Princeton Establishes Online Prosody Archive for Study of Poetry

Meredith Martin is applying digital tools to the study of poetry. Image courtesy of Denise Applewhite, Princeton Office of Communications.Princeton University has created the Princeton Prosody Archive, a full-text searchable database of more than 10,000 digitized records on the teaching of poetry between 1750 and 1923.

Prosody refers to the rhythm and sound of poetry, and the study of prosody uses prosodic marks, such as accents or breves above syllables in poetic texts, to indicate how the poem is intended to be read. These rules for reading poetry have changed over time, and scholars need to search through historical texts for prosodic marks to study how those rules changed. Some of the documents have been digitized by initiatives such as Google Books and some others are stored in various databases, but typical optical character recognition technology cannot recognize or digitize the prosodic marks that are so important to the study of prosody.

To solve this problem, Meredith Martin, an associate professor of English at Princeton began building the Princeton Prosody Archive in 2011, with the help of computer scientists and librarians. The archive collects these historical documents and makes them searchable for scholars. Princeton also has an agreement with Google Books and the nonprofit book repository HathiTrust to allow access to many of the books. Eventually, the university will add scanned newspapers and journal articles to the archive.

Currently, the Prosody Archive is annotating records with prosodic marks manually, but over the next three years the team hopes to develop a computer model for encoding the marks, as well as tools for natural language-processing techniques. To preserve other information, such as handwritten notes on pages, the archive will include scanned images of the pages along with each text.

The Prosody Archive is housed at Princeton as part of the Center for Digital Humanities. Its computer architecture was developed by Travis Brown of the University of Maryland Institute for Technology in the Humanities. Support for the archive was provided by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation.

The archive is currently in beta-testing. The university plans to make it accessible to the public by the end of the year, and full access to the archive should be available by 2017.

Further information about the Princeton Prosody Archive can be found on Princeton's site.

About the Author

Leila Meyer is a technology writer based in British Columbia. She can be reached at [email protected].

Featured

  • cybersecurity book with a shield and padlock

    NIST Proposes New Cybersecurity Guidelines for AI Systems

    The National Institute of Standards and Technology has unveiled plans to issue a new set of cybersecurity guidelines aimed at safeguarding artificial intelligence systems, citing rising concerns over risks tied to generative models, predictive analytics, and autonomous agents.

  • glowing crystal ball with network connections

    Call for Opinions: 2026 Predictions for Higher Ed IT

    How will the technology landscape in higher education change in the coming year? We're inviting our readership to weigh in with their predictions, wishes, or worries for 2026.

  • Hand holding a stylus over a tablet with futuristic risk management icons

    Why Universities Are Ransomware's Easy Target: Lessons from the 23% Surge

    Academic environments face heightened risk because their collaboration-driven environments are inherently open, making them more susceptible to attack, while the high-value research data they hold makes them an especially attractive target. The question is not if this data will be targeted, but whether universities can defend it swiftly enough against increasingly AI-powered threats.

  • conceptual graph of rising AI adoption

    Report: AI Adoption Rising, but Trust Gap Limits Impact

    A recent global study found that while the adoption of artificial intelligence continues to expand rapidly across industries, a misalignment between perceived trust in AI systems and their actual trustworthiness is limiting business returns.