Some Light on the Higher Ed Horizon

As another year dawns, the economic outlook for U.S. public higher education institutions is pretty bleak. However, I think there are some bright spots on the horizon for those of us who work with electronically delivered classes and programs.

More faculty members than ever before are using technology to provide academic services to students. At the recent Western Cooperative for Educational Telecommunications (WCET) conference, Gartner Research Group predicted that by the end of this year 80 percent of higher education institutions will have a single, enterprisewide course management system. While most of the students using these resources will also be taking face-to-face classes on their campuses, many will be distance learning students. That means more place-committed students will be able to have access to higher education.

As more faculty members are using course management systems, they are looking for ways to save some of their time by not creating everything they use. While they want to create a unique "class" for their students, they are realizing they can take advantage of some of the open educational resources now available for them. MIT's course materials are coming online (www.MIT.edu); Rice University's Connexions project (www.cnx.org) will provide open-access teaching materials; The MERLOT project (www.merlot.org) continues to make learning objects available for faculty to use. In addition, the faculty that created Virginia Tech's Math Emporium (www.vt.edu), which has lowered costs and increased the quality of students' learning, is willing to make their software available in an open format for faculties at other campuses to adapt and use. I like to think of all these types of projects as gifts to the world.

In addition, state leaders are finally looking at policies and practices that have been inhibitors to institutions using distance learning to serve students. These barriers usually inadvertently developed as they evolved to address problems prior to the current capabilities of technology to effectively serve students. One of the most common barriers involves differential funding for electronic and face-to-face classes. In many states electronically delivered classes were funded at a percentage of on-campus classes or not eligible at all for state reimbursement. This is beginning to change as policy-makers in several states are realizing they need to serve more students for little increase in cost. They hope to divert some of the students' activities away from campuses and realize they must fund the campuses to make it worthwhile.

Finally, as Dennis Jones, president of the National Center for Higher Education Management Systems, always points out, 85 percent of campus budgets are tied up with people. Cutting the budgets for savings from the other 15 percent makes little sense when campuses are seeing serious budget deficits. The technology budgets fall into that other 15 percent. Re-arranging how people on campuses work and what they do is the only way to really change the costs of serving students. Hopefully, state and campus decision makers will understand this and focus their efforts on helping change faculty and staff activities.

While things may seem a little bleak this new year, I think we will see dramatically increased opportunities for creative thinkers. We have an opportunity to encourage the adoption of some new ways to use technologies for teaching and learning.

I wish for each of you a peaceful 2003.

About the Author

Sally Johnstone is founding director of the Western Cooperative for Educational Telecommunications (WCET) and serves on advisory groups for state, national, and international organizations to help plan and evaluate eLearning projects.

Featured

  • abstract illustration of a glowing AI-themed bar graph on a dark digital background with circuit patterns

    Stanford 2025 AI Index Reveals Surge in Adoption, Investment, and Global Impact as Trust and Regulation Lag Behind

    Stanford University's Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HAI) has released its AI Index Report 2025, measuring AI's diverse impacts over the past year.

  • modern college building with circuit and brain motifs

    Anthropic Launches Claude for Education

    Anthropic has announced a version of its Claude AI assistant tailored for higher education institutions. Claude for Education "gives academic institutions secure, reliable AI access for their entire community," the company said, to enable colleges and universities to develop and implement AI-enabled approaches across teaching, learning, and administration.

  • lightbulb

    Call for Speakers Now Open for Tech Tactics in Education: Overcoming Roadblocks to Innovation

    The annual virtual conference from the producers of Campus Technology and THE Journal will return on September 25, 2025, with a focus on emerging trends in cybersecurity, data privacy, AI implementation, IT leadership, building resilience, and more.

  • From Fire TV to Signage Stick: University of Utah's Digital Signage Evolution

    Jake Sorensen, who oversees sponsorship and advertising and Student Media in Auxiliary Business Development at the University of Utah, has navigated the digital signage landscape for nearly 15 years. He was managing hundreds of devices on campus that were incompatible with digital signage requirements and needed a solution that was reliable and lowered labor costs. The Amazon Signage Stick, specifically engineered for digital signage applications, gave him the stability and design functionality the University of Utah needed, along with the assurance of long-term support.