Survey: Majority of Faculty Acknowledge that Textbook Affordability Is an Issue on Their Campus

stack of textbooks with piggy bank on top

In a recent survey, 90 percent of faculty reported that textbook affordability is a concern for their institution. Yet just 40 percent said their school has a program focused on reducing textbook costs. That's according to the second annual FlatWorld Textbook Affordability Study, in which the learning materials publisher polled 786 faculty members at two- and four-year institutions across the country about their attitudes toward textbook costs.  

According to the survey, about two-thirds of faculty think textbook prices have stayed the same or increased compared to previous semesters. When asked about the biggest drivers of high textbook prices, faculty cited unnecessary new editions, bundled courseware, bookstore price gouging, one-time-use digital codes, and monopoly control of the textbook publishing industry, among other factors. Respondents estimated that students at their school spent $489 last semester on course materials.

Other findings include:

  • Faculty are uncomfortable with most publisher incentives for textbook adoption. In particular, the majority of faculty deemed the following practices either "generally unacceptable" or "totally unacceptable": publishers funding department grants in exchange for textbook adoption; publishers funding student programs in exchange for textbook adoption; and publishers hosting instructors at a "vacation location" to provide feedback on a textbook.
  • Sixty-four percent of respondents viewed inclusive access programs — in which publishers provide a textbook discount in exchange for a commitment from the school to ensure students automatically purchase course materials as part of tuition costs — as either "generally unacceptable" or "totally unacceptable."
  • For many of the publisher incentives that faculty deemed unacceptable, respondents nevertheless reported that the practices do occur at their institutions. For example, 17 percent of respondents said that publishers provide their university or department a discount in exchange for an inclusive access program.
  • Across the board, textbook adoption incentives are disproportionately used at larger institutions (those with an enrollment of more than 20,000 students).

The full report is available on the FlatWorld site.

About the Author

Rhea Kelly is editor in chief for Campus Technology, THE Journal, and Spaces4Learning. She can be reached at [email protected].

Featured

  • Three cubes of noticeably increasing sizes are arranged in a straight row on a subtle abstract background

    A Sense of Scale

    Gardner Campbell explores the notion of scale in education and shares some of his own experience "playing with scale" — scaling up and/or scaling down — in an English course at VCU.

  • AI-inspired background pattern with geometric shapes and fine lines in muted blue and gray on a dark background

    IBM Releases Granite 3.0 Family of Advanced AI Models

    IBM has introduced its most advanced family of AI models to date, Granite 3.0, at its annual TechXchange event. The new models were developed to provide a combination of performance, flexibility, and autonomy that outperforms or matches similarly sized models from leading providers on a range of benchmarks.

  • minimalist bookcase filled with textbooks featuring vibrant, solid-colored spines with no text, and a prominent number "25" displayed on one of the shelves

    OpenStax Celebrates 25th Anniversary

    OpenStax is celebrating its 25th anniversary as 2024 comes to a close. The open educational resources initiative from Rice University has served almost 37 million students in 153 countries and saved students nearly $3 billion in course material costs since its launch in 1999.

  • a professional worker in business casual attire interacting with a large screen displaying a generative AI interface in a modern office

    Study: Generative AI Could Inhibit Critical Thinking

    A new study on how knowledge workers engage in critical thinking found that workers with higher confidence in generative AI technology tend to employ less critical thinking to AI-generated outputs than workers with higher confidence in personal skills.