2007 Campus Technology Innovators Entry Form
NOMINATION SUBMITTED BY
Name:
Title:
Institution:
E-Mail:
Phone:
NOMINEE INFORMATION
Project Lead Name:
Department:
Other Primary Team Contributors (if applicable):
Name of Project/Initiative:
URL of Project (if applicable):
Vendor Partners Involved (please list companies and contact information):
PROJECT DETAILS
The Challenge or Inspiration
Key Beneficiaries Who on campus or elsewhere benefits from the technology implementation? (e.g., faculty, entering freshman class, administrators) In what way? [Please answer in 75 words or less]:
Results What has been or will be the impact of the technology? Include direct impact and trickle-down impact, such as greater student yield/retention, competitive edge for institution, etc. [Please answer in 75 words or less]:
Suprises and 'Ah Hah!' Moments What were the surprises? What were the unforeseen stumbling blocks? Please share the obstacles or unintended consequences those tackling similar implementations might not anticipate. Include anecdotal information, proudest moments, etc. [Please answer in 75 words or less]:
TECHNOLOGY CHOICES
Short List List top five products considered for the project.
Additional Technologies List three to five final product choices/vendors.
Reasons for Technology Choices Why did you choose the products you did? Include differentiating factors (reasons why you chose one product over another), primary and secondary reasons, and include any campus models or mentors that helped you make the decision. Did this product replace any other technology/product? If so, what? (Include “rip and replace” and/or “phase-in” information) [Please answer in 100 words or less]:
Next Steps What are your next steps (if applicable)? Now that your initial implementation is successful, what will you do next? Why? [Please answer in 75 words or less]:
Advice What advice would you give to others facing similar challenges to those you originally identified, or to those looking at the same type of technology implementation? [Please answer in 75 words or less]:
Additional Information Please include any additional supporting information, including additional supporting URLs. [Please answer in 75 words or less]:
E-Mail this page
Printable Format
A new Cloudera survey of 1,500 enterprise technology leaders found widespread AI-driven architecture changes, with governance problems, rising infrastructure costs, and workload placement pushing organizations toward more hybrid approaches.
Gartner forecasts worldwide AI spending will reach $2.67 trillion in 2026, up 49.5% from 2025, with AI infrastructure accounting for nearly $1.5 trillion, or about 56% of the total. For every dollar Gartner expects to be spent on generative AI models, more than $52 will be spent on infrastructure.
OpenAI has announced it is preparing to retire Custom GPTs and move the specialized workflows built around them to a new plugin architecture spanning ChatGPT and its Codex coding agent.
Threat researchers at cloud security firm Sysdig have disclosed what they describe as the first documented ransomware operation carried out end-to-end by an autonomous AI agent, with no human typing commands or directing individual steps once the attack was underway.
More
More Portals
More Webcasts
More White Papers