Report: Education Department's IT Security is 'Not Generally Effective'

The United States Department of Education’s Office of Inspector General has found in a recent report that the department’s overall information technology security is “not generally effective” in meeting several federal requirements. The ed department (ED) and its Federal Student Aid (FSA) office scored only 53 points out of 100 in a recent security audit.

The report, published Monday, found that during a fiscal year 2016 audit, the ED was not generally effective in the following three security functions: protect, detect and respond.  

In the security function called “protect,” the ed department scored 7 points out of 20. In the function titled “detect,” the department scored 3 points out of 20. And in the function dubbed “respond,” the department again scored only 3 points out of 20.

The Office of Inspector General found that the ED and FSA were generally effective in two of five security functions: identify and recover.

The report also found that the ED had made some improvements since its fiscal year 2015 audit. However, “weaknesses remained” and “the Department and FSA’s information systems continued to be vulnerable to security threats.” 

The report detailed some specific weaknesses, namely:

  • Select policies and procedures are not current with National Institute of Standards and Technology and departmental guidance;
  • Appropriate application connection protocols were not being used;
  • The department is unable to prevent unauthorized devices from being connected to the network;
  • The implementation and management of the technical security architecture supporting the department’s and FSA’s applications require strengthening to more effectively restrict unauthorized access to information resources; and
  • The Office of the Chief Information Officer and FSA did not implement remedial actions for previously identified security weaknesses and did not establish a proactive enterprise-wide process to fix similar vulnerabilities identified during previous audits.

The report offers 15 recommendations, six of which are repeat recommendations, to assist the ED and FSA with increasing the effectiveness of their information security programs so they comply with federal requirements.

The report also states, “Although the (Ed) Department and FSA may have taken action on specific findings, systemic issues persist in these metric domains on an enterprise-level.”

The full report, titled “The U.S. Department of Education’s Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2014 Report for Fiscal Year 2016,” is accessible for free on the ED’s website.

About the Author

Richard Chang is associate editor of THE Journal. He can be reached at [email protected].

Featured

  • Training the Next Generation of Space Cybersecurity Experts

    CT asked Scott Shackelford, Indiana University professor of law and director of the Ostrom Workshop Program on Cybersecurity and Internet Governance, about the possible emergence of space cybersecurity as a separate field that would support changing practices and foster future space cybersecurity leaders.

  • modern college building with circuit and brain motifs

    Anthropic Launches Claude for Education

    Anthropic has announced a version of its Claude AI assistant tailored for higher education institutions. Claude for Education "gives academic institutions secure, reliable AI access for their entire community," the company said, to enable colleges and universities to develop and implement AI-enabled approaches across teaching, learning, and administration.

  • AI microchip, a cybersecurity shield with a lock, a dollar coin, and a laptop with financial graphs connected by dotted lines

    Survey: Generative AI Surpasses Cybersecurity in 2025 Tech Budgets

    Global IT leaders are placing bigger bets on generative artificial intelligence than cybersecurity in 2025, according to new research by Amazon Web Services (AWS).

  • university building surrounded by icons for AI, checklists, and data governance

    Improving AI Governance for Stronger University Compliance and Innovation

    AI can generate valuable insights for higher education institutions and it can be used to enhance the teaching process itself. The caveat is that this can only be achieved when universities adopt a strategic and proactive set of data and process management policies for their use of AI.