Researchers Say Gazelle Browser Offers Better Security
        
        
        
        
		A team consisting of Microsoft Research personnel and university  staff members has demonstrated a potentially more secure Web browser called  Gazelle. A paper (PDF)  describing the browser prototype was published at Microsoft Research Thursday. 
		However this research team, led by Helen J. Wang and others,  appears to be doing work that's separate from Microsoft's Internet Explorer 8  team. IE8 and Google Chrome frequently appear in the paper as examples of  browsers that get security wrong.
		The team claims that the Gazelle browser, which ran on  Windows Vista and uses Internet Explorer's Trident renderer, offers greater  security by using a browser-based operating system called a "browser  kernel." The browser kernel consists of approximately 5,000 lines of C#  code and is "resilient to memory attacks," according to the authors. Not  even IE8 offers the same protection, they contend.
		"No  existing browsers, including new architectures like IE 8, Google Chrome, and OP  [another experimental browser], have a multi-principal OS construction that  gives a browser-based OS, typically called Browser Kernel, the exclusive control  to manage the protection and fair-sharing of all system resources among browser  principals," the authors write.
		The Gazelle browser enables Web sites (or  "principals") to communicate with each other, but they do so by  passing messages through the browser kernel, just as would be done via interprocess  communications. The browser kernel manages security as well as the sharing  of system resources.
		In contrast to Google Chrome, Gazelle runs a Web page and  its embedded principals in separate processes. The authors also claim that  Gazelle handles tabbed browsing in a superior way to IE8.
		"IE  8 uses OS processes to isolate tabs from one another. This granularity is  insufficient since a user may browse multiple mutually distrusting sites in a  single tab and a web page may contain an iframe with content from an untrusted  site (e.g., ads)," the authors explain.
		Gazelle  separates same-origin domains, such as ad.datacenter.com and  user.datacenter.com, whereas Google Chrome considers them from the same site.  The browser kernel even manages address bars and menus in the browser, plus it  controls whether or not browser plug-ins can interoperate with the operating  system.
		The  overlay of transparent content, which can trick users into clicking on content  from another origin, is thwarted by a policy that makes dynamic  content-containing windows opaque.
		Gazelle  still has leaps and bounds to travel to get beyond its prototype stage. In many  instances, Gazelle is slower than IE7 due to greater overhead, although it does  start up faster than IE7.
		Gazelle  also may choke on the browser plug-in issue. The authors explain that  "existing plugin software must be adapted (ported or binary-rewritten) to  use Browser Kernel system calls to accomplish its tasks."
		The  authors did test Gazelle successfully on 19 of 20 Alexa-reported popular Web  sites, calling the browser's performance "acceptable." Some of the  overhead problems caused by "IE instrumentation" can be eliminated,  the authors say. 
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
            
        
        
                
                    About the Author
                    
                
                    
                    Kurt Mackie is online news editor, Enterprise Group, at 1105 Media Inc.