Top 3 Ways Institutions Can Improve Student Support

college students studying

The COVID-19 pandemic has both highlighted the importance of student support services in higher education and revealed gaps in how institutions are meeting the needs of at-risk students, according to a recent report from Blackboard. In the survey of more than 2,100 postsecondary students across the United States, conducted in partnership with Qualtrics, nearly two-thirds of respondents (65 percent) said they believe support services are more important now than pre-pandemic. And while more than half of students (52 percent) said they were satisfied with the level of support their institutions have provided during COVID-19, 21 percent were dissatisfied and 26 percent reported that support at their school worsened during the pandemic.

In particular, at-risk student populations were far more likely to report a lack of support from their institutions. For example, just 32 percent of at-risk students felt confident that they could find academic or tutoring support, compared to 60 percent of non-at-risk students. Twenty-five percent of at-risk students were confident they could find advising support (compared to 52 percent of non-at-risk students), and 39 percent of at-risk students felt confident finding financial aid support (compared to 56 percent of those not at-risk).  

"Real gaps for at-risk and minority students emerged in the survey results," noted Richa Batra, vice president of student success at Blackboard, in a statement. "At-risk student populations were less likely to have received support in the past, less likely to know where to find it, and found it more difficult to receive it. It's a triple red flag for institutions."

When students were asked about how institutions can improve their support services, three top priorities emerged:

  • Availability 24 hours a day, 365 days a year (cited by 43 percent of respondents);
  • Speed of response (41 percent); and
  • Ease of access (38 percent).

The report also detailed how support preferences varied across different student populations. For example:

  • At-risk students were more likely to prefer automated services such as chatbots (cited by 34 percent of at-risk students compared to 19 percent of non-at-risk students) and self-service phone menus (34 percent compared to 25 percent).
  • Non-traditional students were more likely to prefer text messages than traditional students (48 percent compared to 41 percent, respectively).
  • Online students were more likely to cite technical support as a key priority.

"Students, especially at-risk students, can't take advantage of support if they can't find it or if it's not available when they are," commented Batra. "By identifying at-risk students and proactively engaging them with a personalized approach that meets their unique needs, institutions can truly make a difference by keeping students on path toward success."

The report is freely available on the Blackboard site.

About the Author

Rhea Kelly is editor in chief for Campus Technology, THE Journal, and Spaces4Learning. She can be reached at [email protected].

Featured

  • student reading a book with a brain, a protective hand, a computer monitor showing education icons, gears, and leaves

    4 Steps to Responsible AI Implementation

    Researchers at the University of Kansas Center for Innovation, Design & Digital Learning (CIDDL) have published a new framework for the responsible implementation of artificial intelligence at all levels of education.

  • three glowing stacks of tech-themed icons

    Research: LLMs Need a Translation Layer to Launch Complex Cyber Attacks

    While large language models have been touted for their potential in cybersecurity, they are still far from executing real-world cyber attacks — unless given help from a new kind of abstraction layer, according to researchers at Carnegie Mellon University and Anthropic.

  • Hand holding a stylus over a tablet with futuristic risk management icons

    Why Universities Are Ransomware's Easy Target: Lessons from the 23% Surge

    Academic environments face heightened risk because their collaboration-driven environments are inherently open, making them more susceptible to attack, while the high-value research data they hold makes them an especially attractive target. The question is not if this data will be targeted, but whether universities can defend it swiftly enough against increasingly AI-powered threats.

  • magnifying glass revealing the letters AI

    New Tool Tracks Unauthorized AI Usage Across Organizations

    DevOps platform provider JFrog is taking aim at a growing challenge for enterprises: users deploying AI tools without IT approval.