Courseware in Context Framework Gets Update, OLC Takes Over Project -- Campus Technology

Breaking News

Courseware in Context Framework Gets Update, OLC Takes Over Project

By Rhea Kelly
09/20/18

The Courseware in Context (CWiC) Framework is getting a number of updates for 2018. The free suite of resources, originally launched in 2016 by the Online Learning Consortium and Tyton Partners (with contributions from SRI International), offers information and guidelines for selecting and implementing digital courseware products.

"The CWiC Framework is a robust tool to help institutions evaluate courseware offerings and ensure they are implemented in an effective manner," explained Jennifer Mathes, chief strategy officer at the Online Learning Consortium, in a statement. "The 2018 version of the Framework makes important improvements based on the feedback gathered by the CWiC Executive Committee from institutions and vendors over the last year."

New features include:

Updates to the product taxonomy, including information on accessibility standards;
Case studies on CWiC Framework pilots at Southern New Hampshire University and the University of North Carolina at Charlotte;
Expanded functionality on LearnPlatform to support vendor self-reported data;
Revised course- and program-level quality indicators for assessing effective courseware implementation; and
A new Guide to Courseware Adoption and CWiC Guide to Total Cost of Ownership.

With the new updates, responsibility for management of the CWiC Framework project is transitioning from Tyton Partners to the Online Learning Consortium. In addition, the CWiC Framework has announced its Executive Committee for the 2018-2019 term, made up of courseware and digital learning experts from higher education institutions across the country who will govern the framework's content and resources. This year's committee members are:

Kelvin Bentley, assistant VP for digital learning innovation at the University of West Florida;
Niki Bray, instructional designer at the University of Memphis;
Terry Di Paolo, executive dean of online instructional services for Dallas County Community College District;
Bonnie Grohe, director of faculty development and online education at Fayetteville State University;
Angela Gunder, director of instructional design and curriculum development at The University of Arizona;
Romy Hughes, assistant provost, Koehler Center for Innovation, Instruction and Engagement, Texas Christian University;
Mark McBride, library senior strategist, State University of New York system;
Joseph Moreau, vice chancellor of technology for Foothill de Anza Community College District;
Tracey Osborne, associate vice president of academic resources at Southern New Hampshire University; and
Ruth Tarantine, university dean of nursing, Colorado Technical University.

For more information, visit the CWiC Framework site.

About the Author

Rhea Kelly is editor in chief for Campus Technology, THE Journal, and Spaces4Learning. She can be reached at [email protected].

E-Mail this page

Printable Format

Featured

CSA's Top Cloud Threats: Identity, AI

Cloud Security Alliance's 2026 Top Threats report ranks identity first while adding two AI-related risks to its list of 11 leading cloud security concerns.
Flashpoint Patents Ransomware Risk Model, Tying Vulnerabilites to Likelihood of Attack

Cybersecurity company Flashpoint recently announced it has received U.S. Patent No. 12,705,360 for its Ransomware Risk model, a methodology designed to help security teams determine which newly disclosed vulnerabilities more closely resemble those historically used in ransomware attacks.
Redesigned Copilot Will Build Apps and Work on Its Own

Microsoft recently announced that it's redesigning Copilot, the company's all-encompassing AI assistant, so users can hand off complex tasks, build tools by describing what they need and assign work to an agent that keeps going after they log off.
AI Giants Warn It May Be Time to Slow Down

For years, leaders in the artificial intelligence industry have warned that increasingly capable AI systems could eventually become dangerous, all the while continuing to race to build them. Now, their sentiments have changed.