DQC Urges States to Use Data to Improve Teacher Prep

While states have all kinds of requirements laying out how teachers should be prepared for the classroom, they don’t often give back information on how those teachers do in the classroom that could lead to improvements in their educator preparation programs.

A new brief from the Data Quality Campaign encourages state education leaders and regulators to evaluate what data they can collect from training programs that will help those programs get better. Likewise, it urges them to reach out to teachers themselves to learn more about what works and doesn't work for professional development. DQC is a nonprofit that focuses on topics related to the use of data for educational purposes.

According to "Using Data to Ensure That Teachers Are Learner Ready on Day One," the data needed to develop policies and practices for improving teacher quality is unavailable to those who need it because states, educator preparation programs and school administrators tend to collect and use their data in silos. As a result, information such as teacher performance data isn't shared back to preparation programs that could use it to improve their training efforts.

The Data Quality Campaign's 2014 Data for Action survey found that just 22 states share teachers classroom performance each year with their in-state educator preparation programs. A 2016 survey by the Council of Chief State School Officers and Teacher Preparation Analytics identified only 10 states that include observations of those graduates' performance in the classroom as an indicator in reviews of those programs.

As proof of the need for more good data, earlier this year the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education and research company Westat kicked off a pilot to test out a new state survey instrument for beginning teachers and their supervisors. The intent is to gather more detailed information about how those new teachers do in the classroom to help states compare programs.

The report offers several recommendations to states for supporting "continuous improvement in educator preparation," among them:

  • Share information about teachers' performance with those education programs that train them, but make sure it's done securely;
  • Conduct a state-wide survey among teachers and then share the results with teacher training programs to "encourage improvements" that will benefit future teachers;
  • Collaborate with "key groups"--training programs, education agencies and teachers--to figure out what data would be helpful; and
  • Develop a data link that will tie teachers to students by course to be able to understand how student academic progress is tied to teacher training and practice.

The eight-page brief is openly available on the DQC website here.

About the Author

Dian Schaffhauser is a former senior contributing editor for 1105 Media's education publications THE Journal, Campus Technology and Spaces4Learning.

Featured

  • Abstract Network of Blue and Orange Lines

    Tech Industry Leaders Launch Open Secure AI Alliance

    NVIDIA and 36 other partners are targeting agent security across multi-vendor clouds by combining open technologies for workload identity, agent controls, vulnerability scanning, and software supply-chain security.

  • Abstract neural network 3D illustration

    Intel® AI EmpowerED: The AI-Ready Campus, Delivered

    Artificial intelligence is transforming higher education, prompting institutions to rethink how they manage infrastructure, security, governance, and workforce readiness. Successful adoption requires a strategic, institution-wide approach that aligns AI initiatives with educational goals, faculty enablement, and scalable operational frameworks.

  • shattered digital cloud with red warning alert icons

    CSA's Top Cloud Threats: Identity, AI

    Cloud Security Alliance's 2026 Top Threats report ranks identity first while adding two AI-related risks to its list of 11 leading cloud security concerns.

  • Neon blue security locks with a single red highlight

    AI Shifts Cybersecurity Focus from Finding Flaws to Fixing Them

    For decades, one of cybersecurity's most difficult challenges has been finding vulnerabilities before attackers do. A growing number of security professionals now say artificial intelligence is changing that equation, shifting the focus from discovering flaws to fixing them quickly enough to prevent exploitation.