordable course materials to students across all Unizin member institutions.

"Our expanded agreement with Unizin gives member institutions access to services that improve the learning experience at a more affordable price, delivering value and ultimately promoting confident and successful learners," said Todd Markson, senior vice president of strategy and operations for Cengage.

"Learner success is the end goal in everything we do," said Robin Littleworth, chief operating officer at Unizin. "The services offered by Cengage are an opportunity for our Members to further inform course design and development efforts aimed at improving the learner experience and student achievement."

About the Author

Rhea Kelly is editor in chief for Campus Technology, THE Journal, and Spaces4Learning. She can be reached at [email protected].

Featured

  • Three cubes of noticeably increasing sizes are arranged in a straight row on a subtle abstract background

    A Sense of Scale

    Gardner Campbell explores the notion of scale in education and shares some of his own experience "playing with scale" — scaling up and/or scaling down — in an English course at VCU.

  • AI-inspired background pattern with geometric shapes and fine lines in muted blue and gray on a dark background

    IBM Releases Granite 3.0 Family of Advanced AI Models

    IBM has introduced its most advanced family of AI models to date, Granite 3.0, at its annual TechXchange event. The new models were developed to provide a combination of performance, flexibility, and autonomy that outperforms or matches similarly sized models from leading providers on a range of benchmarks.

  • minimalist bookcase filled with textbooks featuring vibrant, solid-colored spines with no text, and a prominent number "25" displayed on one of the shelves

    OpenStax Celebrates 25th Anniversary

    OpenStax is celebrating its 25th anniversary as 2024 comes to a close. The open educational resources initiative from Rice University has served almost 37 million students in 153 countries and saved students nearly $3 billion in course material costs since its launch in 1999.

  • a professional worker in business casual attire interacting with a large screen displaying a generative AI interface in a modern office

    Study: Generative AI Could Inhibit Critical Thinking

    A new study on how knowledge workers engage in critical thinking found that workers with higher confidence in generative AI technology tend to employ less critical thinking to AI-generated outputs than workers with higher confidence in personal skills.