What Should Be Capturing Faculty Attention?

Emerging issues in distance learning and the use of electronic technologies demand faculty attention. But is anyone listening? My colleagues and I compiled a list of these important issues for faculty in the coming years. Are these on the “to do” list at your institution?

  1. Information technology literacy. Librarians have long been the vanguard of those requiring undergraduate students to demonstrate information technology literacy, but no one has pushed this agenda for faculty. Very few well-developed and supported training opportunities exist for faculty to learn exemplary uses of electronic databases and library resources. Even fewer opportunities are available to faculty to learn how to obtain and use electronic learning objects. In fact, training in new tools has never been part of the traditional faculty culture at colleges and universities. Until today’s students become the higher education faculty, faculty members need their own learning opportunities to incorporate the new tools effectively into their teaching.
  2. Retaining IT staff. Casey Green’s 2000 Campus Computing Survey indicates that a critical issue on campuses is retaining information technology staff. It is easy to speculate as to why campuses have difficulty retaining staff, given the salaries most colleges and universities can afford to pay vis-à-vis higher paying industry jobs and the increasing demands to support more and more applications. However, coming up with solutions is not so easy, and the implications of this problem are a concern to faculty. Most faculty members do not want to spend time learning to diagnose computer or network problems—they expect support. When a campus has to cut back on IT support, the faculty members are likely to suffer.
  3. Higher expectations from students. According to a National Public Radio report in March of this year, 75 percent of kids between the ages of 12 and 18 in the United States went online in January 2001. This “Net generation” has some expectations for service that differ from current campus practices. A single faculty member cannot be available to respond to e-mailed questions 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Yet most faculty members want to be responsive to their students. This mismatch of expectations and capabilities may require some new management skills for faculty.
  4. Cooperative consortia. The most critical issue looming for faculty is learning to work together across campuses and states in ways for which there are no precedents. The proliferation of state and multi-state consortia demands that each college and university accept the teaching of one another. Students expect to be able to choose a course from any institution in the consortium and have it count toward their degree. They don't care about inter-institutional rivalry or the minute differences between the cognitive psychology class taught at Institution A and that of Institution B. Few strategies exist for smoothing inter-institutional cooperation among faculty. However, the energy of a few creative faculty members would surely result in good solutions—such as having multi-campus teams create the electronic courses.
  5. Using commercial courseware. Finally, with more consortia and commercially developed courses, faculty members need to learn how to use an imported electronic course for the students on their campus. Instead of being a lecturer, the professor becomes the mentor helping a student shape her understanding of the vast array of information on the topic—the electronic equivalent of the scholar and student sitting on opposite ends of the proverbial log.

About the Author

Sally Johnstone is founding director of the Western Cooperative for Educational Telecommunications (WCET) and serves on advisory groups for state, national, and international organizations to help plan and evaluate eLearning projects.

Featured

  • landscape photo with an AI rubber stamp on top

    California AI Watermarking Bill Garners OpenAI Support

    ChatGPT creator OpenAI is backing a California bill that would require tech companies to label AI-generated content in the form of a digital "watermark." The proposed legislation, known as the "California Digital Content Provenance Standards" (AB 3211), aims to ensure transparency in digital media by identifying content created through artificial intelligence. This requirement would apply to a broad range of AI-generated material, from harmless memes to deepfakes that could be used to spread misinformation about political candidates.

  • stylized illustration of an open laptop displaying the ChatGPT interface

    'Early Version' of ChatGPT Windows App Now Available to Paid Users

    OpenAI has announced the release of the ChatGPT Windows desktop app, about five months after the macOS version became available.

  • person signing a bill at a desk with a faint glow around the document. A tablet and laptop are subtly visible in the background, with soft colors and minimal digital elements

    California Governor Signs AI Content Safeguards into Law

    California Governor Gavin Newsom has officially signed off on a series of landmark artificial intelligence bills, signaling the state’s latest efforts to regulate the burgeoning technology, particularly in response to the misuse of sexually explicit deepfakes. The legislation is aimed at mitigating the risks posed by AI-generated content, as concerns grow over the technology's potential to manipulate images, videos, and voices in ways that could cause significant harm.

  • Jetstream logo

    Qualified Free Access to Advanced Compute Resources with NSF's Jetstream2 and ACCESS

    Free access to advanced computing and HPC resources for your researchers and education programs? Check out NSF's Jetstream2 and ACCESS.