Tech Giants Agree to Put Limits on Gen AI Systems

Sixteen generative AI leaders — including OpenAI, Microsoft, Google, and Anthropic — have agreed to pull the plug on their own AI technologies if they're deemed too dangerous.

The companies are signatories of the "Frontier AI Safety Commitments" document unveiled last week at the AI Seoul Summit. The document, which lays out guidelines for limiting AI misuse, was dubbed a "world first" by the the U.K. government, which co-hosted the summit alongside the Republic of Korea.

The full list of signatories is:

  • Amazon 
  • Anthropic 
  • Cohere 
  • Google/Google DeepMind 
  • G42 
  • IBM 
  • Inflection AI 
  • Meta 
  • Microsoft 
  • Mistral AI 
  • Naver 
  • OpenAI 
  • Samsung Electronics 
  • Technology Innovation Institute 
  • xAI 
  • Zhipu.ai

In the topmost goal of the document, organizations are asked to "effectively identify, assess and manage risks when developing and deploying their frontier AI models and systems."

Many of the signatories already have internal requirements meant to ensure the safety of their AI technologies. OpenAI, for example, unveiled an AI "preparedness framework" last year, though it's still in beta. It also recently formed a new AI Safety and Security Committee, albeit after disbanding its previous AI safety committee.

Microsoft, meanwhile, abides by its Responsible AI Standard developed in 2016. Meta and others are also independently exploring ways to "watermark" content created by their AI systems to limit misinformation, especially in light of this year's elections.

Critically, however, a tenet of this first commitment is that organizations must agree to kill development of AI systems that are beyond saving.

Specifically, they must define "thresholds at which severe risks posed by a model or system, unless adequately mitigated, would be deemed intolerable," and "commit not to develop or deploy a model or system at all, if mitigations cannot be applied to keep risks below the thresholds."

The companies are tasked with defining their kill thresholds over the coming months, with the goal of publishing a formal safety framework in time for the AI Action Summit happening February 2025 in France.

The two other goals outlined in the document are:

  • Organisations are accountable for safely developing and deploying their frontier AI models and systems.
  • Organisations' approaches to frontier AI safety are appropriately transparent to external actors, including governments.

The document also lists several AI safety best practices that the signatories pledge to apply, if they haven't already. These include red-teaming, watermarking, incentivizing third-party testing, creating safeguards against insider threats, and more.

Said U.K. Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, "These commitments ensure the world's leading AI companies will provide transparency and accountability on their plans to develop safe AI." The pledges laid out in the document do not carry legal weight, however; they're described as "voluntary commitments."

About the Author

Gladys Rama (@GladysRama3) is the editorial director of Converge360.

Featured

  • artificial intelligence on laptop

    OpenAI to Combine AI Products into Desktop 'Superapp'

    OpenAI is reportedly developing a desktop application that would combine several of its emerging AI products into a single platform, according to reports, marking the latest step in the company's effort to transform ChatGPT from a standalone chatbot into a broader productivity and automation environment.

  • Abstract digital data stream with binary code and colorful light trails

    Microsoft Releases Open Source AI Safety Tools for Agent Development

    Microsoft released RAMPART and Clarity as open-source projects intended to help developers test AI agents earlier in the software lifecycle and turn red-team findings into repeatable engineering checks.

  • abstract illustration of artificial intelligence

    CSU Shares AI Learnings in Systemwide Survey

    In a systemwide survey of more than 94,000 faculty, staff, and students, California State University recently documented widespread AI use across its 22 campuses.

  • Profile silhouette of a person thoughtfully touching their chin, overlaid with transparent data visualizations and digital interface elements suggesting artificial intelligence and analytics.

    The Institutional Knowledge Shift Is Reshaping Higher Ed IT

    Higher education IT leaders are navigating a quiet but consequential transition: Experienced team members are retiring or leaving for private-sector roles, and the teams replacing them are smaller, newer, and often stretched thin. The result is a structural shift in how technology decisions are made, executed, and sustained.