Despite Online Challenges, Faculty Optimistic About Future of STEM Education

STEM illustration

Seventy-three percent of STEM faculty in a recent survey had to shift from face-to-face to remote learning in fall 2020, experiencing a multitude of barriers to teaching STEM courses online. Yet most survey respondents remain optimistic about the future of STEM postsecondary education, according to a new report from the Online Learning Consortium and Bay View Analytics. The research, conducted in partnership with Every Learner Everywhere, Carolina Distance Learning and Digital Ed, with support from HHMI BioInteractive, was drawn from a national survey of 869 faculty across all STEM disciplines and institution types.  

In teaching STEM courses online, challenges faced by faculty included:

  • Inability to ensure academic integrity (cited by 52 percent of respondents);
  • Students not sufficiently motivated (48 percent);
  • Equity issues for some students (42 percent);
  • Student internet and computer access (38 percent);
  • Inadequate online laboratories (34 percent);
  • Students not technologically prepared (29 percent);
  • Lower retention rates in online courses (27 percent); and
  • Support in developing or delivering online courses (24 percent).

When asked which barrier was the most serious, the largest share of faculty (24 percent) cited student motivation, noting instances of students not showing up for lectures, shy students who were reluctant to participate or turn on their webcams, and students leaving a lecture early. Faculty also recognized students' high level of stress as well as the lack of interpersonal contact between student and instructor as factors negatively impacting student engagement.

In spite of the barriers, most faculty — 66 percent — said they were optimistic about the future of STEM education at their institutions. Optimism level varied in interesting ways across respondent subgroups. For example, 81 percent of faculty at public two-year colleges felt optimistic about the future of STEM education, compared to 67 percent at four-year private nonprofit institutions and 64 percent of four-year publics. Sixty-seven percent of faculty who had taught one or more online STEM courses felt optimistic, compared to 57 percent of those who had not taught online. And faculty teaching courses with accompanying labs were less optimistic that those whose courses did not have a lab component (62 percent vs. 69 percent, respectively).

The full report is available on the Bay View Analytics site.

About the Author

Rhea Kelly is editor in chief for Campus Technology, THE Journal, and Spaces4Learning. She can be reached at [email protected].

Featured

  • a hobbyist in casual clothes holds a hammer and a toolbox, building a DIY structure that symbolizes an AI model

    Ditch the DIY Approach to AI on Campus

    Institutions that do not adopt AI will quickly fall behind. The question is, how can colleges and universities do this systematically, securely, cost-effectively, and efficiently?

  • Copilot Propels Microsoft to Lead Position in Analytics/BI Market

    A new Gartner report on the analytics/business intelligence market places Microsoft in the lead position of the field. The Redmond cloud giant stands apart and alone atop the axes for both the ability to execute and completeness of vision in Gartner's latest "Magic Quadrant for Analytics and Business Intelligence Platforms."

  • white desk with an open digital tablet showing AI-related icons like gears and neural networks

    Elon University and AAC&U Release Student Guide to AI

    A new publication from Elon University 's Imagining the Digital Future Center and the American Association of Colleges and Universities offers students key principles for navigating college in the age of artificial intelligence.

  • scientists working in a lab

    Learning Engineering: New Profession or Transformational Process?

    Learning engineering combines theories from the learning sciences with problem-solving approaches from engineering, to create a process that can transform research results into learning action. Here, Ellen Wagner guides an exploration of this transformational process.