Global Education Needs More Institutions Participating in Open Doors Research

With better international education data collection and reporting, the industry will have a more accurate and on-demand dataset that can bolster advocacy efforts and help organizations track trends and address emerging needs.

Earlier this week, the Institute of International Education (IIE) released its annual Open Doors report, an extensive survey of international exchange activity in the United States. But we need more colleges and universities to participate. The more institutions that submit their data for the annual survey, the better the data we have to muster collective influence with key stakeholders.

Sponsored by the U.S. Department of State, the Open Doors report evaluates the number of international students and scholars studying at U.S. higher education institutions and the number of American college and university students studying abroad for academic credit.

And, while the report may be billed as "comprehensive," it isn't. Higher education institutions aren't required to submit their information. Many do, of course — some 1,000 or so, but hundreds more institutions have data to submit.

The reasons why so many institutions don't take part are varied, but a longstanding complaint is that the effort required to collect the data is daunting, sometimes taking weeks working across disparate campus units to pull everything together.

But today, perhaps more than ever, the industry needs every institution to step up. As international offices emerge from the COVID-19 pandemic, focused on reinvigorating their initiatives, the right data can make all the difference — bolstering their arguments to grow and expand and demonstrating their vital importance in the economy. Here's why it matters.

Overworked, Scattered Data

As a national snapshot of student mobility, Open Doors is a critical dataset. But each year, necessary changes and refinement make it more complex for institutions to collect and report the data in the required format. Schools must submit information in the same way; otherwise, the data will be unreliable.

International educators have only recently embraced the power of institutional data and analytics. It wasn't that long ago when students weren't even required to apply for an education abroad program formally, and they could theoretically study abroad without notifying anybody in the international office.

Even still, many institutions have done all they could to participate in Open Doors over the decades. We remember past colleagues closing their doors for weeks to focus on collecting and triangulating the data in the right way.

International education offices are especially strapped for time and resources. One and two-person teams are common, and these professionals are tasked with many responsibilities — from student advising and enrollment management to ensuring immigration compliance and effective program implementation. As a result, taking a month each year to gather the right data points across campus units for a national report tends to take a backseat.

But, spending that time collecting the data also can pay off for the industry. A better, more representative Open Doors report could mean more assistance and support for international higher education including those small, overworked offices.

Why Better Reporting Matters

When hundreds or thousands of institutions are missing from the Open Doors analysis, our industry misses out on opportunities to influence policymakers and lawmakers for support and funding.

A more robust report with data from a broader range of institutions will make it easier for organizations like IIE and NAFSA to advocate for international education. In addition, it will provide a complete picture of the billions of dollars that international education pumps into the economy at national and state levels, convincing lawmakers that it's an effort worth their time and attention.

With the right data, international educators will be better positioned to emphasize the importance of international education within their institutions and show how it can enhance and extend an institution's overall mission, values, and priorities.

It's important to note that Open Doors' data is a broad brush. These are not institutional snapshots or benchmarking opportunities for institutions to compare their programs with peer institutions elsewhere. Even still, institutions use the Open Doors data to understand the state of programming and enrollments and where they might improve.

Moreover, a more comprehensive Open Doors report means organizations that support international mobility have better information to track trends and discover emerging markets, so they can shift to address the needs and demands.

Thankfully, global engagement and enrollment management platforms have made it easier for institutions to respond to the annual Open Doors survey without manual data collection. As a result, international educators have options to complete the process seamlessly and with higher data veracity.

Once more institutions adopt ways to automate the international education data collection and reporting, the industry will have a more accurate and on-demand dataset that can bolster advocacy efforts. When combined with other international initiatives, this enables the industry to be more strategic, and our collective efforts to recruit, for example, grow immeasurably to meet the Open Doors' objective: providing insights to help drive the next generation of international higher education.

About the Authors

Anthony C. Ogden, Ph.D., is founder and managing director of Gateway International Group.

Anthony Rotoli is CEO of Terra Dotta.

Featured

  • abstract illustration of a glowing AI-themed bar graph on a dark digital background with circuit patterns

    Stanford 2025 AI Index Reveals Surge in Adoption, Investment, and Global Impact as Trust and Regulation Lag Behind

    Stanford University's Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HAI) has released its AI Index Report 2025, measuring AI's diverse impacts over the past year.

  • modern college building with circuit and brain motifs

    Anthropic Launches Claude for Education

    Anthropic has announced a version of its Claude AI assistant tailored for higher education institutions. Claude for Education "gives academic institutions secure, reliable AI access for their entire community," the company said, to enable colleges and universities to develop and implement AI-enabled approaches across teaching, learning, and administration.

  • lightbulb

    Call for Speakers Now Open for Tech Tactics in Education: Overcoming Roadblocks to Innovation

    The annual virtual conference from the producers of Campus Technology and THE Journal will return on September 25, 2025, with a focus on emerging trends in cybersecurity, data privacy, AI implementation, IT leadership, building resilience, and more.

  • From Fire TV to Signage Stick: University of Utah's Digital Signage Evolution

    Jake Sorensen, who oversees sponsorship and advertising and Student Media in Auxiliary Business Development at the University of Utah, has navigated the digital signage landscape for nearly 15 years. He was managing hundreds of devices on campus that were incompatible with digital signage requirements and needed a solution that was reliable and lowered labor costs. The Amazon Signage Stick, specifically engineered for digital signage applications, gave him the stability and design functionality the University of Utah needed, along with the assurance of long-term support.