Even the Mere Presence of a Smartphone Makes You Dumber

A joint research project at several universities found that the "persistent presence" of smartphones comes at a "cognitive cost." Researchers in the schools of management at the University of Texas at Austin and the University of California, San Diego as well as the Department of Social and Decision Sciences at Carnegie Mellon ran two experiments to attempt to measure how well people finish tasks when their smartphones are nearby — even if the phones aren't in use.

For one experiment, 548 study participants were asked to sit at a computer and take a variety of tests that required concentration. The tests were geared to measure their "available cognitive capacity" — the ability for them to hold onto and process data at any given time.

Before the testing began, they were randomly assigned to one of three groups. One group was told to leave all their belongings in the lobby before entering the testing room. Another group was told to leave most of their belongings in the lobby, but to take their phones into the testing room "for use in a later study"; once inside, they were instructed to place their phones face down in a specified location on their desks. A third group was informed that they could keep their belongings with them in the testing room and keep their phones "wherever they 'naturally' would"; most (52 percent) put them in their pockets and the rest kept them in their bags. Everybody in all three groups was instructed to turn off the ring as well as the vibrate to prevent the phones from drawing attention.

Afterward, participants were asked to assess how much their phones affected their performance on the tasks. Almost all — 80 percent — believed that the location of their phones didn't affect their performance at all.

Yet across the board, research subjects whose phones were in the other room did far better than those who had their phones on the desk in front of them; they also "slightly outperformed" those who had their phones with them but placed in a pocket or a bag. And, as the research report explained, the gap between perceived influence and actual performance suggested that people couldn't anticipate or acknowledge the consequences of having their phones with them.

The second experiment followed the same basic design of the first one, but participants were also asked to self-report their smartphone dependence based on such factors as how difficult it would be for them to get through a normal day without their phones or how anxious they'd feel if they forgot their phones.

Those who felt they were most dependent on their smartphones did worse on the tests, but only when they placed their smartphones on the desk or in their pockets or bags. It didn't matter whether the phone was facedown or face up, turned on or turned off. According to the researchers, just having the phone within sight or reach reduced their ability to focus and do the tasks asked of them because some part of their brain was "actively working to not pick up or use the phone," as an article about the experiment explained.

"Ironically," the researchers noted, "the more consumers depend on their smartphones, the more they seem to suffer from their presence — or, more optimistically, the more they may stand to benefit from their absence."

The researchers specifically addressed smartphone usage in the education. Their advice: Think twice. "As educational institutions increasingly embrace 'connected classrooms'," the report stated, "the presence of students' mobile devices in educational environments may undermine both learning and test performance — particularly when these devices are present but not in use."

If we are to regain our full thinking power, there's just one simple solution, the results observed: separation. Adding "defined and protected periods of separation" to our lives, the researchers suggested, "may allow consumers to perform better not just by reducing interruptions but also by increasing available cognitive capacity."

The research results are openly available on the website for the Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, published by the University of Chicago Press.

About the Author

Dian Schaffhauser is a former senior contributing editor for 1105 Media's education publications THE Journal, Campus Technology and Spaces4Learning.

Featured

  • stacks of glowing digital documents with circuit patterns and data streams

    Mistral AI Introduces AI-Powered OCR

    French AI startup Mistral AI has launched Mistral OCR, an advanced optical character recognition (OCR) API designed to convert printed and scanned documents into digital files with "unprecedented accuracy."

  • open laptop in a college classroom with holographic AI icons like a brain and data charts rising from the screen

    4 Ways Universities Are Using Google AI Tools for Learning and Administration

    In a recent blog post, Google shared an array of education customer stories, showcasing ways institutions are using AI tools like Gemini and NotebookLM to transform both learning and administrative tasks.

  • a professional worker in business casual attire interacting with a large screen displaying a generative AI interface in a modern office

    Study: Generative AI Could Inhibit Critical Thinking

    A new study on how knowledge workers engage in critical thinking found that workers with higher confidence in generative AI technology tend to employ less critical thinking to AI-generated outputs than workers with higher confidence in personal skills.

  • abstract geometric pattern of glowing interconnected triangles, hexagons, and circles in blue, gold, and white, spread across a dark navy-to-black gradient background

    OpenAI Unveils 'Operator' AI for Performing Web Tasks

    OpenAI has launched "Operator," an AI agent designed to perform web-based tasks autonomously using its own browser. Currently available as a research preview for Pro users in the United States, the tool aims to automate everyday activities such as filling out forms, ordering groceries, and even creating memes.