Orphaned Accounts Are a Growing Security Concern, Study Says
- By Jabulani Leffall
- 05/22/08
IT auditors examine accounts just like their financial auditing counterparts.
Instead of trial balances, they look at system user accounts to determine who
signed on when and who did what.
But what about who's logging into what account
and when? More important, are these people even around anymore?
These are some of the questions that a new
study by security software and consultancy
firm Symark International attempts to address. The report, released Monday,
revealed that 42 percent of the organizations surveyed have no idea how many orphaned
accounts they have. Moreover, more than a quarter of respondents said they don't
have a set procedure to locate or turn off orphaned accounts.
According to Symark and IT auditors, accounts that are no longer being used
by former employees as well as temporary consultant sign-on accounts, among
others, are a growing problem at enterprises large and small.
"We're talking about plumbing here so it's not a sexy thing," said
Ellen Libenson, vice president of product management at Symark. "But it's
something security, database and system administrators should look at and take
very seriously. It's not sexy until something goes wrong."
One need only look at what happened at online mortgage and loan company
LendingTree to see a perfect example of how accounts with no corresponding users
can cripple an enterprise. According to a letter
LendingTree released in April, a few of the company's former employees possibly
helped a small number of their mortgage lender friends gain access to the personal
information of LendingTree customers. They did this by sharing passwords and
accessing different data and proprietary documents between October 2006 and
early 2008. The company did not reveal how many individuals were complicit or the number
of records affected.
The situation exemplifies something that is endemic in
many IT shops where administrators don't have the time to shut off accounts
or there's neither proper communication between IT and HR about who's coming
and going, nor formal change management procedures in place.
"This issue is pretty common in many places in varying degrees,"
said Robert Green, a senior manager at PricewaterhouseCoopers' IT audit practice
in Los Angeles. "Another thing that is scary is nameless admin accounts
that are set up for development and programming purposes that just tend to sit
there. No name is assigned to them so it's a tougher audit trail to traverse
and, most of the time, you don't know who logged in when."
In cases like these, an IT auditor doing a security review may check off these
orphaned accounts as anything from a minor "exception" in testing
to a "significant deficiency," which--in the Sarbanes-Oxley and
compliance world--can lead to a material weakness that has to be disclosed
to shareholders and the public.
Symark's Libenson said the company was compelled to look at the issue after
talking to several IT auditors and seeing just how pervasive the orphaned account
problem is.
One of the most sobering results of the study that demonstrated that orphaned
accounts represent a major security and compliance challenge was the fact that
27 percent of the 850 IT, HR and C-level executives surveyed believe there are
more than 20 orphaned accounts that exist in their organization but don't
know how to find them.
Security experts agree that in a Windows environment, Active Directory is effective
in finding orphaned accounts, more so than Linux and Unix programs.
Libenson said, "The problem is you have to know you have orphan accounts
before you can use those tools."
More often than not, a spare "Admin" or "Jleffall" individual
user account can sit on a database for weeks, months and perhaps years with
nobody noticing. Such accounts are often overlooked as potential threat vectors.
What IT shops--and the C-level suites that ultimately govern them--can
do is tighten policies and procedures that would trigger work orders whenever an employee leaves an organization. This way, automated reminders will
show up and a person's access can be shut down posthaste.
Thoroughly updated and monitored super-user and administrative logs are also
good to keep around, in electronic form and perhaps in a binder, so that there
is proof of system activity and a trail to the source.
Additionally, periodic identity mapping projects designed to identify many
different kinds of user resources can be pivotal--not only in passing an audit
with flying colors, but in making sure your enterprise doesn't go the way of LendingTree.
Such mapping projects would include matching valid and assigned accounts, orphaned
accounts, dormant accounts, administrative resources and system resources with
actual activity.
"It's true that outside of the audit world, this doesn't come up a lot,"
said Jeff Nielsen, senior product manager for Symark. "But when it does
come up outside of the audit world, outside of the IT department and outside
of, say, the common directory program in Active Directory, it's too late."
About the Author
Jabulani Leffall is a business consultant and an award-winning journalist whose work has appeared in the Financial Times of London, Investor's Business Daily, The Economist and CFO Magazine, among others. He consulted for Deloitte & Touche LLP and was a business and world affairs commentator on ABC and CNN.